Total babies named Nick (all years): 50,460
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 130 / #1418 / 0.008% |
| 2023 | 142 / #1337 / 0.008% |
| 2022 | 136 / #1376 / 0.008% |
| 2021 | 133 / #1382 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 121 / #1431 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 141 / #1307 / 0.008% |
| 2018 | 123 / #1429 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 147 / #1247 / 0.008% |
| 2016 | 175 / #1117 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 152 / #1214 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 157 / #1185 / 0.008% |
| 2013 | 174 / #1078 / 0.009% |
| 2012 | 157 / #1166 / 0.008% |
| 2011 | 154 / #1162 / 0.008% |
| 2010 | 176 / #1096 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 197 / #1001 / 0.010% |
| 2008 | 236 / #891 / 0.012% |
| 2007 | 227 / #887 / 0.011% |
| 2006 | 251 / #814 / 0.012% |
| 2005 | 233 / #813 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 208 / #855 / 0.010% |
| 2003 | 203 / #854 / 0.010% |
| 2002 | 201 / #830 / 0.010% |
| 2001 | 198 / #827 / 0.010% |
| 2000 | 217 / #768 / 0.011% |
| 1999 | 204 / #779 / 0.011% |
| 1998 | 179 / #828 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 147 / #927 / 0.008% |
| 1996 | 173 / #830 / 0.009% |
| 1995 | 217 / #726 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 197 / #748 / 0.010% |
| 1993 | 217 / #705 / 0.011% |
| 1992 | 226 / #688 / 0.011% |
| 1991 | 196 / #724 / 0.010% |
| 1990 | 231 / #666 / 0.011% |
| 1989 | 251 / #630 / 0.013% |
| 1988 | 241 / #608 / 0.013% |
| 1987 | 274 / #549 / 0.015% |
| 1986 | 292 / #521 / 0.016% |
| 1985 | 255 / #551 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 278 / #510 / 0.015% |
| 1983 | 259 / #520 / 0.014% |
| 1982 | 267 / #522 / 0.015% |
| 1981 | 293 / #489 / 0.016% |
| 1980 | 318 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1979 | 373 / #411 / 0.022% |
| 1978 | 401 / #389 / 0.024% |
| 1977 | 426 / #379 / 0.026% |
| 1976 | 405 / #382 / 0.026% |
| 1975 | 447 / #370 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 504 / #344 / 0.032% |
| 1973 | 550 / #320 / 0.035% |
| 1972 | 553 / #325 / 0.034% |
| 1971 | 565 / #330 / 0.032% |
| 1970 | 666 / #304 / 0.036% |
| 1969 | 655 / #298 / 0.037% |
| 1968 | 665 / #285 / 0.038% |
| 1967 | 682 / #276 / 0.039% |
| 1966 | 685 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1965 | 717 / #281 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 798 / #273 / 0.040% |
| 1963 | 871 / #261 / 0.043% |
| 1962 | 896 / #257 / 0.043% |
| 1961 | 935 / #256 / 0.044% |
| 1960 | 1,099 / #242 / 0.052% |
| 1959 | 1,054 / #247 / 0.049% |
| 1958 | 848 / #266 / 0.040% |
| 1957 | 690 / #282 / 0.032% |
| 1956 | 493 / #336 / 0.023% |
| 1955 | 471 / #338 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 431 / #342 / 0.021% |
| 1953 | 418 / #340 / 0.021% |
| 1952 | 420 / #340 / 0.022% |
| 1951 | 448 / #323 / 0.024% |
| 1950 | 422 / #329 / 0.024% |
| 1949 | 446 / #326 / 0.025% |
| 1948 | 547 / #294 / 0.031% |
| 1947 | 646 / #264 / 0.035% |
| 1946 | 565 / #268 / 0.035% |
| 1945 | 491 / #266 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 498 / #267 / 0.037% |
| 1943 | 558 / #252 / 0.039% |
| 1942 | 520 / #258 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 440 / #273 / 0.036% |
| 1940 | 409 / #277 / 0.035% |
| 1939 | 405 / #272 / 0.037% |
| 1938 | 400 / #278 / 0.036% |
| 1937 | 395 / #275 / 0.037% |
| 1936 | 421 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1935 | 456 / #255 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 465 / #248 / 0.045% |
| 1933 | 499 / #231 / 0.050% |
| 1932 | 490 / #241 / 0.047% |
| 1931 | 512 / #231 / 0.049% |
| 1930 | 630 / #210 / 0.057% |
| 1929 | 588 / #216 / 0.055% |
| 1928 | 604 / #217 / 0.055% |
| 1927 | 616 / #216 / 0.055% |
| 1926 | 642 / #213 / 0.058% |
| 1925 | 691 / #203 / 0.062% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 747 / #189 / 0.066% |
| 1923 | 690 / #198 / 0.063% |
| 1922 | 790 / #178 / 0.073% |
| 1921 | 765 / #183 / 0.069% |
| 1920 | 699 / #194 / 0.066% |
| 1919 | 682 / #188 / 0.070% |
| 1918 | 761 / #173 / 0.075% |
| 1917 | 705 / #177 / 0.076% |
| 1916 | 656 / #182 / 0.074% |
| 1915 | 642 / #177 / 0.076% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 425 / #196 / 0.065% |
| 1913 | 310 / #211 / 0.060% |
| 1912 | 248 / #219 / 0.058% |
| 1911 | 130 / #220 / 0.058% |
| 1910 | 124 / #209 / 0.064% |
| 1909 | 79 / #251 / 0.048% |
| 1908 | 84 / #228 / 0.054% |
| 1907 | 77 / #232 / 0.052% |
| 1906 | 67 / #239 / 0.050% |
| 1905 | 52 / #275 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 57 / #255 / 0.044% |
| 1903 | 46 / #275 / 0.039% |
| 1902 | 37 / #324 / 0.030% |
| 1901 | 40 / #274 / 0.038% |
| 1900 | 49 / #300 / 0.033% |
| 1899 | 28 / #342 / 0.026% |
| 1898 | 37 / #319 / 0.030% |
| 1897 | 39 / #296 / 0.035% |
| 1896 | 31 / #350 / 0.026% |
| 1895 | 29 / #344 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 38 / #287 / 0.033% |
| 1893 | 22 / #389 / 0.020% |
| 1892 | 37 / #308 / 0.030% |
| 1891 | 40 / #255 / 0.040% |
| 1890 | 45 / #253 / 0.041% |
| 1889 | 34 / #292 / 0.031% |
| 1888 | 48 / #255 / 0.040% |
| 1887 | 29 / #309 / 0.029% |
| 1886 | 47 / #251 / 0.042% |
| 1885 | 38 / #272 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 48 / #250 / 0.042% |
| 1883 | 36 / #277 / 0.034% |
| 1882 | 35 / #293 / 0.031% |
| 1881 | 39 / #255 / 0.039% |
| 1880 | 40 / #269 / 0.036% |