Total babies named Nona (all years): 16,696
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 15 / #7476 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 17 / #6850 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 24 / #5429 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 23 / #5514 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 16 / #7136 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 28 / #4865 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 24 / #5416 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 28 / #4898 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 37 / #4061 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 25 / #5419 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 28 / #4992 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 25 / #5442 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 21 / #6281 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 22 / #6093 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 21 / #6329 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 22 / #6251 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 18 / #7323 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 22 / #6267 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 22 / #6076 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 13 / #8723 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 24 / #5336 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 12 / #8920 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 19 / #6060 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 19 / #6011 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 7 / #12783 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 13 / #7594 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 21 / #5080 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 20 / #5166 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 20 / #5011 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 17 / #5615 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 17 / #5632 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 16 / #5861 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 22 / #4646 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 21 / #4761 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 17 / #5469 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 16 / #5476 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 19 / #4608 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 22 / #3942 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 21 / #3981 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 20 / #4087 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 19 / #4115 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 36 / #2541 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 23 / #3613 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 32 / #2832 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 41 / #2379 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 36 / #2563 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 28 / #2915 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 48 / #2018 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 46 / #1958 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 44 / #2014 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 61 / #1574 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 45 / #1875 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 66 / #1465 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 73 / #1437 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 82 / #1313 / 0.005% |
| 1969 | 82 / #1239 / 0.005% |
| 1968 | 75 / #1276 / 0.005% |
| 1967 | 96 / #1065 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 74 / #1259 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 85 / #1165 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 134 / #902 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 118 / #981 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 133 / #921 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 132 / #942 / 0.007% |
| 1960 | 168 / #794 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 190 / #739 / 0.009% |
| 1958 | 181 / #737 / 0.009% |
| 1957 | 206 / #696 / 0.010% |
| 1956 | 214 / #657 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 197 / #666 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 245 / #574 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 268 / #526 / 0.014% |
| 1952 | 259 / #528 / 0.014% |
| 1951 | 314 / #471 / 0.017% |
| 1950 | 360 / #424 / 0.021% |
| 1949 | 232 / #550 / 0.014% |
| 1948 | 230 / #546 / 0.014% |
| 1947 | 223 / #573 / 0.013% |
| 1946 | 210 / #546 / 0.013% |
| 1945 | 209 / #509 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 186 / #533 / 0.014% |
| 1943 | 192 / #542 / 0.014% |
| 1942 | 237 / #479 / 0.018% |
| 1941 | 216 / #477 / 0.018% |
| 1940 | 243 / #437 / 0.021% |
| 1939 | 233 / #442 / 0.021% |
| 1938 | 269 / #410 / 0.024% |
| 1937 | 252 / #407 / 0.024% |
| 1936 | 260 / #394 / 0.025% |
| 1935 | 250 / #412 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 306 / #361 / 0.029% |
| 1933 | 278 / #387 / 0.028% |
| 1932 | 262 / #404 / 0.025% |
| 1931 | 269 / #398 / 0.025% |
| 1930 | 302 / #391 / 0.027% |
| 1929 | 248 / #424 / 0.022% |
| 1928 | 271 / #414 / 0.024% |
| 1927 | 259 / #429 / 0.022% |
| 1926 | 294 / #400 / 0.025% |
| 1925 | 257 / #430 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 271 / #428 / 0.022% |
| 1923 | 275 / #405 / 0.023% |
| 1922 | 255 / #414 / 0.021% |
| 1921 | 290 / #397 / 0.024% |
| 1920 | 251 / #421 / 0.021% |
| 1919 | 235 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1918 | 280 / #392 / 0.024% |
| 1917 | 266 / #387 / 0.025% |
| 1916 | 254 / #391 / 0.024% |
| 1915 | 242 / #388 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 188 / #388 / 0.025% |
| 1913 | 175 / #365 / 0.028% |
| 1912 | 146 / #381 / 0.026% |
| 1911 | 96 / #411 / 0.023% |
| 1910 | 135 / #339 / 0.034% |
| 1909 | 84 / #399 / 0.024% |
| 1908 | 90 / #382 / 0.027% |
| 1907 | 101 / #352 / 0.032% |
| 1906 | 85 / #366 / 0.029% |
| 1905 | 105 / #331 / 0.036% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 85 / #357 / 0.031% |
| 1903 | 77 / #366 / 0.029% |
| 1902 | 88 / #337 / 0.033% |
| 1901 | 69 / #363 / 0.029% |
| 1900 | 132 / #285 / 0.044% |
| 1899 | 104 / #288 / 0.045% |
| 1898 | 92 / #327 / 0.036% |
| 1897 | 80 / #329 / 0.034% |
| 1896 | 74 / #339 / 0.031% |
| 1895 | 71 / #340 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 70 / #334 / 0.031% |
| 1893 | 68 / #326 / 0.032% |
| 1892 | 83 / #298 / 0.039% |
| 1891 | 71 / #296 / 0.038% |
| 1890 | 72 / #293 / 0.038% |
| 1889 | 68 / #292 / 0.038% |
| 1888 | 69 / #283 / 0.039% |
| 1887 | 36 / #363 / 0.025% |
| 1886 | 45 / #315 / 0.031% |
| 1885 | 38 / #335 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 28 / #381 / 0.022% |
| 1883 | 33 / #310 / 0.029% |
| 1882 | 37 / #293 / 0.034% |
| 1881 | 38 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1880 | 31 / #280 / 0.034% |