Total babies named Mable (all years): 53,393
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 73 / #2468 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 61 / #2803 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 46 / #3450 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 49 / #3276 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 46 / #3370 / 0.003% |
| 2019 | 37 / #3971 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 38 / #3895 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 38 / #3962 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 31 / #4594 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 22 / #5947 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 22 / #5913 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 23 / #5757 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 23 / #5818 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 10 / #10873 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 17 / #7389 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 15 / #8295 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 18 / #7266 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 19 / #6990 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 21 / #6264 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 12 / #9212 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 11 / #9636 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 7 / #13279 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 11 / #9227 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 12 / #8526 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 31 / #4040 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 16 / #6371 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 8 / #10725 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 9 / #9493 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 12 / #7397 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 13 / #6884 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 6 / #12747 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 10 / #8439 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 13 / #6893 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 8 / #9869 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 11 / #7645 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 11 / #7261 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 13 / #6127 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 21 / #4072 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 11 / #6411 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 20 / #4076 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 15 / #4878 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 18 / #4208 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 27 / #3222 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 20 / #3947 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 29 / #3040 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 24 / #3402 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 20 / #3710 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 23 / #3332 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 26 / #2907 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 27 / #2779 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 34 / #2325 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 35 / #2251 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 34 / #2255 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 40 / #2086 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 45 / #1922 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 48 / #1771 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 52 / #1601 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 59 / #1449 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 80 / #1205 / 0.005% |
| 1965 | 84 / #1175 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 106 / #1055 / 0.006% |
| 1963 | 104 / #1054 / 0.005% |
| 1962 | 131 / #927 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 124 / #969 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 162 / #819 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 163 / #801 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 196 / #705 / 0.010% |
| 1957 | 174 / #756 / 0.009% |
| 1956 | 249 / #607 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 330 / #511 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 247 / #569 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 265 / #528 / 0.014% |
| 1952 | 323 / #469 / 0.017% |
| 1951 | 356 / #442 / 0.020% |
| 1950 | 356 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1949 | 425 / #382 / 0.025% |
| 1948 | 419 / #389 / 0.025% |
| 1947 | 471 / #369 / 0.027% |
| 1946 | 474 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1945 | 451 / #319 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 436 / #325 / 0.033% |
| 1943 | 540 / #299 / 0.039% |
| 1942 | 577 / #283 / 0.043% |
| 1941 | 539 / #276 / 0.045% |
| 1940 | 589 / #257 / 0.052% |
| 1939 | 639 / #248 / 0.058% |
| 1938 | 641 / #249 / 0.058% |
| 1937 | 691 / #236 / 0.065% |
| 1936 | 712 / #229 / 0.068% |
| 1935 | 724 / #232 / 0.069% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 758 / #229 / 0.073% |
| 1933 | 804 / #213 / 0.080% |
| 1932 | 909 / #200 / 0.085% |
| 1931 | 897 / #203 / 0.084% |
| 1930 | 976 / #198 / 0.087% |
| 1929 | 1,060 / #188 / 0.095% |
| 1928 | 1,152 / #180 / 0.100% |
| 1927 | 1,249 / #171 / 0.105% |
| 1926 | 1,389 / #164 / 0.117% |
| 1925 | 1,408 / #166 / 0.116% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,516 / #162 / 0.121% |
| 1923 | 1,472 / #162 / 0.122% |
| 1922 | 1,620 / #152 / 0.135% |
| 1921 | 1,566 / #155 / 0.127% |
| 1920 | 1,579 / #148 / 0.132% |
| 1919 | 1,610 / #143 / 0.142% |
| 1918 | 1,593 / #144 / 0.138% |
| 1917 | 1,463 / #144 / 0.135% |
| 1916 | 1,520 / #136 / 0.146% |
| 1915 | 1,287 / #145 / 0.131% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,081 / #137 / 0.142% |
| 1913 | 907 / #134 / 0.145% |
| 1912 | 919 / #125 / 0.165% |
| 1911 | 659 / #127 / 0.158% |
| 1910 | 679 / #121 / 0.171% |
| 1909 | 586 / #120 / 0.169% |
| 1908 | 566 / #120 / 0.169% |
| 1907 | 569 / #117 / 0.179% |
| 1906 | 510 / #123 / 0.173% |
| 1905 | 562 / #112 / 0.193% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 485 / #121 / 0.176% |
| 1903 | 461 / #122 / 0.176% |
| 1902 | 478 / #119 / 0.181% |
| 1901 | 425 / #121 / 0.178% |
| 1900 | 506 / #124 / 0.169% |
| 1899 | 339 / #137 / 0.145% |
| 1898 | 356 / #143 / 0.138% |
| 1897 | 371 / #131 / 0.158% |
| 1896 | 367 / #130 / 0.154% |
| 1895 | 331 / #138 / 0.142% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 332 / #130 / 0.149% |
| 1893 | 294 / #141 / 0.138% |
| 1892 | 279 / #146 / 0.131% |
| 1891 | 268 / #132 / 0.144% |
| 1890 | 247 / #141 / 0.130% |
| 1889 | 231 / #146 / 0.130% |
| 1888 | 209 / #151 / 0.117% |
| 1887 | 182 / #142 / 0.125% |
| 1886 | 187 / #139 / 0.129% |
| 1885 | 180 / #136 / 0.135% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 139 / #152 / 0.108% |
| 1883 | 120 / #152 / 0.107% |
| 1882 | 125 / #143 / 0.116% |
| 1881 | 88 / #154 / 0.096% |
| 1880 | 83 / #157 / 0.091% |