Total babies named Nathan (all years): 584,253
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 5,010 / #62 / 0.292% |
| 2023 | 5,066 / #59 / 0.297% |
| 2022 | 5,539 / #57 / 0.318% |
| 2021 | 5,431 / #59 / 0.311% |
| 2020 | 5,700 / #55 / 0.330% |
| 2019 | 6,087 / #55 / 0.339% |
| 2018 | 6,850 / #48 / 0.377% |
| 2017 | 7,441 / #45 / 0.402% |
| 2016 | 8,000 / #43 / 0.422% |
| 2015 | 8,599 / #38 / 0.449% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 8,995 / #38 / 0.468% |
| 2013 | 9,721 / #31 / 0.514% |
| 2012 | 10,431 / #29 / 0.550% |
| 2011 | 10,522 / #28 / 0.554% |
| 2010 | 11,378 / #27 / 0.593% |
| 2009 | 12,135 / #25 / 0.612% |
| 2008 | 13,262 / #21 / 0.650% |
| 2007 | 13,604 / #24 / 0.656% |
| 2006 | 14,278 / #23 / 0.695% |
| 2005 | 14,364 / #20 / 0.719% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 14,633 / #20 / 0.737% |
| 2003 | 13,667 / #26 / 0.692% |
| 2002 | 13,225 / #28 / 0.681% |
| 2001 | 12,647 / #31 / 0.651% |
| 2000 | 13,039 / #30 / 0.664% |
| 1999 | 12,537 / #32 / 0.653% |
| 1998 | 11,586 / #34 / 0.606% |
| 1997 | 10,443 / #34 / 0.554% |
| 1996 | 10,285 / #37 / 0.543% |
| 1995 | 10,306 / #39 / 0.541% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 10,381 / #40 / 0.537% |
| 1993 | 10,197 / #41 / 0.520% |
| 1992 | 10,150 / #44 / 0.508% |
| 1991 | 10,498 / #42 / 0.520% |
| 1990 | 10,936 / #44 / 0.532% |
| 1989 | 10,907 / #43 / 0.545% |
| 1988 | 10,154 / #44 / 0.530% |
| 1987 | 9,910 / #45 / 0.531% |
| 1986 | 9,996 / #43 / 0.543% |
| 1985 | 10,652 / #40 / 0.576% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 10,613 / #38 / 0.588% |
| 1983 | 10,558 / #40 / 0.589% |
| 1982 | 10,806 / #36 / 0.596% |
| 1981 | 11,258 / #36 / 0.628% |
| 1980 | 11,140 / #36 / 0.624% |
| 1979 | 10,721 / #37 / 0.623% |
| 1978 | 9,892 / #36 / 0.602% |
| 1977 | 9,888 / #36 / 0.602% |
| 1976 | 8,609 / #39 / 0.549% |
| 1975 | 7,069 / #45 / 0.453% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 5,846 / #52 / 0.372% |
| 1973 | 4,735 / #63 / 0.304% |
| 1972 | 3,514 / #79 / 0.217% |
| 1971 | 3,048 / #104 / 0.172% |
| 1970 | 2,546 / #130 / 0.137% |
| 1969 | 1,908 / #154 / 0.107% |
| 1968 | 1,655 / #163 / 0.095% |
| 1967 | 1,432 / #180 / 0.082% |
| 1966 | 1,423 / #179 / 0.080% |
| 1965 | 1,418 / #182 / 0.076% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,499 / #189 / 0.075% |
| 1963 | 1,541 / #194 / 0.076% |
| 1962 | 1,532 / #198 / 0.074% |
| 1961 | 1,491 / #199 / 0.070% |
| 1960 | 1,628 / #190 / 0.076% |
| 1959 | 1,378 / #207 / 0.065% |
| 1958 | 1,237 / #214 / 0.058% |
| 1957 | 1,225 / #215 / 0.057% |
| 1956 | 1,099 / #223 / 0.052% |
| 1955 | 950 / #232 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 959 / #225 / 0.047% |
| 1953 | 806 / #237 / 0.041% |
| 1952 | 851 / #229 / 0.044% |
| 1951 | 870 / #222 / 0.046% |
| 1950 | 752 / #243 / 0.042% |
| 1949 | 660 / #251 / 0.037% |
| 1948 | 620 / #263 / 0.035% |
| 1947 | 617 / #273 / 0.034% |
| 1946 | 557 / #271 / 0.034% |
| 1945 | 488 / #267 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 507 / #262 / 0.037% |
| 1943 | 581 / #244 / 0.041% |
| 1942 | 523 / #253 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 527 / #243 / 0.043% |
| 1940 | 497 / #243 / 0.043% |
| 1939 | 467 / #247 / 0.042% |
| 1938 | 516 / #232 / 0.047% |
| 1937 | 434 / #258 / 0.041% |
| 1936 | 464 / #243 / 0.045% |
| 1935 | 468 / #248 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 469 / #245 / 0.045% |
| 1933 | 413 / #259 / 0.042% |
| 1932 | 486 / #243 / 0.047% |
| 1931 | 442 / #258 / 0.043% |
| 1930 | 540 / #234 / 0.049% |
| 1929 | 513 / #239 / 0.048% |
| 1928 | 548 / #235 / 0.049% |
| 1927 | 636 / #210 / 0.056% |
| 1926 | 669 / #206 / 0.060% |
| 1925 | 615 / #219 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 680 / #204 / 0.060% |
| 1923 | 739 / #187 / 0.067% |
| 1922 | 749 / #185 / 0.069% |
| 1921 | 751 / #186 / 0.068% |
| 1920 | 815 / #172 / 0.077% |
| 1919 | 849 / #156 / 0.087% |
| 1918 | 945 / #150 / 0.093% |
| 1917 | 881 / #148 / 0.095% |
| 1916 | 904 / #143 / 0.102% |
| 1915 | 916 / #139 / 0.108% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 848 / #124 / 0.130% |
| 1913 | 615 / #127 / 0.120% |
| 1912 | 581 / #120 / 0.135% |
| 1911 | 348 / #109 / 0.154% |
| 1910 | 245 / #135 / 0.126% |
| 1909 | 209 / #130 / 0.127% |
| 1908 | 178 / #137 / 0.115% |
| 1907 | 176 / #136 / 0.120% |
| 1906 | 148 / #139 / 0.111% |
| 1905 | 168 / #131 / 0.127% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 131 / #148 / 0.102% |
| 1903 | 146 / #128 / 0.122% |
| 1902 | 143 / #136 / 0.117% |
| 1901 | 131 / #128 / 0.123% |
| 1900 | 186 / #126 / 0.124% |
| 1899 | 112 / #141 / 0.105% |
| 1898 | 99 / #167 / 0.081% |
| 1897 | 139 / #119 / 0.123% |
| 1896 | 110 / #152 / 0.092% |
| 1895 | 119 / #136 / 0.101% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 127 / #126 / 0.110% |
| 1893 | 114 / #132 / 0.102% |
| 1892 | 144 / #118 / 0.118% |
| 1891 | 106 / #131 / 0.105% |
| 1890 | 110 / #130 / 0.099% |
| 1889 | 121 / #117 / 0.109% |
| 1888 | 129 / #124 / 0.107% |
| 1887 | 106 / #125 / 0.105% |
| 1886 | 136 / #115 / 0.123% |
| 1885 | 103 / #132 / 0.096% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 100 / #141 / 0.087% |
| 1883 | 93 / #132 / 0.089% |
| 1882 | 113 / #124 / 0.099% |
| 1881 | 91 / #136 / 0.090% |
| 1880 | 114 / #115 / 0.103% |