Total babies named Saul (all years): 42,825
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 529 / #559 / 0.031% |
| 2023 | 515 / #568 / 0.030% |
| 2022 | 581 / #513 / 0.033% |
| 2021 | 513 / #556 / 0.029% |
| 2020 | 484 / #575 / 0.028% |
| 2019 | 538 / #533 / 0.030% |
| 2018 | 534 / #531 / 0.029% |
| 2017 | 605 / #485 / 0.033% |
| 2016 | 560 / #527 / 0.030% |
| 2015 | 592 / #495 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 663 / #450 / 0.035% |
| 2013 | 656 / #440 / 0.035% |
| 2012 | 690 / #414 / 0.036% |
| 2011 | 715 / #399 / 0.038% |
| 2010 | 761 / #379 / 0.040% |
| 2009 | 867 / #356 / 0.044% |
| 2008 | 999 / #329 / 0.049% |
| 2007 | 1,070 / #308 / 0.052% |
| 2006 | 1,120 / #298 / 0.055% |
| 2005 | 1,113 / #295 / 0.056% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,104 / #289 / 0.056% |
| 2003 | 1,072 / #292 / 0.054% |
| 2002 | 1,028 / #289 / 0.053% |
| 2001 | 1,103 / #278 / 0.057% |
| 2000 | 1,059 / #287 / 0.054% |
| 1999 | 891 / #318 / 0.046% |
| 1998 | 916 / #307 / 0.048% |
| 1997 | 1,045 / #270 / 0.055% |
| 1996 | 869 / #306 / 0.046% |
| 1995 | 713 / #346 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 598 / #389 / 0.031% |
| 1993 | 580 / #399 / 0.030% |
| 1992 | 616 / #375 / 0.031% |
| 1991 | 593 / #381 / 0.029% |
| 1990 | 567 / #409 / 0.028% |
| 1989 | 522 / #410 / 0.026% |
| 1988 | 435 / #432 / 0.023% |
| 1987 | 429 / #422 / 0.023% |
| 1986 | 411 / #424 / 0.022% |
| 1985 | 408 / #426 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 389 / #419 / 0.022% |
| 1983 | 379 / #421 / 0.021% |
| 1982 | 361 / #448 / 0.020% |
| 1981 | 411 / #402 / 0.023% |
| 1980 | 362 / #432 / 0.020% |
| 1979 | 351 / #427 / 0.020% |
| 1978 | 291 / #478 / 0.018% |
| 1977 | 324 / #444 / 0.020% |
| 1976 | 295 / #457 / 0.019% |
| 1975 | 279 / #479 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 267 / #491 / 0.017% |
| 1973 | 250 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1972 | 244 / #506 / 0.015% |
| 1971 | 193 / #598 / 0.011% |
| 1970 | 219 / #551 / 0.012% |
| 1969 | 193 / #565 / 0.011% |
| 1968 | 159 / #605 / 0.009% |
| 1967 | 159 / #597 / 0.009% |
| 1966 | 135 / #640 / 0.008% |
| 1965 | 167 / #590 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 123 / #697 / 0.006% |
| 1963 | 143 / #654 / 0.007% |
| 1962 | 144 / #646 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 169 / #610 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 128 / #695 / 0.006% |
| 1959 | 137 / #658 / 0.006% |
| 1958 | 154 / #620 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 138 / #654 / 0.006% |
| 1956 | 115 / #691 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 118 / #675 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 121 / #662 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 117 / #656 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 103 / #691 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 123 / #640 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 115 / #650 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 103 / #677 / 0.006% |
| 1948 | 104 / #665 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 112 / #655 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 101 / #641 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 85 / #656 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 79 / #700 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 97 / #648 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 107 / #610 / 0.008% |
| 1941 | 97 / #612 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 88 / #640 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 98 / #580 / 0.009% |
| 1938 | 123 / #526 / 0.011% |
| 1937 | 113 / #549 / 0.011% |
| 1936 | 120 / #517 / 0.012% |
| 1935 | 109 / #552 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 130 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1933 | 131 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1932 | 122 / #530 / 0.012% |
| 1931 | 138 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1930 | 149 / #487 / 0.014% |
| 1929 | 156 / #471 / 0.015% |
| 1928 | 179 / #450 / 0.016% |
| 1927 | 189 / #446 / 0.017% |
| 1926 | 189 / #440 / 0.017% |
| 1925 | 206 / #419 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 213 / #419 / 0.019% |
| 1923 | 225 / #398 / 0.021% |
| 1922 | 204 / #420 / 0.019% |
| 1921 | 229 / #403 / 0.021% |
| 1920 | 206 / #415 / 0.019% |
| 1919 | 232 / #382 / 0.024% |
| 1918 | 239 / #388 / 0.024% |
| 1917 | 228 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1916 | 222 / #366 / 0.025% |
| 1915 | 207 / #374 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 162 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1913 | 148 / #339 / 0.029% |
| 1912 | 125 / #340 / 0.029% |
| 1911 | 57 / #371 / 0.025% |
| 1910 | 42 / #419 / 0.022% |
| 1909 | 41 / #377 / 0.025% |
| 1908 | 35 / #402 / 0.023% |
| 1907 | 36 / #378 / 0.025% |
| 1906 | 18 / #563 / 0.014% |
| 1905 | 12 / #733 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 26 / #415 / 0.020% |
| 1903 | 17 / #547 / 0.014% |
| 1902 | 24 / #424 / 0.020% |
| 1901 | 13 / #588 / 0.012% |
| 1900 | 23 / #487 / 0.015% |
| 1899 | 17 / #475 / 0.016% |
| 1898 | 11 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1897 | 11 / #674 / 0.010% |
| 1896 | 11 / #716 / 0.009% |
| 1895 | 13 / #604 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 16 / #517 / 0.014% |
| 1893 | 9 / #760 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 11 / #679 / 0.009% |
| 1891 | 9 / #692 / 0.009% |
| 1890 | 7 / #870 / 0.006% |
| 1888 | 20 / #427 / 0.017% |
| 1887 | 11 / #578 / 0.011% |
| 1886 | 10 / #638 / 0.009% |
| 1885 | 11 / #600 / 0.010% |
| 1883 | 5 / #1020 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 15 / #486 / 0.013% |
| 1880 | 15 / #476 / 0.014% |