Total babies named Mandy (all years): 42,573
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 35 / #4154 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 39 / #3883 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 44 / #3573 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 37 / #3982 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 40 / #3719 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 64 / #2701 / 0.004% |
| 2018 | 65 / #2668 / 0.004% |
| 2017 | 74 / #2451 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 83 / #2300 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 70 / #2576 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 105 / #1916 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 83 / #2251 / 0.005% |
| 2012 | 101 / #1950 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 101 / #1963 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 104 / #1932 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 149 / #1526 / 0.008% |
| 2008 | 147 / #1568 / 0.008% |
| 2007 | 227 / #1134 / 0.012% |
| 2006 | 242 / #1059 / 0.013% |
| 2005 | 270 / #922 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 291 / #846 / 0.016% |
| 2003 | 246 / #953 / 0.013% |
| 2002 | 239 / #937 / 0.013% |
| 2001 | 234 / #947 / 0.013% |
| 2000 | 216 / #984 / 0.012% |
| 1999 | 223 / #941 / 0.013% |
| 1998 | 159 / #1176 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 240 / #853 / 0.014% |
| 1996 | 264 / #789 / 0.015% |
| 1995 | 251 / #793 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 275 / #757 / 0.015% |
| 1993 | 338 / #660 / 0.019% |
| 1992 | 351 / #645 / 0.019% |
| 1991 | 416 / #562 / 0.022% |
| 1990 | 526 / #466 / 0.028% |
| 1989 | 585 / #424 / 0.032% |
| 1988 | 796 / #312 / 0.045% |
| 1987 | 958 / #264 / 0.055% |
| 1986 | 1,057 / #246 / 0.062% |
| 1985 | 1,268 / #206 / 0.074% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,095 / #232 / 0.065% |
| 1983 | 1,344 / #197 / 0.080% |
| 1982 | 1,714 / #171 / 0.101% |
| 1981 | 2,088 / #136 / 0.125% |
| 1980 | 2,232 / #132 / 0.134% |
| 1979 | 2,720 / #116 / 0.169% |
| 1978 | 3,110 / #96 / 0.203% |
| 1977 | 3,100 / #94 / 0.202% |
| 1976 | 2,924 / #100 / 0.200% |
| 1975 | 2,710 / #106 / 0.186% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 446 / #435 / 0.030% |
| 1973 | 385 / #472 / 0.026% |
| 1972 | 322 / #528 / 0.021% |
| 1971 | 294 / #593 / 0.018% |
| 1970 | 233 / #682 / 0.013% |
| 1969 | 215 / #678 / 0.013% |
| 1968 | 225 / #647 / 0.014% |
| 1967 | 196 / #700 / 0.012% |
| 1966 | 193 / #708 / 0.011% |
| 1965 | 185 / #733 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 233 / #669 / 0.012% |
| 1963 | 175 / #785 / 0.009% |
| 1962 | 180 / #777 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 147 / #885 / 0.007% |
| 1960 | 147 / #856 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 146 / #845 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 127 / #914 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 141 / #855 / 0.007% |
| 1956 | 91 / #1080 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 42 / #1588 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 35 / #1754 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 41 / #1544 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 39 / #1543 / 0.002% |
| 1951 | 41 / #1475 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 41 / #1443 / 0.002% |
| 1949 | 39 / #1481 / 0.002% |
| 1948 | 42 / #1431 / 0.002% |
| 1947 | 48 / #1328 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 42 / #1350 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 38 / #1305 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 43 / #1217 / 0.003% |
| 1943 | 51 / #1138 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 48 / #1148 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 41 / #1177 / 0.003% |
| 1940 | 42 / #1128 / 0.004% |
| 1939 | 48 / #1032 / 0.004% |
| 1938 | 39 / #1175 / 0.004% |
| 1937 | 42 / #1112 / 0.004% |
| 1936 | 47 / #1017 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 38 / #1153 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 44 / #1061 / 0.004% |
| 1933 | 51 / #966 / 0.005% |
| 1932 | 60 / #911 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 61 / #881 / 0.006% |
| 1930 | 54 / #1008 / 0.005% |
| 1929 | 47 / #1073 / 0.004% |
| 1928 | 72 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 90 / #763 / 0.008% |
| 1926 | 84 / #794 / 0.007% |
| 1925 | 98 / #749 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 77 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1923 | 91 / #766 / 0.008% |
| 1922 | 89 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 103 / #724 / 0.008% |
| 1920 | 89 / #772 / 0.007% |
| 1919 | 100 / #702 / 0.009% |
| 1918 | 111 / #683 / 0.010% |
| 1917 | 79 / #782 / 0.007% |
| 1916 | 97 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 83 / #733 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 89 / #605 / 0.012% |
| 1913 | 52 / #734 / 0.008% |
| 1912 | 61 / #636 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 59 / #552 / 0.014% |
| 1910 | 72 / #477 / 0.018% |
| 1909 | 61 / #481 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 48 / #533 / 0.014% |
| 1907 | 51 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1906 | 50 / #491 / 0.017% |
| 1905 | 67 / #417 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 51 / #459 / 0.019% |
| 1903 | 52 / #446 / 0.020% |
| 1902 | 51 / #438 / 0.019% |
| 1901 | 54 / #408 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 76 / #385 / 0.025% |
| 1899 | 43 / #447 / 0.018% |
| 1898 | 50 / #435 / 0.019% |
| 1897 | 36 / #484 / 0.015% |
| 1896 | 53 / #389 / 0.022% |
| 1895 | 52 / #392 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 56 / #374 / 0.025% |
| 1893 | 50 / #384 / 0.023% |
| 1892 | 56 / #356 / 0.026% |
| 1891 | 46 / #370 / 0.025% |
| 1890 | 48 / #365 / 0.025% |
| 1889 | 44 / #366 / 0.025% |
| 1888 | 58 / #315 / 0.032% |
| 1887 | 37 / #357 / 0.025% |
| 1886 | 69 / #250 / 0.048% |
| 1885 | 55 / #270 / 0.041% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 40 / #311 / 0.031% |
| 1883 | 35 / #298 / 0.031% |
| 1882 | 41 / #275 / 0.038% |
| 1881 | 40 / #255 / 0.044% |
| 1880 | 34 / #269 / 0.037% |