Total babies named Reginald (all years): 112,157
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 176 / #1178 / 0.010% |
| 2023 | 192 / #1107 / 0.011% |
| 2022 | 207 / #1064 / 0.012% |
| 2021 | 211 / #1032 / 0.012% |
| 2020 | 216 / #989 / 0.013% |
| 2019 | 249 / #884 / 0.014% |
| 2018 | 267 / #835 / 0.015% |
| 2017 | 263 / #841 / 0.014% |
| 2016 | 278 / #821 / 0.015% |
| 2015 | 253 / #882 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 285 / #807 / 0.015% |
| 2013 | 351 / #684 / 0.019% |
| 2012 | 360 / #659 / 0.019% |
| 2011 | 359 / #654 / 0.019% |
| 2010 | 403 / #615 / 0.021% |
| 2009 | 429 / #603 / 0.022% |
| 2008 | 472 / #558 / 0.023% |
| 2007 | 493 / #525 / 0.024% |
| 2006 | 500 / #516 / 0.024% |
| 2005 | 494 / #501 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 502 / #491 / 0.025% |
| 2003 | 531 / #473 / 0.027% |
| 2002 | 583 / #425 / 0.030% |
| 2001 | 567 / #429 / 0.029% |
| 2000 | 700 / #373 / 0.036% |
| 1999 | 682 / #381 / 0.036% |
| 1998 | 736 / #355 / 0.039% |
| 1997 | 763 / #340 / 0.040% |
| 1996 | 818 / #323 / 0.043% |
| 1995 | 863 / #304 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 929 / #296 / 0.048% |
| 1993 | 1,143 / #251 / 0.058% |
| 1992 | 1,230 / #235 / 0.062% |
| 1991 | 1,276 / #233 / 0.063% |
| 1990 | 1,284 / #230 / 0.063% |
| 1989 | 1,298 / #215 / 0.065% |
| 1988 | 1,333 / #202 / 0.070% |
| 1987 | 1,336 / #196 / 0.072% |
| 1986 | 1,350 / #188 / 0.073% |
| 1985 | 1,312 / #192 / 0.071% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,336 / #186 / 0.074% |
| 1983 | 1,268 / #193 / 0.071% |
| 1982 | 1,378 / #184 / 0.076% |
| 1981 | 1,409 / #179 / 0.079% |
| 1980 | 1,480 / #166 / 0.083% |
| 1979 | 1,655 / #157 / 0.096% |
| 1978 | 1,515 / #160 / 0.092% |
| 1977 | 1,521 / #157 / 0.093% |
| 1976 | 1,427 / #163 / 0.091% |
| 1975 | 1,499 / #162 / 0.096% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,610 / #152 / 0.102% |
| 1973 | 1,630 / #152 / 0.105% |
| 1972 | 1,912 / #141 / 0.118% |
| 1971 | 2,115 / #141 / 0.120% |
| 1970 | 2,307 / #142 / 0.124% |
| 1969 | 2,422 / #125 / 0.135% |
| 1968 | 2,552 / #117 / 0.147% |
| 1967 | 2,402 / #126 / 0.138% |
| 1966 | 2,330 / #131 / 0.131% |
| 1965 | 2,469 / #128 / 0.133% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 2,619 / #128 / 0.131% |
| 1963 | 2,571 / #132 / 0.127% |
| 1962 | 2,646 / #133 / 0.128% |
| 1961 | 2,469 / #144 / 0.116% |
| 1960 | 2,442 / #143 / 0.115% |
| 1959 | 2,421 / #144 / 0.113% |
| 1958 | 2,492 / #141 / 0.117% |
| 1957 | 2,418 / #142 / 0.112% |
| 1956 | 2,223 / #144 / 0.105% |
| 1955 | 2,075 / #144 / 0.101% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,812 / #158 / 0.089% |
| 1953 | 1,640 / #165 / 0.083% |
| 1952 | 1,494 / #176 / 0.077% |
| 1951 | 1,466 / #174 / 0.078% |
| 1950 | 1,297 / #175 / 0.072% |
| 1949 | 1,092 / #189 / 0.062% |
| 1948 | 941 / #206 / 0.054% |
| 1947 | 896 / #214 / 0.049% |
| 1946 | 719 / #223 / 0.044% |
| 1945 | 587 / #228 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 567 / #237 / 0.042% |
| 1943 | 613 / #236 / 0.043% |
| 1942 | 632 / #226 / 0.046% |
| 1941 | 530 / #242 / 0.043% |
| 1940 | 514 / #236 / 0.044% |
| 1939 | 403 / #273 / 0.036% |
| 1938 | 409 / #273 / 0.037% |
| 1937 | 389 / #276 / 0.036% |
| 1936 | 375 / #279 / 0.036% |
| 1935 | 350 / #291 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 375 / #279 / 0.036% |
| 1933 | 341 / #286 / 0.034% |
| 1932 | 375 / #282 / 0.036% |
| 1931 | 423 / #267 / 0.041% |
| 1930 | 424 / #276 / 0.039% |
| 1929 | 437 / #267 / 0.041% |
| 1928 | 401 / #281 / 0.036% |
| 1927 | 446 / #270 / 0.040% |
| 1926 | 475 / #257 / 0.043% |
| 1925 | 429 / #276 / 0.038% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 348 / #306 / 0.031% |
| 1923 | 335 / #314 / 0.031% |
| 1922 | 283 / #352 / 0.026% |
| 1921 | 271 / #367 / 0.025% |
| 1920 | 274 / #359 / 0.026% |
| 1919 | 244 / #370 / 0.025% |
| 1918 | 278 / #345 / 0.027% |
| 1917 | 261 / #343 / 0.028% |
| 1916 | 243 / #346 / 0.027% |
| 1915 | 244 / #338 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 200 / #323 / 0.031% |
| 1913 | 180 / #297 / 0.035% |
| 1912 | 134 / #323 / 0.031% |
| 1911 | 86 / #285 / 0.038% |
| 1910 | 59 / #323 / 0.030% |
| 1909 | 56 / #310 / 0.034% |
| 1908 | 47 / #329 / 0.030% |
| 1907 | 47 / #312 / 0.032% |
| 1906 | 47 / #301 / 0.035% |
| 1905 | 53 / #273 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 40 / #319 / 0.031% |
| 1903 | 48 / #268 / 0.040% |
| 1902 | 43 / #290 / 0.035% |
| 1901 | 31 / #322 / 0.029% |
| 1900 | 27 / #440 / 0.018% |
| 1899 | 25 / #373 / 0.024% |
| 1898 | 22 / #430 / 0.018% |
| 1897 | 18 / #471 / 0.016% |
| 1896 | 30 / #355 / 0.025% |
| 1895 | 26 / #380 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 22 / #407 / 0.019% |
| 1893 | 23 / #381 / 0.020% |
| 1892 | 24 / #392 / 0.020% |
| 1891 | 22 / #370 / 0.022% |
| 1890 | 19 / #421 / 0.017% |
| 1889 | 14 / #516 / 0.013% |
| 1888 | 14 / #549 / 0.012% |
| 1887 | 11 / #576 / 0.011% |
| 1886 | 15 / #487 / 0.014% |
| 1885 | 16 / #476 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 16 / #483 / 0.014% |
| 1883 | 12 / #550 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 7 / #817 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 12 / #525 / 0.012% |
| 1880 | 14 / #500 / 0.013% |