Total babies named Richard (all years): 2,585,535
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,539 / #232 / 0.090% |
| 2023 | 1,645 / #221 / 0.096% |
| 2022 | 1,684 / #219 / 0.097% |
| 2021 | 1,782 / #216 / 0.102% |
| 2020 | 1,826 / #208 / 0.106% |
| 2019 | 1,989 / #197 / 0.111% |
| 2018 | 2,137 / #187 / 0.118% |
| 2017 | 2,284 / #175 / 0.123% |
| 2016 | 2,523 / #161 / 0.133% |
| 2015 | 2,687 / #155 / 0.140% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,887 / #141 / 0.150% |
| 2013 | 2,799 / #140 / 0.148% |
| 2012 | 3,028 / #123 / 0.160% |
| 2011 | 3,165 / #127 / 0.167% |
| 2010 | 3,238 / #125 / 0.169% |
| 2009 | 3,612 / #114 / 0.182% |
| 2008 | 4,060 / #108 / 0.199% |
| 2007 | 4,425 / #101 / 0.213% |
| 2006 | 4,469 / #99 / 0.217% |
| 2005 | 4,667 / #94 / 0.234% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 4,848 / #92 / 0.244% |
| 2003 | 5,054 / #86 / 0.256% |
| 2002 | 5,322 / #77 / 0.274% |
| 2001 | 5,771 / #73 / 0.297% |
| 2000 | 6,354 / #65 / 0.324% |
| 1999 | 6,501 / #61 / 0.339% |
| 1998 | 6,954 / #56 / 0.364% |
| 1997 | 7,242 / #51 / 0.384% |
| 1996 | 8,180 / #45 / 0.432% |
| 1995 | 8,784 / #42 / 0.461% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 9,516 / #41 / 0.493% |
| 1993 | 10,231 / #40 / 0.522% |
| 1992 | 11,331 / #41 / 0.567% |
| 1991 | 12,555 / #34 / 0.621% |
| 1990 | 13,580 / #35 / 0.661% |
| 1989 | 14,133 / #33 / 0.706% |
| 1988 | 14,145 / #32 / 0.739% |
| 1987 | 14,402 / #30 / 0.771% |
| 1986 | 15,012 / #29 / 0.815% |
| 1985 | 15,328 / #28 / 0.829% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 15,607 / #27 / 0.865% |
| 1983 | 15,891 / #27 / 0.886% |
| 1982 | 16,720 / #27 / 0.921% |
| 1981 | 16,855 / #27 / 0.941% |
| 1980 | 16,657 / #26 / 0.934% |
| 1979 | 16,713 / #25 / 0.971% |
| 1978 | 16,733 / #21 / 1.019% |
| 1977 | 17,442 / #20 / 1.061% |
| 1976 | 16,753 / #19 / 1.068% |
| 1975 | 17,688 / #16 / 1.133% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 18,636 / #17 / 1.185% |
| 1973 | 19,943 / #16 / 1.279% |
| 1972 | 22,303 / #14 / 1.375% |
| 1971 | 26,157 / #11 / 1.479% |
| 1970 | 30,440 / #10 / 1.638% |
| 1969 | 31,087 / #10 / 1.738% |
| 1968 | 32,977 / #8 / 1.897% |
| 1967 | 33,583 / #8 / 1.926% |
| 1966 | 34,458 / #8 / 1.932% |
| 1965 | 36,826 / #8 / 1.980% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 40,100 / #8 / 2.012% |
| 1963 | 40,767 / #8 / 2.007% |
| 1962 | 39,418 / #8 / 1.905% |
| 1961 | 41,140 / #8 / 1.937% |
| 1960 | 43,538 / #8 / 2.042% |
| 1959 | 47,204 / #8 / 2.211% |
| 1958 | 49,999 / #8 / 2.356% |
| 1957 | 52,446 / #8 / 2.431% |
| 1956 | 52,912 / #7 / 2.501% |
| 1955 | 53,564 / #7 / 2.600% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 57,043 / #7 / 2.798% |
| 1953 | 58,389 / #7 / 2.960% |
| 1952 | 58,353 / #7 / 3.002% |
| 1951 | 54,539 / #7 / 2.897% |
| 1950 | 51,004 / #7 / 2.849% |
| 1949 | 50,947 / #7 / 2.872% |
| 1948 | 50,969 / #7 / 2.905% |
| 1947 | 58,531 / #5 / 3.199% |
| 1946 | 58,871 / #5 / 3.625% |
| 1945 | 46,045 / #5 / 3.421% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 45,643 / #5 / 3.349% |
| 1943 | 46,338 / #5 / 3.247% |
| 1942 | 43,592 / #5 / 3.156% |
| 1941 | 39,111 / #5 / 3.184% |
| 1940 | 37,425 / #5 / 3.229% |
| 1939 | 35,385 / #5 / 3.197% |
| 1938 | 34,386 / #5 / 3.100% |
| 1937 | 32,975 / #5 / 3.092% |
| 1936 | 33,492 / #5 / 3.229% |
| 1935 | 33,947 / #5 / 3.260% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 33,167 / #5 / 3.212% |
| 1933 | 31,331 / #5 / 3.160% |
| 1932 | 31,809 / #5 / 3.046% |
| 1931 | 31,823 / #5 / 3.061% |
| 1930 | 32,186 / #5 / 2.933% |
| 1929 | 29,570 / #6 / 2.749% |
| 1928 | 28,794 / #6 / 2.600% |
| 1927 | 26,768 / #6 / 2.375% |
| 1926 | 25,143 / #7 / 2.264% |
| 1925 | 23,269 / #8 / 2.085% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 21,244 / #8 / 1.875% |
| 1923 | 18,887 / #9 / 1.723% |
| 1922 | 17,537 / #9 / 1.612% |
| 1921 | 16,376 / #10 / 1.487% |
| 1920 | 15,010 / #10 / 1.410% |
| 1919 | 12,441 / #12 / 1.269% |
| 1918 | 12,323 / #12 / 1.216% |
| 1917 | 10,914 / #14 / 1.179% |
| 1916 | 10,134 / #15 / 1.139% |
| 1915 | 9,143 / #15 / 1.077% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 6,669 / #17 / 1.019% |
| 1913 | 5,107 / #19 / 0.996% |
| 1912 | 4,188 / #19 / 0.974% |
| 1911 | 2,030 / #20 / 0.898% |
| 1910 | 1,654 / #21 / 0.852% |
| 1909 | 1,427 / #21 / 0.870% |
| 1908 | 1,244 / #23 / 0.806% |
| 1907 | 1,235 / #22 / 0.841% |
| 1906 | 1,084 / #23 / 0.814% |
| 1905 | 1,033 / #22 / 0.781% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 957 / #24 / 0.747% |
| 1903 | 862 / #26 / 0.723% |
| 1902 | 908 / #26 / 0.740% |
| 1901 | 784 / #26 / 0.736% |
| 1900 | 1,141 / #24 / 0.758% |
| 1899 | 744 / #28 / 0.700% |
| 1898 | 871 / #26 / 0.710% |
| 1897 | 702 / #31 / 0.623% |
| 1896 | 834 / #26 / 0.698% |
| 1895 | 727 / #31 / 0.619% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 808 / #25 / 0.698% |
| 1893 | 732 / #26 / 0.652% |
| 1892 | 802 / #27 / 0.657% |
| 1891 | 609 / #27 / 0.602% |
| 1890 | 743 / #25 / 0.669% |
| 1889 | 711 / #24 / 0.643% |
| 1888 | 772 / #26 / 0.639% |
| 1887 | 622 / #25 / 0.613% |
| 1886 | 720 / #23 / 0.650% |
| 1885 | 672 / #26 / 0.623% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 749 / #23 / 0.654% |
| 1883 | 649 / #21 / 0.620% |
| 1882 | 746 / #22 / 0.656% |
| 1881 | 641 / #22 / 0.636% |
| 1880 | 728 / #23 / 0.659% |