Total babies named Scott (all years): 777,059
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 517 / #565 / 0.030% |
| 2023 | 473 / #601 / 0.028% |
| 2022 | 486 / #589 / 0.028% |
| 2021 | 457 / #609 / 0.026% |
| 2020 | 495 / #566 / 0.029% |
| 2019 | 544 / #524 / 0.030% |
| 2018 | 548 / #519 / 0.030% |
| 2017 | 606 / #483 / 0.033% |
| 2016 | 658 / #464 / 0.035% |
| 2015 | 667 / #454 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 727 / #423 / 0.038% |
| 2013 | 685 / #428 / 0.036% |
| 2012 | 778 / #382 / 0.041% |
| 2011 | 804 / #371 / 0.042% |
| 2010 | 872 / #352 / 0.045% |
| 2009 | 920 / #343 / 0.046% |
| 2008 | 1,034 / #321 / 0.051% |
| 2007 | 1,252 / #274 / 0.060% |
| 2006 | 1,365 / #253 / 0.066% |
| 2005 | 1,474 / #233 / 0.074% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,640 / #214 / 0.083% |
| 2003 | 1,771 / #206 / 0.090% |
| 2002 | 2,028 / #185 / 0.104% |
| 2001 | 2,296 / #167 / 0.118% |
| 2000 | 2,457 / #158 / 0.125% |
| 1999 | 2,720 / #140 / 0.142% |
| 1998 | 3,062 / #123 / 0.160% |
| 1997 | 3,344 / #113 / 0.177% |
| 1996 | 3,672 / #108 / 0.194% |
| 1995 | 4,083 / #92 / 0.214% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 4,914 / #80 / 0.254% |
| 1993 | 5,577 / #69 / 0.284% |
| 1992 | 6,448 / #61 / 0.323% |
| 1991 | 7,113 / #57 / 0.352% |
| 1990 | 8,086 / #53 / 0.394% |
| 1989 | 8,850 / #51 / 0.442% |
| 1988 | 9,354 / #47 / 0.489% |
| 1987 | 10,193 / #43 / 0.546% |
| 1986 | 9,966 / #44 / 0.541% |
| 1985 | 10,146 / #44 / 0.549% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 10,575 / #39 / 0.586% |
| 1983 | 10,847 / #38 / 0.605% |
| 1982 | 12,199 / #34 / 0.672% |
| 1981 | 12,721 / #34 / 0.710% |
| 1980 | 13,298 / #33 / 0.745% |
| 1979 | 14,441 / #29 / 0.839% |
| 1978 | 13,540 / #30 / 0.825% |
| 1977 | 14,207 / #27 / 0.865% |
| 1976 | 15,719 / #24 / 1.002% |
| 1975 | 17,310 / #17 / 1.109% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 18,031 / #18 / 1.147% |
| 1973 | 18,981 / #18 / 1.218% |
| 1972 | 22,840 / #11 / 1.408% |
| 1971 | 30,902 / #10 / 1.747% |
| 1970 | 28,572 / #12 / 1.537% |
| 1969 | 28,655 / #12 / 1.602% |
| 1968 | 26,024 / #14 / 1.497% |
| 1967 | 25,534 / #16 / 1.464% |
| 1966 | 26,036 / #16 / 1.460% |
| 1965 | 25,436 / #15 / 1.367% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 28,504 / #14 / 1.430% |
| 1963 | 30,401 / #12 / 1.497% |
| 1962 | 30,699 / #11 / 1.484% |
| 1961 | 23,941 / #19 / 1.127% |
| 1960 | 21,593 / #23 / 1.013% |
| 1959 | 19,765 / #24 / 0.926% |
| 1958 | 19,178 / #25 / 0.904% |
| 1957 | 15,749 / #32 / 0.730% |
| 1956 | 13,214 / #34 / 0.625% |
| 1955 | 10,782 / #38 / 0.523% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 9,457 / #40 / 0.464% |
| 1953 | 7,489 / #46 / 0.380% |
| 1952 | 6,538 / #54 / 0.336% |
| 1951 | 5,381 / #68 / 0.286% |
| 1950 | 4,268 / #82 / 0.238% |
| 1949 | 3,055 / #99 / 0.172% |
| 1948 | 2,299 / #122 / 0.131% |
| 1947 | 2,029 / #139 / 0.111% |
| 1946 | 1,522 / #155 / 0.094% |
| 1945 | 848 / #182 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 610 / #226 / 0.045% |
| 1943 | 540 / #262 / 0.038% |
| 1942 | 519 / #259 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 402 / #289 / 0.033% |
| 1940 | 338 / #304 / 0.029% |
| 1939 | 276 / #336 / 0.025% |
| 1938 | 259 / #347 / 0.023% |
| 1937 | 218 / #373 / 0.020% |
| 1936 | 218 / #369 / 0.021% |
| 1935 | 209 / #378 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 171 / #429 / 0.017% |
| 1933 | 168 / #424 / 0.017% |
| 1932 | 173 / #425 / 0.017% |
| 1931 | 139 / #485 / 0.013% |
| 1930 | 145 / #496 / 0.013% |
| 1929 | 164 / #460 / 0.015% |
| 1928 | 188 / #436 / 0.017% |
| 1927 | 176 / #463 / 0.016% |
| 1926 | 185 / #448 / 0.017% |
| 1925 | 184 / #443 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 206 / #426 / 0.018% |
| 1923 | 210 / #414 / 0.019% |
| 1922 | 199 / #427 / 0.018% |
| 1921 | 204 / #425 / 0.019% |
| 1920 | 192 / #436 / 0.018% |
| 1919 | 189 / #428 / 0.019% |
| 1918 | 161 / #468 / 0.016% |
| 1917 | 170 / #437 / 0.018% |
| 1916 | 147 / #474 / 0.017% |
| 1915 | 157 / #434 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 138 / #406 / 0.021% |
| 1913 | 116 / #399 / 0.023% |
| 1912 | 96 / #392 / 0.022% |
| 1911 | 61 / #354 / 0.027% |
| 1910 | 49 / #369 / 0.025% |
| 1909 | 39 / #396 / 0.024% |
| 1908 | 41 / #359 / 0.027% |
| 1907 | 40 / #349 / 0.027% |
| 1906 | 38 / #341 / 0.029% |
| 1905 | 28 / #408 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 35 / #343 / 0.027% |
| 1903 | 24 / #408 / 0.020% |
| 1902 | 36 / #330 / 0.029% |
| 1901 | 28 / #351 / 0.026% |
| 1900 | 39 / #353 / 0.026% |
| 1899 | 25 / #374 / 0.024% |
| 1898 | 30 / #359 / 0.024% |
| 1897 | 44 / #269 / 0.039% |
| 1896 | 31 / #351 / 0.026% |
| 1895 | 43 / #270 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 47 / #255 / 0.041% |
| 1893 | 36 / #290 / 0.032% |
| 1892 | 49 / #256 / 0.040% |
| 1891 | 35 / #276 / 0.035% |
| 1890 | 40 / #274 / 0.036% |
| 1889 | 46 / #241 / 0.042% |
| 1888 | 44 / #272 / 0.036% |
| 1887 | 38 / #267 / 0.037% |
| 1886 | 42 / #263 / 0.038% |
| 1885 | 52 / #229 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 56 / #226 / 0.049% |
| 1883 | 47 / #231 / 0.045% |
| 1882 | 48 / #244 / 0.042% |
| 1881 | 51 / #217 / 0.051% |
| 1880 | 60 / #206 / 0.054% |