Total babies named Nathaniel (all years): 285,643
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,511 / #144 / 0.146% |
| 2023 | 2,526 / #143 / 0.148% |
| 2022 | 2,700 / #138 / 0.155% |
| 2021 | 2,825 / #133 / 0.162% |
| 2020 | 2,926 / #125 / 0.170% |
| 2019 | 3,094 / #122 / 0.173% |
| 2018 | 3,389 / #116 / 0.187% |
| 2017 | 3,540 / #112 / 0.191% |
| 2016 | 3,884 / #103 / 0.205% |
| 2015 | 4,233 / #97 / 0.221% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 4,317 / #94 / 0.225% |
| 2013 | 4,537 / #91 / 0.240% |
| 2012 | 4,794 / #84 / 0.253% |
| 2011 | 4,978 / #84 / 0.262% |
| 2010 | 5,109 / #81 / 0.266% |
| 2009 | 5,426 / #75 / 0.274% |
| 2008 | 5,856 / #77 / 0.287% |
| 2007 | 6,066 / #82 / 0.292% |
| 2006 | 6,626 / #69 / 0.322% |
| 2005 | 6,689 / #67 / 0.335% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 6,675 / #68 / 0.336% |
| 2003 | 6,666 / #63 / 0.337% |
| 2002 | 6,813 / #62 / 0.351% |
| 2001 | 6,645 / #61 / 0.342% |
| 2000 | 6,797 / #61 / 0.346% |
| 1999 | 6,466 / #62 / 0.337% |
| 1998 | 6,427 / #60 / 0.336% |
| 1997 | 5,775 / #65 / 0.306% |
| 1996 | 5,420 / #69 / 0.286% |
| 1995 | 5,203 / #73 / 0.273% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 5,029 / #78 / 0.260% |
| 1993 | 4,854 / #75 / 0.247% |
| 1992 | 4,687 / #79 / 0.235% |
| 1991 | 4,367 / #84 / 0.216% |
| 1990 | 4,348 / #86 / 0.212% |
| 1989 | 4,120 / #84 / 0.206% |
| 1988 | 4,054 / #82 / 0.212% |
| 1987 | 4,050 / #78 / 0.217% |
| 1986 | 4,031 / #78 / 0.219% |
| 1985 | 4,003 / #77 / 0.217% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 3,602 / #80 / 0.200% |
| 1983 | 3,641 / #79 / 0.203% |
| 1982 | 3,938 / #75 / 0.217% |
| 1981 | 3,719 / #80 / 0.208% |
| 1980 | 3,492 / #86 / 0.196% |
| 1979 | 3,040 / #95 / 0.177% |
| 1978 | 2,925 / #94 / 0.178% |
| 1977 | 2,499 / #107 / 0.152% |
| 1976 | 2,210 / #114 / 0.141% |
| 1975 | 1,957 / #131 / 0.125% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,609 / #153 / 0.102% |
| 1973 | 1,391 / #169 / 0.089% |
| 1972 | 1,208 / #192 / 0.074% |
| 1971 | 1,210 / #200 / 0.068% |
| 1970 | 1,136 / #218 / 0.061% |
| 1969 | 991 / #231 / 0.055% |
| 1968 | 922 / #235 / 0.053% |
| 1967 | 978 / #226 / 0.056% |
| 1966 | 903 / #235 / 0.051% |
| 1965 | 1,071 / #223 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,023 / #237 / 0.051% |
| 1963 | 1,025 / #233 / 0.050% |
| 1962 | 1,085 / #234 / 0.052% |
| 1961 | 1,049 / #244 / 0.049% |
| 1960 | 1,145 / #239 / 0.054% |
| 1959 | 1,158 / #235 / 0.054% |
| 1958 | 1,104 / #235 / 0.052% |
| 1957 | 1,261 / #213 / 0.058% |
| 1956 | 1,311 / #205 / 0.062% |
| 1955 | 1,330 / #196 / 0.065% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,229 / #203 / 0.060% |
| 1953 | 1,268 / #193 / 0.064% |
| 1952 | 1,258 / #189 / 0.065% |
| 1951 | 1,247 / #187 / 0.066% |
| 1950 | 1,222 / #182 / 0.068% |
| 1949 | 1,193 / #179 / 0.067% |
| 1948 | 1,159 / #180 / 0.066% |
| 1947 | 1,100 / #187 / 0.060% |
| 1946 | 977 / #187 / 0.060% |
| 1945 | 853 / #181 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 864 / #184 / 0.063% |
| 1943 | 839 / #191 / 0.059% |
| 1942 | 843 / #188 / 0.061% |
| 1941 | 829 / #182 / 0.067% |
| 1940 | 833 / #176 / 0.072% |
| 1939 | 770 / #183 / 0.070% |
| 1938 | 749 / #186 / 0.068% |
| 1937 | 703 / #187 / 0.066% |
| 1936 | 738 / #179 / 0.071% |
| 1935 | 747 / #180 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 782 / #174 / 0.076% |
| 1933 | 728 / #178 / 0.073% |
| 1932 | 781 / #176 / 0.075% |
| 1931 | 659 / #199 / 0.063% |
| 1930 | 754 / #185 / 0.069% |
| 1929 | 760 / #184 / 0.071% |
| 1928 | 728 / #194 / 0.066% |
| 1927 | 769 / #187 / 0.068% |
| 1926 | 821 / #176 / 0.074% |
| 1925 | 810 / #178 / 0.073% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 800 / #180 / 0.071% |
| 1923 | 721 / #193 / 0.066% |
| 1922 | 800 / #175 / 0.074% |
| 1921 | 748 / #187 / 0.068% |
| 1920 | 837 / #166 / 0.079% |
| 1919 | 748 / #175 / 0.076% |
| 1918 | 661 / #193 / 0.065% |
| 1917 | 640 / #189 / 0.069% |
| 1916 | 590 / #194 / 0.066% |
| 1915 | 554 / #197 / 0.065% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 470 / #185 / 0.072% |
| 1913 | 337 / #201 / 0.066% |
| 1912 | 356 / #164 / 0.083% |
| 1911 | 207 / #161 / 0.092% |
| 1910 | 232 / #139 / 0.119% |
| 1909 | 143 / #172 / 0.087% |
| 1908 | 150 / #160 / 0.097% |
| 1907 | 124 / #175 / 0.084% |
| 1906 | 101 / #179 / 0.076% |
| 1905 | 117 / #168 / 0.088% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 105 / #174 / 0.082% |
| 1903 | 105 / #165 / 0.088% |
| 1902 | 88 / #189 / 0.072% |
| 1901 | 92 / #165 / 0.086% |
| 1900 | 118 / #179 / 0.078% |
| 1899 | 72 / #190 / 0.068% |
| 1898 | 90 / #176 / 0.073% |
| 1897 | 43 / #276 / 0.038% |
| 1896 | 73 / #207 / 0.061% |
| 1895 | 72 / #201 / 0.061% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 77 / #192 / 0.067% |
| 1893 | 58 / #224 / 0.052% |
| 1892 | 78 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1891 | 46 / #238 / 0.045% |
| 1890 | 75 / #178 / 0.068% |
| 1889 | 48 / #236 / 0.043% |
| 1888 | 63 / #222 / 0.052% |
| 1887 | 57 / #204 / 0.056% |
| 1886 | 59 / #221 / 0.053% |
| 1885 | 54 / #224 / 0.050% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 56 / #225 / 0.049% |
| 1883 | 49 / #224 / 0.047% |
| 1882 | 57 / #219 / 0.050% |
| 1881 | 48 / #221 / 0.048% |
| 1880 | 60 / #205 / 0.054% |