Total babies named Margarita (all years): 40,316
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 111 / #1808 / 0.007% |
| 2023 | 114 / #1788 / 0.007% |
| 2022 | 112 / #1826 / 0.007% |
| 2021 | 95 / #2037 / 0.006% |
| 2020 | 88 / #2091 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 110 / #1848 / 0.007% |
| 2018 | 107 / #1883 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 125 / #1712 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 134 / #1632 / 0.008% |
| 2015 | 125 / #1702 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 132 / #1632 / 0.007% |
| 2013 | 145 / #1521 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 144 / #1535 / 0.008% |
| 2011 | 165 / #1388 / 0.009% |
| 2010 | 169 / #1375 / 0.010% |
| 2009 | 209 / #1202 / 0.011% |
| 2008 | 229 / #1129 / 0.012% |
| 2007 | 245 / #1072 / 0.013% |
| 2006 | 276 / #948 / 0.015% |
| 2005 | 270 / #923 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 259 / #931 / 0.014% |
| 2003 | 289 / #845 / 0.016% |
| 2002 | 333 / #733 / 0.019% |
| 2001 | 360 / #690 / 0.020% |
| 2000 | 378 / #654 / 0.021% |
| 1999 | 367 / #642 / 0.021% |
| 1998 | 394 / #610 / 0.022% |
| 1997 | 467 / #514 / 0.027% |
| 1996 | 465 / #511 / 0.027% |
| 1995 | 458 / #526 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 511 / #487 / 0.029% |
| 1993 | 523 / #483 / 0.029% |
| 1992 | 532 / #463 / 0.029% |
| 1991 | 573 / #447 / 0.031% |
| 1990 | 528 / #464 / 0.028% |
| 1989 | 465 / #506 / 0.025% |
| 1988 | 394 / #553 / 0.022% |
| 1987 | 369 / #545 / 0.021% |
| 1986 | 439 / #489 / 0.026% |
| 1985 | 397 / #511 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 399 / #497 / 0.024% |
| 1983 | 442 / #461 / 0.026% |
| 1982 | 461 / #460 / 0.027% |
| 1981 | 475 / #454 / 0.028% |
| 1980 | 460 / #465 / 0.028% |
| 1979 | 421 / #485 / 0.026% |
| 1978 | 449 / #444 / 0.029% |
| 1977 | 474 / #429 / 0.031% |
| 1976 | 503 / #402 / 0.034% |
| 1975 | 488 / #413 / 0.033% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 488 / #411 / 0.033% |
| 1973 | 463 / #423 / 0.032% |
| 1972 | 456 / #424 / 0.030% |
| 1971 | 517 / #411 / 0.031% |
| 1970 | 501 / #439 / 0.029% |
| 1969 | 528 / #418 / 0.031% |
| 1968 | 537 / #402 / 0.033% |
| 1967 | 524 / #397 / 0.032% |
| 1966 | 566 / #382 / 0.033% |
| 1965 | 495 / #419 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 551 / #415 / 0.029% |
| 1963 | 528 / #420 / 0.027% |
| 1962 | 539 / #421 / 0.027% |
| 1961 | 543 / #419 / 0.027% |
| 1960 | 499 / #436 / 0.025% |
| 1959 | 531 / #410 / 0.026% |
| 1958 | 574 / #384 / 0.029% |
| 1957 | 594 / #372 / 0.029% |
| 1956 | 522 / #393 / 0.026% |
| 1955 | 553 / #375 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 568 / #365 / 0.029% |
| 1953 | 554 / #359 / 0.029% |
| 1952 | 520 / #362 / 0.028% |
| 1951 | 501 / #357 / 0.028% |
| 1950 | 535 / #334 / 0.031% |
| 1949 | 498 / #350 / 0.029% |
| 1948 | 460 / #368 / 0.027% |
| 1947 | 376 / #418 / 0.021% |
| 1946 | 357 / #404 / 0.023% |
| 1945 | 292 / #417 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 260 / #450 / 0.020% |
| 1943 | 302 / #422 / 0.022% |
| 1942 | 280 / #434 / 0.021% |
| 1941 | 259 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1940 | 262 / #423 / 0.023% |
| 1939 | 235 / #439 / 0.021% |
| 1938 | 252 / #423 / 0.023% |
| 1937 | 240 / #417 / 0.023% |
| 1936 | 254 / #401 / 0.024% |
| 1935 | 261 / #400 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 251 / #414 / 0.024% |
| 1933 | 214 / #439 / 0.021% |
| 1932 | 255 / #409 / 0.024% |
| 1931 | 302 / #369 / 0.028% |
| 1930 | 318 / #384 / 0.028% |
| 1929 | 343 / #353 / 0.031% |
| 1928 | 316 / #380 / 0.027% |
| 1927 | 306 / #394 / 0.026% |
| 1926 | 300 / #397 / 0.025% |
| 1925 | 279 / #414 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 275 / #424 / 0.022% |
| 1923 | 280 / #402 / 0.023% |
| 1922 | 246 / #424 / 0.020% |
| 1921 | 274 / #408 / 0.022% |
| 1920 | 254 / #416 / 0.021% |
| 1919 | 190 / #486 / 0.017% |
| 1918 | 179 / #514 / 0.015% |
| 1917 | 153 / #543 / 0.014% |
| 1916 | 138 / #572 / 0.013% |
| 1915 | 130 / #564 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 103 / #551 / 0.014% |
| 1913 | 100 / #510 / 0.016% |
| 1912 | 85 / #528 / 0.015% |
| 1911 | 70 / #494 / 0.017% |
| 1910 | 60 / #530 / 0.015% |
| 1909 | 56 / #504 / 0.016% |
| 1908 | 50 / #516 / 0.015% |
| 1907 | 49 / #516 / 0.015% |
| 1906 | 53 / #469 / 0.018% |
| 1905 | 40 / #551 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 51 / #460 / 0.019% |
| 1903 | 40 / #510 / 0.015% |
| 1902 | 27 / #646 / 0.010% |
| 1901 | 30 / #572 / 0.013% |
| 1900 | 35 / #597 / 0.012% |
| 1899 | 30 / #560 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 23 / #689 / 0.009% |
| 1897 | 32 / #525 / 0.014% |
| 1896 | 22 / #680 / 0.009% |
| 1895 | 22 / #676 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 24 / #604 / 0.011% |
| 1893 | 21 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1892 | 21 / #632 / 0.010% |
| 1891 | 19 / #620 / 0.010% |
| 1890 | 14 / #748 / 0.007% |
| 1889 | 15 / #676 / 0.008% |
| 1888 | 9 / #935 / 0.005% |
| 1887 | 8 / #914 / 0.005% |
| 1886 | 16 / #565 / 0.011% |
| 1885 | 7 / #891 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 11 / #665 / 0.009% |
| 1883 | 6 / #882 / 0.005% |
| 1881 | 7 / #724 / 0.008% |
| 1880 | 5 / #904 / 0.005% |