Total babies named Roger (all years): 443,528
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 340 / #750 / 0.020% |
| 2023 | 343 / #760 / 0.020% |
| 2022 | 342 / #749 / 0.020% |
| 2021 | 388 / #685 / 0.022% |
| 2020 | 375 / #685 / 0.022% |
| 2019 | 362 / #694 / 0.020% |
| 2018 | 413 / #637 / 0.023% |
| 2017 | 417 / #627 / 0.023% |
| 2016 | 409 / #645 / 0.022% |
| 2015 | 479 / #581 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 477 / #583 / 0.025% |
| 2013 | 476 / #556 / 0.025% |
| 2012 | 459 / #564 / 0.024% |
| 2011 | 477 / #535 / 0.025% |
| 2010 | 504 / #510 / 0.026% |
| 2009 | 550 / #497 / 0.028% |
| 2008 | 598 / #462 / 0.029% |
| 2007 | 582 / #468 / 0.028% |
| 2006 | 594 / #456 / 0.029% |
| 2005 | 644 / #417 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 630 / #413 / 0.032% |
| 2003 | 664 / #394 / 0.034% |
| 2002 | 676 / #386 / 0.035% |
| 2001 | 719 / #369 / 0.037% |
| 2000 | 703 / #372 / 0.036% |
| 1999 | 730 / #358 / 0.038% |
| 1998 | 769 / #347 / 0.040% |
| 1997 | 804 / #327 / 0.043% |
| 1996 | 957 / #285 / 0.051% |
| 1995 | 1,002 / #278 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 1,071 / #264 / 0.055% |
| 1993 | 1,132 / #253 / 0.058% |
| 1992 | 1,440 / #214 / 0.072% |
| 1991 | 1,294 / #231 / 0.064% |
| 1990 | 1,456 / #211 / 0.071% |
| 1989 | 1,477 / #196 / 0.074% |
| 1988 | 1,578 / #180 / 0.082% |
| 1987 | 1,559 / #176 / 0.084% |
| 1986 | 1,608 / #167 / 0.087% |
| 1985 | 1,706 / #159 / 0.092% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,719 / #157 / 0.095% |
| 1983 | 1,870 / #144 / 0.104% |
| 1982 | 2,167 / #127 / 0.119% |
| 1981 | 2,244 / #120 / 0.125% |
| 1980 | 2,074 / #134 / 0.116% |
| 1979 | 2,024 / #132 / 0.118% |
| 1978 | 2,143 / #120 / 0.131% |
| 1977 | 2,313 / #114 / 0.141% |
| 1976 | 2,465 / #103 / 0.157% |
| 1975 | 2,619 / #97 / 0.168% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 2,754 / #93 / 0.175% |
| 1973 | 3,154 / #85 / 0.202% |
| 1972 | 3,534 / #75 / 0.218% |
| 1971 | 4,128 / #71 / 0.233% |
| 1970 | 4,584 / #61 / 0.247% |
| 1969 | 4,905 / #59 / 0.274% |
| 1968 | 5,185 / #55 / 0.298% |
| 1967 | 5,721 / #53 / 0.328% |
| 1966 | 6,297 / #51 / 0.353% |
| 1965 | 6,432 / #49 / 0.346% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 7,387 / #49 / 0.371% |
| 1963 | 7,743 / #53 / 0.381% |
| 1962 | 9,077 / #47 / 0.439% |
| 1961 | 9,651 / #47 / 0.454% |
| 1960 | 9,043 / #47 / 0.424% |
| 1959 | 8,794 / #47 / 0.412% |
| 1958 | 8,368 / #47 / 0.394% |
| 1957 | 9,865 / #42 / 0.457% |
| 1956 | 10,151 / #41 / 0.480% |
| 1955 | 10,982 / #37 / 0.533% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 11,716 / #34 / 0.575% |
| 1953 | 13,171 / #31 / 0.668% |
| 1952 | 12,132 / #30 / 0.624% |
| 1951 | 12,425 / #29 / 0.660% |
| 1950 | 12,552 / #27 / 0.701% |
| 1949 | 12,821 / #25 / 0.723% |
| 1948 | 12,818 / #24 / 0.731% |
| 1947 | 12,760 / #25 / 0.697% |
| 1946 | 12,410 / #23 / 0.764% |
| 1945 | 10,570 / #22 / 0.785% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 10,581 / #23 / 0.776% |
| 1943 | 10,772 / #24 / 0.755% |
| 1942 | 9,174 / #25 / 0.664% |
| 1941 | 8,094 / #25 / 0.659% |
| 1940 | 7,597 / #26 / 0.655% |
| 1939 | 7,155 / #28 / 0.646% |
| 1938 | 6,551 / #31 / 0.591% |
| 1937 | 5,712 / #36 / 0.536% |
| 1936 | 5,701 / #35 / 0.550% |
| 1935 | 5,152 / #36 / 0.495% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 4,765 / #39 / 0.461% |
| 1933 | 3,917 / #48 / 0.395% |
| 1932 | 3,788 / #50 / 0.363% |
| 1931 | 3,625 / #53 / 0.349% |
| 1930 | 3,246 / #58 / 0.296% |
| 1929 | 2,928 / #64 / 0.272% |
| 1928 | 2,774 / #71 / 0.250% |
| 1927 | 2,408 / #84 / 0.214% |
| 1926 | 2,260 / #89 / 0.204% |
| 1925 | 2,099 / #90 / 0.188% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 2,054 / #93 / 0.181% |
| 1923 | 1,888 / #95 / 0.172% |
| 1922 | 1,848 / #96 / 0.170% |
| 1921 | 1,803 / #99 / 0.164% |
| 1920 | 1,691 / #103 / 0.159% |
| 1919 | 1,298 / #124 / 0.132% |
| 1918 | 1,426 / #116 / 0.141% |
| 1917 | 1,249 / #119 / 0.135% |
| 1916 | 1,087 / #129 / 0.122% |
| 1915 | 1,086 / #124 / 0.128% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 816 / #126 / 0.125% |
| 1913 | 565 / #138 / 0.110% |
| 1912 | 464 / #138 / 0.108% |
| 1911 | 241 / #139 / 0.107% |
| 1910 | 176 / #171 / 0.091% |
| 1909 | 128 / #180 / 0.078% |
| 1908 | 115 / #186 / 0.075% |
| 1907 | 127 / #170 / 0.087% |
| 1906 | 94 / #194 / 0.071% |
| 1905 | 73 / #225 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 91 / #194 / 0.071% |
| 1903 | 86 / #188 / 0.072% |
| 1902 | 73 / #210 / 0.060% |
| 1901 | 60 / #227 / 0.056% |
| 1900 | 81 / #221 / 0.054% |
| 1899 | 67 / #199 / 0.063% |
| 1898 | 74 / #202 / 0.060% |
| 1897 | 58 / #230 / 0.051% |
| 1896 | 70 / #215 / 0.059% |
| 1895 | 69 / #207 / 0.059% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 58 / #225 / 0.050% |
| 1893 | 49 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1892 | 55 / #241 / 0.045% |
| 1891 | 55 / #217 / 0.054% |
| 1890 | 52 / #232 / 0.047% |
| 1889 | 49 / #232 / 0.044% |
| 1888 | 47 / #259 / 0.039% |
| 1887 | 39 / #259 / 0.038% |
| 1886 | 32 / #308 / 0.029% |
| 1885 | 27 / #331 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 39 / #277 / 0.034% |
| 1883 | 23 / #355 / 0.022% |
| 1882 | 32 / #310 / 0.028% |
| 1881 | 29 / #305 / 0.029% |
| 1880 | 25 / #348 / 0.023% |