Total babies named Rosella (all years): 15,914
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 79 / #2335 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 81 / #2282 / 0.005% |
| 2022 | 55 / #3021 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 64 / #2703 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 64 / #2652 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 60 / #2810 / 0.004% |
| 2018 | 58 / #2897 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 63 / #2735 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 48 / #3368 / 0.003% |
| 2015 | 44 / #3583 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 50 / #3265 / 0.003% |
| 2013 | 41 / #3766 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 46 / #3516 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 28 / #5034 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 33 / #4478 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 36 / #4259 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 24 / #5918 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 32 / #4646 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 29 / #4928 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 20 / #6193 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 22 / #5717 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 24 / #5206 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 21 / #5633 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 15 / #7247 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 15 / #7079 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 16 / #6425 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 20 / #5309 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 11 / #8211 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 16 / #5998 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 22 / #4647 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 16 / #5921 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 12 / #7368 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 14 / #6573 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 27 / #3913 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 16 / #5770 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 16 / #5488 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 17 / #5011 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 21 / #4097 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 23 / #3735 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 13 / #5585 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 16 / #4679 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 21 / #3782 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 26 / #3323 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 19 / #4131 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 31 / #2929 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 19 / #4007 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 28 / #2917 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 28 / #2892 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 21 / #3381 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 23 / #3134 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 25 / #2893 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 40 / #2053 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 39 / #2045 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 57 / #1637 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 38 / #2149 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 36 / #2129 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 53 / #1591 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 45 / #1723 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 37 / #1905 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 50 / #1590 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 53 / #1574 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 63 / #1414 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 64 / #1390 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 58 / #1480 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 63 / #1392 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 81 / #1190 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 70 / #1274 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 67 / #1299 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 74 / #1218 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 94 / #1039 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 73 / #1178 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 97 / #972 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 110 / #882 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 108 / #866 / 0.006% |
| 1950 | 132 / #753 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 119 / #796 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 117 / #798 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 166 / #647 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 147 / #654 / 0.009% |
| 1945 | 138 / #620 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 147 / #609 / 0.011% |
| 1943 | 163 / #591 / 0.012% |
| 1942 | 171 / #565 / 0.013% |
| 1941 | 178 / #523 / 0.015% |
| 1940 | 200 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1939 | 226 / #447 / 0.021% |
| 1938 | 223 / #452 / 0.020% |
| 1937 | 220 / #444 / 0.021% |
| 1936 | 247 / #409 / 0.024% |
| 1935 | 268 / #392 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 255 / #411 / 0.024% |
| 1933 | 275 / #389 / 0.027% |
| 1932 | 295 / #380 / 0.028% |
| 1931 | 309 / #366 / 0.029% |
| 1930 | 363 / #344 / 0.032% |
| 1929 | 335 / #364 / 0.030% |
| 1928 | 360 / #363 / 0.031% |
| 1927 | 392 / #337 / 0.033% |
| 1926 | 426 / #321 / 0.036% |
| 1925 | 377 / #348 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 435 / #320 / 0.035% |
| 1923 | 382 / #336 / 0.032% |
| 1922 | 410 / #323 / 0.034% |
| 1921 | 425 / #318 / 0.034% |
| 1920 | 406 / #322 / 0.034% |
| 1919 | 374 / #329 / 0.033% |
| 1918 | 420 / #313 / 0.036% |
| 1917 | 398 / #308 / 0.037% |
| 1916 | 387 / #307 / 0.037% |
| 1915 | 357 / #311 / 0.036% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 237 / #343 / 0.031% |
| 1913 | 225 / #320 / 0.036% |
| 1912 | 186 / #334 / 0.033% |
| 1911 | 140 / #335 / 0.033% |
| 1910 | 123 / #359 / 0.031% |
| 1909 | 117 / #335 / 0.034% |
| 1908 | 119 / #324 / 0.036% |
| 1907 | 112 / #331 / 0.035% |
| 1906 | 106 / #329 / 0.036% |
| 1905 | 83 / #375 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 93 / #338 / 0.034% |
| 1903 | 84 / #345 / 0.032% |
| 1902 | 72 / #376 / 0.027% |
| 1901 | 80 / #343 / 0.033% |
| 1900 | 94 / #343 / 0.031% |
| 1899 | 46 / #432 / 0.020% |
| 1898 | 79 / #350 / 0.031% |
| 1897 | 55 / #394 / 0.023% |
| 1896 | 47 / #422 / 0.020% |
| 1895 | 53 / #389 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 61 / #358 / 0.027% |
| 1893 | 41 / #428 / 0.019% |
| 1892 | 53 / #368 / 0.025% |
| 1891 | 34 / #438 / 0.018% |
| 1890 | 33 / #459 / 0.017% |
| 1889 | 30 / #452 / 0.017% |
| 1888 | 38 / #402 / 0.021% |
| 1887 | 28 / #420 / 0.019% |
| 1886 | 22 / #474 / 0.015% |
| 1885 | 29 / #385 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 27 / #388 / 0.021% |
| 1883 | 25 / #371 / 0.022% |
| 1882 | 18 / #443 / 0.017% |
| 1881 | 12 / #500 / 0.013% |
| 1880 | 25 / #325 / 0.027% |