Total babies named Nat (all years): 2,162
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 / #13553 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 5 / #11910 / 0.000% |
| 1996 | 6 / #8669 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 5 / #9390 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 6 / #7942 / 0.000% |
| 1987 | 5 / #7775 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 8 / #4845 / 0.000% |
| 1982 | 9 / #4475 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 6 / #6012 / 0.000% |
| 1980 | 6 / #6012 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1979 | 10 / #3987 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 7 / #4770 / 0.000% |
| 1974 | 13 / #2897 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 19 / #2188 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 8 / #3851 / 0.000% |
| 1971 | 20 / #2098 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 17 / #2263 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 14 / #2381 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 15 / #2166 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 9 / #2916 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1966 | 15 / #2110 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 17 / #1974 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 26 / #1561 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 21 / #1775 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 13 / #2335 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 23 / #1723 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 30 / #1475 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 34 / #1355 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 24 / #1627 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 28 / #1505 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1956 | 17 / #1999 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 22 / #1669 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 16 / #2021 / 0.001% |
| 1953 | 24 / #1573 / 0.001% |
| 1952 | 18 / #1845 / 0.001% |
| 1951 | 15 / #2023 / 0.001% |
| 1950 | 18 / #1788 / 0.001% |
| 1949 | 20 / #1694 / 0.001% |
| 1948 | 22 / #1594 / 0.001% |
| 1947 | 28 / #1411 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1946 | 20 / #1630 / 0.001% |
| 1945 | 17 / #1679 / 0.001% |
| 1944 | 23 / #1424 / 0.002% |
| 1943 | 21 / #1563 / 0.001% |
| 1942 | 24 / #1450 / 0.002% |
| 1941 | 24 / #1400 / 0.002% |
| 1940 | 21 / #1508 / 0.002% |
| 1939 | 22 / #1446 / 0.002% |
| 1938 | 22 / #1463 / 0.002% |
| 1937 | 25 / #1363 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1936 | 20 / #1529 / 0.002% |
| 1935 | 21 / #1524 / 0.002% |
| 1934 | 25 / #1377 / 0.002% |
| 1933 | 21 / #1527 / 0.002% |
| 1932 | 28 / #1317 / 0.003% |
| 1931 | 26 / #1380 / 0.003% |
| 1930 | 31 / #1295 / 0.003% |
| 1929 | 34 / #1209 / 0.003% |
| 1928 | 22 / #1634 / 0.002% |
| 1927 | 36 / #1220 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1926 | 32 / #1290 / 0.003% |
| 1925 | 29 / #1384 / 0.003% |
| 1924 | 38 / #1181 / 0.003% |
| 1923 | 35 / #1231 / 0.003% |
| 1922 | 44 / #1069 / 0.004% |
| 1921 | 40 / #1135 / 0.004% |
| 1920 | 43 / #1083 / 0.004% |
| 1919 | 52 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1918 | 48 / #972 / 0.005% |
| 1917 | 56 / #859 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1916 | 51 / #886 / 0.006% |
| 1915 | 61 / #769 / 0.007% |
| 1914 | 42 / #833 / 0.006% |
| 1913 | 36 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1912 | 49 / #578 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 29 / #568 / 0.013% |
| 1910 | 20 / #669 / 0.010% |
| 1909 | 16 / #702 / 0.010% |
| 1908 | 16 / #674 / 0.010% |
| 1907 | 12 / #801 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1906 | 12 / #740 / 0.009% |
| 1905 | 6 / #1193 / 0.005% |
| 1904 | 5 / #1345 / 0.004% |
| 1903 | 14 / #609 / 0.012% |
| 1902 | 7 / #997 / 0.006% |
| 1901 | 11 / #667 / 0.010% |
| 1900 | 18 / #595 / 0.012% |
| 1899 | 16 / #495 / 0.015% |
| 1898 | 15 / #561 / 0.012% |
| 1897 | 8 / #836 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | 6 / #1066 / 0.005% |
| 1895 | 11 / #663 / 0.009% |
| 1894 | 18 / #475 / 0.016% |
| 1893 | 9 / #743 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 16 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1891 | 12 / #552 / 0.012% |
| 1890 | 14 / #527 / 0.013% |
| 1889 | 8 / #767 / 0.007% |
| 1888 | 12 / #598 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 8 / #725 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1886 | 9 / #678 / 0.008% |
| 1885 | 15 / #494 / 0.014% |
| 1884 | 8 / #739 / 0.007% |
| 1883 | 13 / #511 / 0.012% |
| 1882 | 7 / #811 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 14 / #478 / 0.014% |
| 1880 | 14 / #495 / 0.013% |