Total babies named Margret (all years): 10,047
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 16 / #7098 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 8 / #11803 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 9 / #10907 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 10 / #10038 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 13 / #8247 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 12 / #8915 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 13 / #8439 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 12 / #9145 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 15 / #7853 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 13 / #8759 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 18 / #6897 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 9 / #11617 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 17 / #7347 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 18 / #7020 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 17 / #7401 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 18 / #7235 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 17 / #7623 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 35 / #4349 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 8 / #13152 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 24 / #5379 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 23 / #5488 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 33 / #4084 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 27 / #4581 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 44 / #3180 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 35 / #3707 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 26 / #4400 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 42 / #3053 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 37 / #3203 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 28 / #3898 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 31 / #3549 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 37 / #3148 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 38 / #3083 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 50 / #2536 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 24 / #4293 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 38 / #2994 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 42 / #2698 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 40 / #2683 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 42 / #2468 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 25 / #3512 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 32 / #2907 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 48 / #2103 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 37 / #2498 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 32 / #2875 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 39 / #2474 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 38 / #2516 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 37 / #2509 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 35 / #2497 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 52 / #1913 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 47 / #1923 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 56 / #1700 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 51 / #1764 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 58 / #1601 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 55 / #1647 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 50 / #1790 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 63 / #1554 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 64 / #1474 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 72 / #1306 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 79 / #1200 / 0.005% |
| 1966 | 88 / #1132 / 0.005% |
| 1965 | 70 / #1298 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 102 / #1080 / 0.005% |
| 1963 | 92 / #1145 / 0.005% |
| 1962 | 91 / #1147 / 0.005% |
| 1961 | 91 / #1160 / 0.005% |
| 1960 | 83 / #1193 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 72 / #1269 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 95 / #1076 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 87 / #1130 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 99 / #1031 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 100 / #999 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 113 / #906 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 124 / #833 / 0.007% |
| 1952 | 128 / #803 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 105 / #880 / 0.006% |
| 1950 | 131 / #757 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 143 / #711 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 108 / #842 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 122 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 105 / #807 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 85 / #820 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 97 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1943 | 108 / #749 / 0.008% |
| 1942 | 104 / #741 / 0.008% |
| 1941 | 87 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 102 / #691 / 0.009% |
| 1939 | 107 / #658 / 0.010% |
| 1938 | 110 / #653 / 0.010% |
| 1937 | 123 / #608 / 0.012% |
| 1936 | 81 / #746 / 0.008% |
| 1935 | 121 / #591 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 113 / #626 / 0.011% |
| 1933 | 122 / #583 / 0.012% |
| 1932 | 143 / #548 / 0.013% |
| 1931 | 136 / #565 / 0.013% |
| 1930 | 181 / #496 / 0.016% |
| 1929 | 153 / #555 / 0.014% |
| 1928 | 163 / #548 / 0.014% |
| 1927 | 199 / #496 / 0.017% |
| 1926 | 194 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1925 | 172 / #549 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 196 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1923 | 177 / #538 / 0.015% |
| 1922 | 198 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1921 | 214 / #472 / 0.017% |
| 1920 | 184 / #517 / 0.015% |
| 1919 | 177 / #510 / 0.016% |
| 1918 | 199 / #480 / 0.017% |
| 1917 | 168 / #513 / 0.016% |
| 1916 | 162 / #514 / 0.016% |
| 1915 | 111 / #625 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 119 / #512 / 0.016% |
| 1913 | 84 / #560 / 0.013% |
| 1912 | 90 / #509 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 59 / #553 / 0.014% |
| 1910 | 67 / #499 / 0.017% |
| 1909 | 44 / #585 / 0.013% |
| 1908 | 56 / #485 / 0.017% |
| 1907 | 51 / #503 / 0.016% |
| 1906 | 47 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1905 | 51 / #480 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 37 / #554 / 0.013% |
| 1903 | 37 / #537 / 0.014% |
| 1902 | 33 / #579 / 0.013% |
| 1901 | 32 / #543 / 0.013% |
| 1900 | 49 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1899 | 33 / #521 / 0.014% |
| 1898 | 34 / #553 / 0.013% |
| 1897 | 30 / #549 / 0.013% |
| 1896 | 39 / #466 / 0.016% |
| 1895 | 36 / #490 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 30 / #531 / 0.013% |
| 1893 | 31 / #498 / 0.015% |
| 1892 | 33 / #475 / 0.016% |
| 1891 | 39 / #398 / 0.021% |
| 1890 | 34 / #438 / 0.018% |
| 1889 | 28 / #474 / 0.016% |
| 1888 | 46 / #354 / 0.026% |
| 1887 | 22 / #484 / 0.015% |
| 1886 | 25 / #435 / 0.017% |
| 1885 | 39 / #326 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 32 / #355 / 0.025% |
| 1883 | 30 / #327 / 0.027% |
| 1882 | 39 / #286 / 0.036% |
| 1881 | 22 / #356 / 0.024% |
| 1880 | 24 / #332 / 0.026% |