Total babies named Neal (all years): 55,217
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 77 / #2002 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 95 / #1740 / 0.006% |
| 2022 | 110 / #1603 / 0.006% |
| 2021 | 110 / #1582 / 0.006% |
| 2020 | 104 / #1571 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 118 / #1470 / 0.007% |
| 2018 | 102 / #1614 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 131 / #1363 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 152 / #1231 / 0.008% |
| 2015 | 152 / #1213 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 120 / #1409 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 99 / #1575 / 0.005% |
| 2012 | 105 / #1530 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 97 / #1595 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 114 / #1452 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 113 / #1480 / 0.006% |
| 2008 | 112 / #1474 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 116 / #1409 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 138 / #1222 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 131 / #1214 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 111 / #1332 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 129 / #1166 / 0.007% |
| 2002 | 169 / #952 / 0.009% |
| 2001 | 172 / #911 / 0.009% |
| 2000 | 178 / #888 / 0.009% |
| 1999 | 186 / #825 / 0.010% |
| 1998 | 210 / #762 / 0.011% |
| 1997 | 246 / #665 / 0.013% |
| 1996 | 262 / #641 / 0.014% |
| 1995 | 258 / #650 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 294 / #612 / 0.015% |
| 1993 | 384 / #520 / 0.020% |
| 1992 | 396 / #508 / 0.020% |
| 1991 | 444 / #470 / 0.022% |
| 1990 | 463 / #460 / 0.023% |
| 1989 | 522 / #409 / 0.026% |
| 1988 | 460 / #423 / 0.024% |
| 1987 | 456 / #408 / 0.024% |
| 1986 | 543 / #348 / 0.029% |
| 1985 | 562 / #340 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 566 / #332 / 0.031% |
| 1983 | 573 / #329 / 0.032% |
| 1982 | 556 / #338 / 0.031% |
| 1981 | 596 / #320 / 0.033% |
| 1980 | 592 / #323 / 0.033% |
| 1979 | 636 / #306 / 0.037% |
| 1978 | 583 / #307 / 0.036% |
| 1977 | 622 / #309 / 0.038% |
| 1976 | 550 / #323 / 0.035% |
| 1975 | 648 / #293 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 582 / #314 / 0.037% |
| 1973 | 537 / #323 / 0.034% |
| 1972 | 534 / #333 / 0.033% |
| 1971 | 600 / #315 / 0.034% |
| 1970 | 719 / #289 / 0.039% |
| 1969 | 703 / #281 / 0.039% |
| 1968 | 651 / #290 / 0.037% |
| 1967 | 741 / #268 / 0.042% |
| 1966 | 815 / #254 / 0.046% |
| 1965 | 883 / #250 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,128 / #223 / 0.057% |
| 1963 | 1,094 / #227 / 0.054% |
| 1962 | 1,031 / #241 / 0.050% |
| 1961 | 1,122 / #237 / 0.053% |
| 1960 | 1,192 / #233 / 0.056% |
| 1959 | 1,223 / #222 / 0.057% |
| 1958 | 1,156 / #227 / 0.054% |
| 1957 | 1,192 / #218 / 0.055% |
| 1956 | 1,102 / #220 / 0.052% |
| 1955 | 1,060 / #220 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,088 / #212 / 0.053% |
| 1953 | 967 / #216 / 0.049% |
| 1952 | 1,142 / #198 / 0.059% |
| 1951 | 955 / #209 / 0.051% |
| 1950 | 848 / #217 / 0.047% |
| 1949 | 740 / #239 / 0.042% |
| 1948 | 713 / #242 / 0.041% |
| 1947 | 730 / #243 / 0.040% |
| 1946 | 676 / #232 / 0.042% |
| 1945 | 578 / #233 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 568 / #236 / 0.042% |
| 1943 | 535 / #263 / 0.037% |
| 1942 | 569 / #237 / 0.041% |
| 1941 | 543 / #233 / 0.044% |
| 1940 | 506 / #239 / 0.044% |
| 1939 | 444 / #256 / 0.040% |
| 1938 | 446 / #258 / 0.040% |
| 1937 | 430 / #261 / 0.040% |
| 1936 | 419 / #265 / 0.040% |
| 1935 | 415 / #265 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 440 / #257 / 0.043% |
| 1933 | 362 / #277 / 0.037% |
| 1932 | 374 / #283 / 0.036% |
| 1931 | 372 / #286 / 0.036% |
| 1930 | 381 / #292 / 0.035% |
| 1929 | 342 / #301 / 0.032% |
| 1928 | 377 / #291 / 0.034% |
| 1927 | 384 / #291 / 0.034% |
| 1926 | 417 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1925 | 420 / #282 / 0.038% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 405 / #284 / 0.036% |
| 1923 | 410 / #279 / 0.037% |
| 1922 | 388 / #282 / 0.036% |
| 1921 | 344 / #314 / 0.031% |
| 1920 | 371 / #293 / 0.035% |
| 1919 | 294 / #329 / 0.030% |
| 1918 | 287 / #337 / 0.028% |
| 1917 | 277 / #327 / 0.030% |
| 1916 | 283 / #308 / 0.032% |
| 1915 | 228 / #355 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 176 / #352 / 0.027% |
| 1913 | 143 / #346 / 0.028% |
| 1912 | 127 / #337 / 0.030% |
| 1911 | 63 / #347 / 0.028% |
| 1910 | 65 / #307 / 0.033% |
| 1909 | 48 / #338 / 0.029% |
| 1908 | 46 / #334 / 0.030% |
| 1907 | 48 / #308 / 0.033% |
| 1906 | 43 / #319 / 0.032% |
| 1905 | 45 / #302 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 44 / #291 / 0.034% |
| 1903 | 49 / #264 / 0.041% |
| 1902 | 46 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1901 | 29 / #343 / 0.027% |
| 1900 | 58 / #270 / 0.039% |
| 1899 | 33 / #310 / 0.031% |
| 1898 | 40 / #295 / 0.033% |
| 1897 | 43 / #277 / 0.038% |
| 1896 | 35 / #321 / 0.029% |
| 1895 | 38 / #292 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 41 / #277 / 0.035% |
| 1893 | 33 / #305 / 0.029% |
| 1892 | 35 / #315 / 0.029% |
| 1891 | 35 / #275 / 0.035% |
| 1890 | 40 / #273 / 0.036% |
| 1889 | 38 / #273 / 0.034% |
| 1888 | 37 / #294 / 0.031% |
| 1887 | 37 / #269 / 0.036% |
| 1886 | 40 / #270 / 0.036% |
| 1885 | 33 / #294 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 36 / #294 / 0.031% |
| 1883 | 29 / #308 / 0.028% |
| 1882 | 35 / #292 / 0.031% |
| 1881 | 33 / #275 / 0.033% |
| 1880 | 43 / #257 / 0.039% |