Total babies named Ray (all years): 209,970
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 322 / #779 / 0.019% |
| 2023 | 336 / #765 / 0.020% |
| 2022 | 332 / #762 / 0.019% |
| 2021 | 282 / #843 / 0.016% |
| 2020 | 343 / #725 / 0.020% |
| 2019 | 328 / #736 / 0.018% |
| 2018 | 330 / #728 / 0.018% |
| 2017 | 306 / #769 / 0.017% |
| 2016 | 324 / #753 / 0.017% |
| 2015 | 348 / #713 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 329 / #728 / 0.017% |
| 2013 | 363 / #666 / 0.019% |
| 2012 | 327 / #719 / 0.017% |
| 2011 | 346 / #682 / 0.018% |
| 2010 | 364 / #660 / 0.019% |
| 2009 | 366 / #670 / 0.018% |
| 2008 | 374 / #653 / 0.018% |
| 2007 | 384 / #633 / 0.019% |
| 2006 | 451 / #557 / 0.022% |
| 2005 | 420 / #563 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 391 / #578 / 0.020% |
| 2003 | 336 / #618 / 0.017% |
| 2002 | 377 / #580 / 0.019% |
| 2001 | 360 / #573 / 0.019% |
| 2000 | 435 / #516 / 0.022% |
| 1999 | 414 / #513 / 0.022% |
| 1998 | 446 / #489 / 0.023% |
| 1997 | 443 / #483 / 0.024% |
| 1996 | 445 / #484 / 0.023% |
| 1995 | 495 / #456 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 564 / #405 / 0.029% |
| 1993 | 562 / #413 / 0.029% |
| 1992 | 582 / #395 / 0.029% |
| 1991 | 695 / #349 / 0.034% |
| 1990 | 755 / #329 / 0.037% |
| 1989 | 722 / #326 / 0.036% |
| 1988 | 744 / #305 / 0.039% |
| 1987 | 770 / #283 / 0.041% |
| 1986 | 738 / #285 / 0.040% |
| 1985 | 768 / #271 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 766 / #272 / 0.042% |
| 1983 | 764 / #272 / 0.043% |
| 1982 | 867 / #254 / 0.048% |
| 1981 | 855 / #256 / 0.048% |
| 1980 | 844 / #261 / 0.047% |
| 1979 | 824 / #258 / 0.048% |
| 1978 | 793 / #257 / 0.048% |
| 1977 | 807 / #251 / 0.049% |
| 1976 | 850 / #238 / 0.054% |
| 1975 | 897 / #228 / 0.057% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 955 / #220 / 0.061% |
| 1973 | 1,046 / #207 / 0.067% |
| 1972 | 1,178 / #197 / 0.073% |
| 1971 | 1,267 / #196 / 0.072% |
| 1970 | 1,462 / #186 / 0.079% |
| 1969 | 1,522 / #182 / 0.085% |
| 1968 | 1,593 / #170 / 0.092% |
| 1967 | 1,616 / #165 / 0.093% |
| 1966 | 1,826 / #155 / 0.102% |
| 1965 | 2,092 / #147 / 0.112% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 2,277 / #143 / 0.114% |
| 1963 | 2,584 / #131 / 0.127% |
| 1962 | 2,675 / #132 / 0.129% |
| 1961 | 2,920 / #126 / 0.137% |
| 1960 | 3,080 / #121 / 0.144% |
| 1959 | 3,221 / #121 / 0.151% |
| 1958 | 3,189 / #121 / 0.150% |
| 1957 | 3,409 / #111 / 0.158% |
| 1956 | 3,230 / #113 / 0.153% |
| 1955 | 3,069 / #113 / 0.149% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 2,977 / #118 / 0.146% |
| 1953 | 2,815 / #115 / 0.143% |
| 1952 | 2,690 / #113 / 0.138% |
| 1951 | 2,678 / #114 / 0.142% |
| 1950 | 2,636 / #111 / 0.147% |
| 1949 | 2,710 / #109 / 0.153% |
| 1948 | 3,134 / #100 / 0.179% |
| 1947 | 3,378 / #97 / 0.185% |
| 1946 | 3,170 / #95 / 0.195% |
| 1945 | 2,740 / #92 / 0.204% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 2,904 / #86 / 0.213% |
| 1943 | 3,063 / #84 / 0.215% |
| 1942 | 3,066 / #84 / 0.222% |
| 1941 | 2,695 / #83 / 0.219% |
| 1940 | 2,795 / #77 / 0.241% |
| 1939 | 2,709 / #74 / 0.245% |
| 1938 | 2,881 / #72 / 0.260% |
| 1937 | 2,725 / #71 / 0.255% |
| 1936 | 2,939 / #65 / 0.283% |
| 1935 | 3,070 / #64 / 0.295% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 3,176 / #63 / 0.308% |
| 1933 | 3,033 / #62 / 0.306% |
| 1932 | 3,264 / #59 / 0.313% |
| 1931 | 3,161 / #60 / 0.304% |
| 1930 | 3,253 / #57 / 0.296% |
| 1929 | 3,174 / #57 / 0.295% |
| 1928 | 3,248 / #57 / 0.293% |
| 1927 | 3,253 / #60 / 0.289% |
| 1926 | 3,409 / #57 / 0.307% |
| 1925 | 3,219 / #64 / 0.288% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 3,369 / #60 / 0.297% |
| 1923 | 3,161 / #61 / 0.288% |
| 1922 | 3,051 / #65 / 0.280% |
| 1921 | 3,075 / #67 / 0.279% |
| 1920 | 3,086 / #67 / 0.290% |
| 1919 | 2,722 / #69 / 0.278% |
| 1918 | 2,763 / #69 / 0.273% |
| 1917 | 2,426 / #74 / 0.262% |
| 1916 | 2,334 / #73 / 0.262% |
| 1915 | 2,365 / #67 / 0.279% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,657 / #74 / 0.253% |
| 1913 | 1,328 / #73 / 0.259% |
| 1912 | 1,050 / #77 / 0.244% |
| 1911 | 602 / #71 / 0.266% |
| 1910 | 545 / #68 / 0.281% |
| 1909 | 475 / #67 / 0.290% |
| 1908 | 446 / #67 / 0.289% |
| 1907 | 475 / #60 / 0.324% |
| 1906 | 421 / #60 / 0.316% |
| 1905 | 424 / #60 / 0.320% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 432 / #55 / 0.337% |
| 1903 | 397 / #55 / 0.333% |
| 1902 | 391 / #57 / 0.319% |
| 1901 | 338 / #59 / 0.317% |
| 1900 | 457 / #55 / 0.304% |
| 1899 | 315 / #61 / 0.297% |
| 1898 | 394 / #56 / 0.321% |
| 1897 | 397 / #52 / 0.352% |
| 1896 | 426 / #50 / 0.356% |
| 1895 | 380 / #56 / 0.324% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 379 / #57 / 0.327% |
| 1893 | 378 / #56 / 0.337% |
| 1892 | 385 / #57 / 0.315% |
| 1891 | 360 / #49 / 0.356% |
| 1890 | 349 / #56 / 0.314% |
| 1889 | 355 / #54 / 0.321% |
| 1888 | 331 / #63 / 0.274% |
| 1887 | 258 / #66 / 0.254% |
| 1886 | 271 / #67 / 0.245% |
| 1885 | 237 / #74 / 0.220% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 232 / #77 / 0.203% |
| 1883 | 202 / #78 / 0.193% |
| 1882 | 195 / #83 / 0.172% |
| 1881 | 148 / #87 / 0.147% |
| 1880 | 142 / #95 / 0.129% |