Total babies named Rhoda (all years): 26,021
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 58 / #2870 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 48 / #3369 / 0.003% |
| 2022 | 51 / #3204 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 57 / #2955 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 46 / #3381 / 0.003% |
| 2019 | 46 / #3437 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 47 / #3384 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 43 / #3611 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 52 / #3175 / 0.003% |
| 2015 | 48 / #3380 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 41 / #3766 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 38 / #3988 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 33 / #4466 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 32 / #4550 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 50 / #3296 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 35 / #4352 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 43 / #3767 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 33 / #4547 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 36 / #4143 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 37 / #3931 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 45 / #3381 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 34 / #4020 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 36 / #3712 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 39 / #3476 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 41 / #3323 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 42 / #3140 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 42 / #3059 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 50 / #2583 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 39 / #3079 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 34 / #3344 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 30 / #3685 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 36 / #3207 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 37 / #3128 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 58 / #2262 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 48 / #2510 / 0.003% |
| 1989 | 42 / #2707 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 35 / #2963 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 32 / #3016 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 53 / #2046 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 49 / #2164 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 53 / #1953 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 47 / #2122 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 56 / #1915 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 68 / #1692 / 0.004% |
| 1980 | 75 / #1567 / 0.005% |
| 1979 | 76 / #1540 / 0.005% |
| 1978 | 80 / #1449 / 0.005% |
| 1977 | 94 / #1272 / 0.006% |
| 1976 | 115 / #1069 / 0.008% |
| 1975 | 182 / #777 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 162 / #826 / 0.011% |
| 1973 | 132 / #930 / 0.009% |
| 1972 | 128 / #956 / 0.008% |
| 1971 | 129 / #982 / 0.008% |
| 1970 | 117 / #1050 / 0.007% |
| 1969 | 132 / #925 / 0.008% |
| 1968 | 143 / #857 / 0.009% |
| 1967 | 161 / #785 / 0.010% |
| 1966 | 234 / #622 / 0.014% |
| 1965 | 225 / #657 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 221 / #694 / 0.012% |
| 1963 | 189 / #750 / 0.010% |
| 1962 | 181 / #773 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 212 / #713 / 0.011% |
| 1960 | 227 / #676 / 0.011% |
| 1959 | 259 / #620 / 0.013% |
| 1958 | 264 / #613 / 0.013% |
| 1957 | 356 / #505 / 0.017% |
| 1956 | 241 / #616 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 239 / #598 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 233 / #593 / 0.012% |
| 1953 | 253 / #550 / 0.013% |
| 1952 | 230 / #569 / 0.012% |
| 1951 | 262 / #513 / 0.015% |
| 1950 | 278 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1949 | 271 / #489 / 0.016% |
| 1948 | 251 / #523 / 0.015% |
| 1947 | 287 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1946 | 271 / #479 / 0.017% |
| 1945 | 227 / #478 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 276 / #433 / 0.021% |
| 1943 | 306 / #420 / 0.022% |
| 1942 | 331 / #392 / 0.025% |
| 1941 | 284 / #406 / 0.024% |
| 1940 | 315 / #371 / 0.028% |
| 1939 | 348 / #341 / 0.032% |
| 1938 | 360 / #334 / 0.033% |
| 1937 | 341 / #344 / 0.032% |
| 1936 | 376 / #313 / 0.036% |
| 1935 | 405 / #306 / 0.039% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 425 / #304 / 0.041% |
| 1933 | 378 / #321 / 0.038% |
| 1932 | 420 / #308 / 0.039% |
| 1931 | 486 / #283 / 0.046% |
| 1930 | 497 / #297 / 0.044% |
| 1929 | 483 / #300 / 0.043% |
| 1928 | 504 / #297 / 0.044% |
| 1927 | 455 / #314 / 0.038% |
| 1926 | 547 / #282 / 0.046% |
| 1925 | 514 / #297 / 0.042% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 503 / #298 / 0.040% |
| 1923 | 436 / #309 / 0.036% |
| 1922 | 463 / #297 / 0.039% |
| 1921 | 430 / #313 / 0.035% |
| 1920 | 421 / #318 / 0.035% |
| 1919 | 420 / #308 / 0.037% |
| 1918 | 433 / #306 / 0.037% |
| 1917 | 345 / #335 / 0.032% |
| 1916 | 385 / #308 / 0.037% |
| 1915 | 385 / #297 / 0.039% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 266 / #324 / 0.035% |
| 1913 | 189 / #350 / 0.030% |
| 1912 | 189 / #330 / 0.034% |
| 1911 | 161 / #311 / 0.038% |
| 1910 | 170 / #296 / 0.043% |
| 1909 | 136 / #314 / 0.039% |
| 1908 | 108 / #341 / 0.032% |
| 1907 | 138 / #299 / 0.043% |
| 1906 | 132 / #291 / 0.045% |
| 1905 | 145 / #275 / 0.050% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 116 / #301 / 0.042% |
| 1903 | 122 / #287 / 0.047% |
| 1902 | 152 / #255 / 0.058% |
| 1901 | 125 / #260 / 0.052% |
| 1900 | 151 / #266 / 0.050% |
| 1899 | 127 / #250 / 0.055% |
| 1898 | 148 / #243 / 0.057% |
| 1897 | 127 / #253 / 0.054% |
| 1896 | 130 / #249 / 0.055% |
| 1895 | 136 / #237 / 0.058% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 136 / #230 / 0.061% |
| 1893 | 136 / #224 / 0.064% |
| 1892 | 140 / #220 / 0.066% |
| 1891 | 138 / #198 / 0.074% |
| 1890 | 138 / #202 / 0.072% |
| 1889 | 148 / #187 / 0.083% |
| 1888 | 130 / #196 / 0.073% |
| 1887 | 104 / #199 / 0.071% |
| 1886 | 114 / #189 / 0.079% |
| 1885 | 106 / #181 / 0.080% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 93 / #192 / 0.072% |
| 1883 | 93 / #173 / 0.083% |
| 1882 | 79 / #178 / 0.073% |
| 1881 | 84 / #161 / 0.091% |
| 1880 | 73 / #176 / 0.080% |