Total babies named Lyle (all years): 59,985
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 218 / #1018 / 0.013% |
| 2023 | 192 / #1106 / 0.011% |
| 2022 | 209 / #1055 / 0.012% |
| 2021 | 217 / #1011 / 0.012% |
| 2020 | 207 / #1010 / 0.012% |
| 2019 | 235 / #928 / 0.013% |
| 2018 | 220 / #947 / 0.012% |
| 2017 | 205 / #994 / 0.011% |
| 2016 | 208 / #983 / 0.011% |
| 2015 | 183 / #1079 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 172 / #1115 / 0.009% |
| 2013 | 168 / #1103 / 0.009% |
| 2012 | 133 / #1301 / 0.007% |
| 2011 | 137 / #1263 / 0.007% |
| 2010 | 101 / #1572 / 0.005% |
| 2009 | 86 / #1769 / 0.004% |
| 2008 | 78 / #1868 / 0.004% |
| 2007 | 86 / #1736 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 104 / #1474 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 83 / #1643 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 79 / #1646 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 117 / #1244 / 0.006% |
| 2002 | 107 / #1276 / 0.006% |
| 2001 | 100 / #1312 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 102 / #1277 / 0.005% |
| 1999 | 93 / #1305 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 97 / #1258 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 122 / #1047 / 0.006% |
| 1996 | 118 / #1040 / 0.006% |
| 1995 | 143 / #927 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 149 / #890 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 159 / #836 / 0.008% |
| 1992 | 189 / #752 / 0.009% |
| 1991 | 179 / #765 / 0.009% |
| 1990 | 257 / #633 / 0.013% |
| 1989 | 252 / #627 / 0.013% |
| 1988 | 248 / #592 / 0.013% |
| 1987 | 253 / #567 / 0.014% |
| 1986 | 297 / #512 / 0.016% |
| 1985 | 246 / #564 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 255 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1983 | 247 / #530 / 0.014% |
| 1982 | 224 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1981 | 246 / #534 / 0.014% |
| 1980 | 268 / #525 / 0.015% |
| 1979 | 246 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1978 | 235 / #539 / 0.014% |
| 1977 | 279 / #487 / 0.017% |
| 1976 | 221 / #540 / 0.014% |
| 1975 | 247 / #508 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 271 / #484 / 0.017% |
| 1973 | 287 / #460 / 0.018% |
| 1972 | 313 / #449 / 0.019% |
| 1971 | 395 / #406 / 0.022% |
| 1970 | 465 / #376 / 0.025% |
| 1969 | 435 / #376 / 0.024% |
| 1968 | 434 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1967 | 377 / #389 / 0.022% |
| 1966 | 435 / #359 / 0.024% |
| 1965 | 454 / #359 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 515 / #345 / 0.026% |
| 1963 | 575 / #329 / 0.028% |
| 1962 | 644 / #306 / 0.031% |
| 1961 | 659 / #302 / 0.031% |
| 1960 | 730 / #290 / 0.034% |
| 1959 | 761 / #286 / 0.036% |
| 1958 | 770 / #277 / 0.036% |
| 1957 | 838 / #261 / 0.039% |
| 1956 | 794 / #258 / 0.038% |
| 1955 | 821 / #246 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 889 / #237 / 0.044% |
| 1953 | 891 / #226 / 0.045% |
| 1952 | 897 / #222 / 0.046% |
| 1951 | 815 / #232 / 0.043% |
| 1950 | 828 / #223 / 0.046% |
| 1949 | 835 / #220 / 0.047% |
| 1948 | 864 / #216 / 0.049% |
| 1947 | 904 / #212 / 0.049% |
| 1946 | 859 / #200 / 0.053% |
| 1945 | 766 / #194 / 0.057% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 813 / #189 / 0.060% |
| 1943 | 884 / #185 / 0.062% |
| 1942 | 890 / #176 / 0.064% |
| 1941 | 939 / #168 / 0.076% |
| 1940 | 864 / #173 / 0.075% |
| 1939 | 834 / #175 / 0.075% |
| 1938 | 790 / #183 / 0.071% |
| 1937 | 875 / #167 / 0.082% |
| 1936 | 910 / #159 / 0.088% |
| 1935 | 934 / #156 / 0.090% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 939 / #155 / 0.091% |
| 1933 | 916 / #158 / 0.092% |
| 1932 | 969 / #155 / 0.093% |
| 1931 | 944 / #157 / 0.091% |
| 1930 | 947 / #160 / 0.086% |
| 1929 | 1,007 / #152 / 0.094% |
| 1928 | 999 / #155 / 0.090% |
| 1927 | 1,054 / #151 / 0.094% |
| 1926 | 1,051 / #152 / 0.095% |
| 1925 | 1,012 / #154 / 0.091% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,000 / #159 / 0.088% |
| 1923 | 1,011 / #154 / 0.092% |
| 1922 | 1,055 / #146 / 0.097% |
| 1921 | 1,007 / #150 / 0.091% |
| 1920 | 967 / #151 / 0.091% |
| 1919 | 877 / #153 / 0.089% |
| 1918 | 993 / #145 / 0.098% |
| 1917 | 855 / #153 / 0.092% |
| 1916 | 806 / #153 / 0.091% |
| 1915 | 719 / #159 / 0.085% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 495 / #178 / 0.076% |
| 1913 | 342 / #196 / 0.067% |
| 1912 | 325 / #181 / 0.076% |
| 1911 | 128 / #224 / 0.057% |
| 1910 | 117 / #216 / 0.060% |
| 1909 | 72 / #262 / 0.044% |
| 1908 | 75 / #246 / 0.049% |
| 1907 | 76 / #235 / 0.052% |
| 1906 | 93 / #195 / 0.070% |
| 1905 | 61 / #249 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 74 / #215 / 0.058% |
| 1903 | 66 / #224 / 0.055% |
| 1902 | 48 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1901 | 60 / #226 / 0.056% |
| 1900 | 49 / #298 / 0.033% |
| 1899 | 42 / #262 / 0.040% |
| 1898 | 56 / #233 / 0.046% |
| 1897 | 39 / #293 / 0.035% |
| 1896 | 35 / #320 / 0.029% |
| 1895 | 40 / #281 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 48 / #250 / 0.041% |
| 1893 | 29 / #328 / 0.026% |
| 1892 | 29 / #353 / 0.024% |
| 1891 | 31 / #302 / 0.031% |
| 1890 | 22 / #382 / 0.020% |
| 1889 | 18 / #438 / 0.016% |
| 1888 | 22 / #400 / 0.018% |
| 1887 | 17 / #417 / 0.017% |
| 1886 | 12 / #564 / 0.011% |
| 1885 | 13 / #538 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 12 / #561 / 0.010% |
| 1883 | 7 / #772 / 0.007% |
| 1882 | 12 / #565 / 0.011% |
| 1881 | 6 / #834 / 0.006% |
| 1880 | 7 / #783 / 0.006% |