Total babies named Seth (all years): 165,768
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 530 / #558 / 0.031% |
| 2023 | 562 / #526 / 0.033% |
| 2022 | 649 / #474 / 0.037% |
| 2021 | 605 / #489 / 0.035% |
| 2020 | 687 / #433 / 0.040% |
| 2019 | 830 / #380 / 0.046% |
| 2018 | 860 / #375 / 0.047% |
| 2017 | 1,066 / #320 / 0.058% |
| 2016 | 1,168 / #303 / 0.062% |
| 2015 | 1,350 / #271 / 0.070% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,506 / #250 / 0.078% |
| 2013 | 1,596 / #231 / 0.084% |
| 2012 | 1,815 / #209 / 0.096% |
| 2011 | 2,094 / #184 / 0.110% |
| 2010 | 2,383 / #164 / 0.124% |
| 2009 | 2,945 / #139 / 0.148% |
| 2008 | 3,283 / #128 / 0.161% |
| 2007 | 3,768 / #115 / 0.182% |
| 2006 | 4,328 / #103 / 0.211% |
| 2005 | 4,713 / #91 / 0.236% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 5,188 / #80 / 0.261% |
| 2003 | 5,256 / #80 / 0.266% |
| 2002 | 5,740 / #72 / 0.296% |
| 2001 | 6,223 / #68 / 0.320% |
| 2000 | 6,717 / #63 / 0.342% |
| 1999 | 6,304 / #65 / 0.328% |
| 1998 | 4,587 / #86 / 0.240% |
| 1997 | 4,043 / #97 / 0.214% |
| 1996 | 3,886 / #103 / 0.205% |
| 1995 | 3,911 / #97 / 0.205% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 4,135 / #90 / 0.214% |
| 1993 | 4,060 / #93 / 0.207% |
| 1992 | 3,912 / #94 / 0.196% |
| 1991 | 3,812 / #99 / 0.189% |
| 1990 | 3,559 / #102 / 0.173% |
| 1989 | 3,635 / #94 / 0.182% |
| 1988 | 3,492 / #90 / 0.182% |
| 1987 | 3,338 / #89 / 0.179% |
| 1986 | 2,981 / #97 / 0.162% |
| 1985 | 2,821 / #105 / 0.153% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 2,911 / #99 / 0.161% |
| 1983 | 2,857 / #98 / 0.159% |
| 1982 | 2,907 / #102 / 0.160% |
| 1981 | 3,137 / #95 / 0.175% |
| 1980 | 3,050 / #99 / 0.171% |
| 1979 | 2,840 / #101 / 0.165% |
| 1978 | 2,504 / #106 / 0.153% |
| 1977 | 2,288 / #118 / 0.139% |
| 1976 | 2,098 / #128 / 0.134% |
| 1975 | 1,866 / #136 / 0.120% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,410 / #170 / 0.090% |
| 1973 | 1,137 / #196 / 0.073% |
| 1972 | 867 / #244 / 0.053% |
| 1971 | 781 / #271 / 0.044% |
| 1970 | 795 / #269 / 0.043% |
| 1969 | 580 / #319 / 0.032% |
| 1968 | 525 / #333 / 0.030% |
| 1967 | 395 / #379 / 0.023% |
| 1966 | 343 / #408 / 0.019% |
| 1965 | 323 / #431 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 348 / #429 / 0.017% |
| 1963 | 291 / #463 / 0.014% |
| 1962 | 314 / #447 / 0.015% |
| 1961 | 328 / #446 / 0.015% |
| 1960 | 340 / #436 / 0.016% |
| 1959 | 293 / #467 / 0.014% |
| 1958 | 316 / #443 / 0.015% |
| 1957 | 261 / #485 / 0.012% |
| 1956 | 245 / #488 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 215 / #505 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 215 / #495 / 0.011% |
| 1953 | 176 / #538 / 0.009% |
| 1952 | 129 / #621 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 119 / #648 / 0.006% |
| 1950 | 132 / #594 / 0.007% |
| 1949 | 138 / #576 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 100 / #677 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 90 / #726 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 91 / #680 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 77 / #698 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 63 / #795 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 84 / #701 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 82 / #711 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 70 / #745 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 57 / #838 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 61 / #781 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 65 / #763 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 60 / #801 / 0.006% |
| 1936 | 52 / #852 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 56 / #842 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 71 / #728 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 70 / #731 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 66 / #785 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 56 / #854 / 0.005% |
| 1930 | 55 / #908 / 0.005% |
| 1929 | 64 / #813 / 0.006% |
| 1928 | 74 / #750 / 0.007% |
| 1927 | 68 / #809 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 82 / #707 / 0.007% |
| 1925 | 96 / #653 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 83 / #729 / 0.007% |
| 1923 | 94 / #663 / 0.009% |
| 1922 | 95 / #664 / 0.009% |
| 1921 | 109 / #607 / 0.010% |
| 1920 | 109 / #603 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 86 / #672 / 0.009% |
| 1918 | 100 / #616 / 0.010% |
| 1917 | 81 / #667 / 0.009% |
| 1916 | 84 / #639 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 80 / #651 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 67 / #621 / 0.010% |
| 1913 | 66 / #536 / 0.013% |
| 1912 | 41 / #667 / 0.010% |
| 1911 | 22 / #686 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 15 / #815 / 0.008% |
| 1909 | 23 / #556 / 0.014% |
| 1908 | 20 / #579 / 0.013% |
| 1907 | 20 / #553 / 0.014% |
| 1906 | 17 / #582 / 0.013% |
| 1905 | 17 / #589 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 14 / #640 / 0.011% |
| 1903 | 18 / #520 / 0.015% |
| 1902 | 10 / #787 / 0.008% |
| 1901 | 15 / #529 / 0.014% |
| 1900 | 27 / #442 / 0.018% |
| 1899 | 11 / #654 / 0.010% |
| 1898 | 14 / #603 / 0.011% |
| 1897 | 19 / #457 / 0.017% |
| 1896 | 11 / #717 / 0.009% |
| 1895 | 18 / #488 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 14 / #560 / 0.012% |
| 1893 | 15 / #502 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 29 / #354 / 0.024% |
| 1891 | 22 / #373 / 0.022% |
| 1890 | 15 / #507 / 0.014% |
| 1889 | 27 / #347 / 0.024% |
| 1888 | 30 / #342 / 0.025% |
| 1887 | 18 / #403 / 0.018% |
| 1886 | 23 / #367 / 0.021% |
| 1885 | 34 / #289 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 21 / #395 / 0.018% |
| 1883 | 26 / #330 / 0.025% |
| 1882 | 31 / #312 / 0.027% |
| 1881 | 35 / #269 / 0.035% |
| 1880 | 25 / #349 / 0.023% |