Total babies named Miguel (all years): 189,879
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,924 / #189 / 0.112% |
| 2023 | 1,891 / #194 / 0.111% |
| 2022 | 2,040 / #185 / 0.117% |
| 2021 | 1,950 / #196 / 0.112% |
| 2020 | 2,053 / #189 / 0.119% |
| 2019 | 2,184 / #178 / 0.122% |
| 2018 | 2,185 / #179 / 0.120% |
| 2017 | 2,279 / #176 / 0.123% |
| 2016 | 2,506 / #163 / 0.132% |
| 2015 | 2,573 / #161 / 0.134% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,757 / #147 / 0.144% |
| 2013 | 2,888 / #135 / 0.153% |
| 2012 | 2,942 / #131 / 0.155% |
| 2011 | 3,169 / #126 / 0.167% |
| 2010 | 3,456 / #113 / 0.180% |
| 2009 | 4,173 / #100 / 0.210% |
| 2008 | 4,450 / #101 / 0.218% |
| 2007 | 4,906 / #94 / 0.236% |
| 2006 | 4,903 / #89 / 0.239% |
| 2005 | 4,676 / #93 / 0.234% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 4,525 / #96 / 0.228% |
| 2003 | 4,591 / #95 / 0.232% |
| 2002 | 4,644 / #89 / 0.239% |
| 2001 | 4,558 / #87 / 0.235% |
| 2000 | 4,673 / #86 / 0.238% |
| 1999 | 4,207 / #91 / 0.219% |
| 1998 | 4,256 / #90 / 0.223% |
| 1997 | 4,234 / #91 / 0.225% |
| 1996 | 4,160 / #91 / 0.220% |
| 1995 | 3,953 / #94 / 0.208% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 4,033 / #94 / 0.209% |
| 1993 | 4,348 / #88 / 0.222% |
| 1992 | 4,174 / #90 / 0.209% |
| 1991 | 3,947 / #92 / 0.195% |
| 1990 | 3,698 / #101 / 0.180% |
| 1989 | 3,081 / #108 / 0.154% |
| 1988 | 2,734 / #111 / 0.143% |
| 1987 | 2,637 / #110 / 0.141% |
| 1986 | 2,579 / #111 / 0.140% |
| 1985 | 2,525 / #113 / 0.137% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 2,418 / #113 / 0.134% |
| 1983 | 2,378 / #114 / 0.133% |
| 1982 | 2,632 / #110 / 0.145% |
| 1981 | 2,400 / #116 / 0.134% |
| 1980 | 2,176 / #128 / 0.122% |
| 1979 | 1,960 / #137 / 0.114% |
| 1978 | 1,827 / #145 / 0.111% |
| 1977 | 1,756 / #145 / 0.107% |
| 1976 | 1,758 / #143 / 0.112% |
| 1975 | 1,657 / #148 / 0.106% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,658 / #147 / 0.105% |
| 1973 | 1,461 / #163 / 0.094% |
| 1972 | 1,421 / #175 / 0.088% |
| 1971 | 1,472 / #180 / 0.083% |
| 1970 | 1,345 / #197 / 0.072% |
| 1969 | 1,304 / #198 / 0.073% |
| 1968 | 1,107 / #212 / 0.064% |
| 1967 | 1,056 / #216 / 0.061% |
| 1966 | 1,017 / #220 / 0.057% |
| 1965 | 950 / #238 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 952 / #249 / 0.048% |
| 1963 | 879 / #260 / 0.043% |
| 1962 | 872 / #259 / 0.042% |
| 1961 | 825 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1960 | 819 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1959 | 799 / #281 / 0.037% |
| 1958 | 771 / #275 / 0.036% |
| 1957 | 741 / #278 / 0.034% |
| 1956 | 669 / #284 / 0.032% |
| 1955 | 613 / #289 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 610 / #285 / 0.030% |
| 1953 | 545 / #305 / 0.028% |
| 1952 | 511 / #315 / 0.026% |
| 1951 | 464 / #322 / 0.025% |
| 1950 | 443 / #324 / 0.025% |
| 1949 | 368 / #353 / 0.021% |
| 1948 | 383 / #343 / 0.022% |
| 1947 | 292 / #403 / 0.016% |
| 1946 | 262 / #398 / 0.016% |
| 1945 | 226 / #399 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 216 / #409 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 214 / #424 / 0.015% |
| 1942 | 183 / #456 / 0.013% |
| 1941 | 166 / #460 / 0.014% |
| 1940 | 170 / #446 / 0.015% |
| 1939 | 161 / #455 / 0.015% |
| 1938 | 139 / #493 / 0.013% |
| 1937 | 143 / #474 / 0.013% |
| 1936 | 155 / #453 / 0.015% |
| 1935 | 145 / #472 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 153 / #455 / 0.015% |
| 1933 | 179 / #404 / 0.018% |
| 1932 | 171 / #427 / 0.016% |
| 1931 | 189 / #409 / 0.018% |
| 1930 | 221 / #383 / 0.020% |
| 1929 | 245 / #363 / 0.023% |
| 1928 | 226 / #397 / 0.020% |
| 1927 | 201 / #428 / 0.018% |
| 1926 | 195 / #434 / 0.018% |
| 1925 | 191 / #432 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 191 / #443 / 0.017% |
| 1923 | 175 / #464 / 0.016% |
| 1922 | 161 / #485 / 0.015% |
| 1921 | 128 / #557 / 0.012% |
| 1920 | 127 / #547 / 0.012% |
| 1919 | 137 / #510 / 0.014% |
| 1918 | 102 / #610 / 0.010% |
| 1917 | 107 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1916 | 89 / #619 / 0.010% |
| 1915 | 104 / #554 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 68 / #613 / 0.010% |
| 1913 | 61 / #557 / 0.012% |
| 1912 | 47 / #597 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 36 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 32 / #497 / 0.016% |
| 1909 | 18 / #647 / 0.011% |
| 1908 | 24 / #519 / 0.016% |
| 1907 | 19 / #580 / 0.013% |
| 1906 | 19 / #536 / 0.014% |
| 1905 | 25 / #444 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 18 / #529 / 0.014% |
| 1903 | 18 / #515 / 0.015% |
| 1902 | 21 / #469 / 0.017% |
| 1901 | 13 / #579 / 0.012% |
| 1900 | 17 / #617 / 0.011% |
| 1899 | 14 / #539 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 13 / #623 / 0.011% |
| 1897 | 14 / #573 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 7 / #948 / 0.006% |
| 1895 | 16 / #519 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 13 / #586 / 0.011% |
| 1893 | 12 / #598 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 16 / #509 / 0.013% |
| 1891 | 7 / #817 / 0.007% |
| 1890 | 9 / #717 / 0.008% |
| 1889 | 8 / #765 / 0.007% |
| 1886 | 13 / #531 / 0.012% |
| 1885 | 10 / #627 / 0.009% |
| 1884 | 9 / #687 / 0.008% |
| 1883 | 12 / #548 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 10 / #631 / 0.009% |
| 1881 | 9 / #632 / 0.009% |
| 1880 | 12 / #551 / 0.011% |