Total babies named Veda (all years): 13,701
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 407 / #692 / 0.025% |
| 2023 | 342 / #815 / 0.021% |
| 2022 | 313 / #890 / 0.019% |
| 2021 | 313 / #872 / 0.019% |
| 2020 | 283 / #918 / 0.018% |
| 2019 | 316 / #850 / 0.019% |
| 2018 | 301 / #896 / 0.018% |
| 2017 | 319 / #859 / 0.018% |
| 2016 | 319 / #884 / 0.018% |
| 2015 | 289 / #938 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 226 / #1123 / 0.013% |
| 2013 | 211 / #1142 / 0.012% |
| 2012 | 177 / #1333 / 0.010% |
| 2011 | 202 / #1195 / 0.011% |
| 2010 | 155 / #1467 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 133 / #1686 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 132 / #1702 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 96 / #2114 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 75 / #2481 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 98 / #1966 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 65 / #2588 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 62 / #2607 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 67 / #2411 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 49 / #2959 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 60 / #2541 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 50 / #2779 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 28 / #4134 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 31 / #3707 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 40 / #3021 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 25 / #4211 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 24 / #4371 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 36 / #3219 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 19 / #5261 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 10 / #8569 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 17 / #5542 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 11 / #7433 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 20 / #4278 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 17 / #4719 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 10 / #6944 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 18 / #4315 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 20 / #3944 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 25 / #3415 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 27 / #3246 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 25 / #3409 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 21 / #3772 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 34 / #2569 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 20 / #3754 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 27 / #2860 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 28 / #2741 / 0.002% |
| 1974 | 31 / #2496 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 41 / #2018 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 35 / #2219 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 63 / #1558 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 48 / #1856 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 54 / #1647 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 59 / #1490 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 74 / #1253 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 78 / #1223 / 0.005% |
| 1965 | 73 / #1261 / 0.004% |
| 1964 | 102 / #1084 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 108 / #1034 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 101 / #1080 / 0.005% |
| 1961 | 116 / #1011 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 128 / #945 / 0.006% |
| 1959 | 119 / #970 / 0.006% |
| 1958 | 122 / #936 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 95 / #1071 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 108 / #976 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 79 / #1128 / 0.004% |
| 1954 | 128 / #833 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 107 / #913 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 96 / #963 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 93 / #969 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 97 / #908 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 91 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 137 / #724 / 0.008% |
| 1947 | 164 / #653 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 200 / #563 / 0.013% |
| 1945 | 83 / #829 / 0.006% |
| 1944 | 65 / #970 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 67 / #975 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 82 / #852 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 70 / #875 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 80 / #794 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 68 / #857 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 89 / #730 / 0.008% |
| 1937 | 95 / #702 / 0.009% |
| 1936 | 99 / #665 / 0.010% |
| 1935 | 101 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1934 | 118 / #611 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 106 / #640 / 0.011% |
| 1932 | 97 / #691 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 97 / #681 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 126 / #617 / 0.011% |
| 1929 | 143 / #575 / 0.013% |
| 1928 | 137 / #603 / 0.012% |
| 1927 | 145 / #588 / 0.012% |
| 1926 | 166 / #546 / 0.014% |
| 1925 | 169 / #554 / 0.014% |
| 1924 | 167 / #564 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 162 / #566 / 0.013% |
| 1922 | 166 / #554 / 0.014% |
| 1921 | 188 / #518 / 0.015% |
| 1920 | 193 / #498 / 0.016% |
| 1919 | 164 / #537 / 0.015% |
| 1918 | 167 / #545 / 0.014% |
| 1917 | 169 / #511 / 0.016% |
| 1916 | 171 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1915 | 168 / #477 / 0.017% |
| 1914 | 118 / #517 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 107 / #494 / 0.017% |
| 1912 | 101 / #477 / 0.018% |
| 1911 | 74 / #482 / 0.018% |
| 1910 | 65 / #511 / 0.016% |
| 1909 | 56 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1908 | 60 / #467 / 0.018% |
| 1907 | 59 / #467 / 0.019% |
| 1906 | 51 / #484 / 0.017% |
| 1905 | 54 / #463 / 0.019% |
| 1904 | 40 / #527 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 52 / #448 / 0.020% |
| 1902 | 52 / #433 / 0.020% |
| 1901 | 52 / #420 / 0.022% |
| 1900 | 52 / #474 / 0.017% |
| 1899 | 50 / #415 / 0.021% |
| 1898 | 46 / #459 / 0.018% |
| 1897 | 44 / #448 / 0.019% |
| 1896 | 37 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1895 | 41 / #453 / 0.018% |
| 1894 | 31 / #525 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 22 / #626 / 0.010% |
| 1892 | 23 / #589 / 0.011% |
| 1891 | 18 / #643 / 0.010% |
| 1890 | 27 / #506 / 0.014% |
| 1889 | 19 / #598 / 0.011% |
| 1888 | 26 / #501 / 0.015% |
| 1887 | 16 / #585 / 0.011% |
| 1886 | 8 / #891 / 0.006% |
| 1885 | 17 / #540 / 0.013% |
| 1884 | 9 / #787 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 5 / #1021 / 0.005% |
| 1881 | 6 / #822 / 0.007% |