Total babies named Royal (all years): 23,603
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 738 / #427 / 0.043% |
| 2023 | 794 / #401 / 0.046% |
| 2022 | 878 / #370 / 0.050% |
| 2021 | 884 / #370 / 0.051% |
| 2020 | 738 / #405 / 0.043% |
| 2019 | 653 / #459 / 0.036% |
| 2018 | 610 / #482 / 0.034% |
| 2017 | 576 / #505 / 0.031% |
| 2016 | 662 / #461 / 0.035% |
| 2015 | 648 / #467 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 489 / #570 / 0.025% |
| 2013 | 234 / #893 / 0.012% |
| 2012 | 193 / #1016 / 0.010% |
| 2011 | 148 / #1196 / 0.008% |
| 2010 | 145 / #1226 / 0.008% |
| 2009 | 122 / #1402 / 0.006% |
| 2008 | 110 / #1491 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 115 / #1420 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 75 / #1837 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 68 / #1883 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 61 / #1986 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 53 / #2119 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 53 / #2062 / 0.003% |
| 2001 | 57 / #1930 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 50 / #2043 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 49 / #1987 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 52 / #1893 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 47 / #1955 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 49 / #1865 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 42 / #2018 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 52 / #1729 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 50 / #1735 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 43 / #1908 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 52 / #1629 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 66 / #1378 / 0.003% |
| 1989 | 44 / #1761 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 55 / #1420 / 0.003% |
| 1987 | 42 / #1651 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 48 / #1452 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 52 / #1349 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 41 / #1527 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 58 / #1198 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 55 / #1262 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 49 / #1359 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 52 / #1310 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 56 / #1240 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 60 / #1146 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 52 / #1240 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 49 / #1260 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 46 / #1274 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 49 / #1193 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 50 / #1172 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 59 / #1058 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 67 / #998 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 73 / #938 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 64 / #964 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 49 / #1063 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 67 / #884 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 66 / #894 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 78 / #835 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 78 / #867 / 0.004% |
| 1963 | 69 / #905 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 79 / #854 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 90 / #807 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 95 / #787 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 91 / #806 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 65 / #948 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 100 / #756 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 130 / #670 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 104 / #719 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 110 / #691 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 118 / #655 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 104 / #687 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 134 / #608 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 112 / #661 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 129 / #602 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 126 / #606 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 154 / #541 / 0.008% |
| 1946 | 120 / #588 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 144 / #499 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 135 / #527 / 0.010% |
| 1943 | 122 / #575 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 124 / #552 / 0.009% |
| 1941 | 108 / #574 / 0.009% |
| 1940 | 127 / #516 / 0.011% |
| 1939 | 112 / #542 / 0.010% |
| 1938 | 134 / #504 / 0.012% |
| 1937 | 131 / #503 / 0.012% |
| 1936 | 128 / #503 / 0.012% |
| 1935 | 123 / #521 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 127 / #521 / 0.012% |
| 1933 | 145 / #463 / 0.015% |
| 1932 | 149 / #472 / 0.014% |
| 1931 | 148 / #466 / 0.014% |
| 1930 | 158 / #472 / 0.014% |
| 1929 | 212 / #400 / 0.020% |
| 1928 | 182 / #444 / 0.016% |
| 1927 | 196 / #432 / 0.017% |
| 1926 | 181 / #452 / 0.016% |
| 1925 | 200 / #424 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 214 / #418 / 0.019% |
| 1923 | 226 / #396 / 0.021% |
| 1922 | 228 / #400 / 0.021% |
| 1921 | 191 / #447 / 0.017% |
| 1920 | 200 / #423 / 0.019% |
| 1919 | 202 / #410 / 0.021% |
| 1918 | 223 / #399 / 0.022% |
| 1917 | 186 / #414 / 0.020% |
| 1916 | 174 / #429 / 0.020% |
| 1915 | 157 / #433 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 125 / #432 / 0.019% |
| 1913 | 91 / #455 / 0.018% |
| 1912 | 100 / #384 / 0.023% |
| 1911 | 36 / #495 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 44 / #406 / 0.023% |
| 1909 | 41 / #376 / 0.025% |
| 1908 | 38 / #380 / 0.025% |
| 1907 | 28 / #445 / 0.019% |
| 1906 | 38 / #339 / 0.029% |
| 1905 | 30 / #389 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 30 / #377 / 0.023% |
| 1903 | 28 / #367 / 0.023% |
| 1902 | 31 / #358 / 0.025% |
| 1901 | 23 / #398 / 0.022% |
| 1900 | 25 / #466 / 0.017% |
| 1899 | 28 / #344 / 0.026% |
| 1898 | 26 / #389 / 0.021% |
| 1897 | 20 / #433 / 0.018% |
| 1896 | 26 / #386 / 0.022% |
| 1895 | 32 / #328 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 23 / #396 / 0.020% |
| 1893 | 38 / #285 / 0.034% |
| 1892 | 42 / #283 / 0.034% |
| 1891 | 33 / #288 / 0.033% |
| 1890 | 31 / #315 / 0.028% |
| 1889 | 37 / #279 / 0.033% |
| 1888 | 40 / #285 / 0.033% |
| 1887 | 24 / #339 / 0.024% |
| 1886 | 19 / #414 / 0.017% |
| 1885 | 28 / #324 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 32 / #311 / 0.028% |
| 1883 | 21 / #379 / 0.020% |
| 1882 | 27 / #345 / 0.024% |
| 1881 | 20 / #385 / 0.020% |
| 1880 | 26 / #340 / 0.024% |