Total babies named Ludwig (all years): 2,684
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 / #8064 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 9 / #8653 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 9 / #8715 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 13 / #6543 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 8 / #9218 / 0.000% |
| 2018 | 11 / #7424 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 6 / #11627 / 0.000% |
| 2016 | 8 / #9363 / 0.000% |
| 2015 | 13 / #6559 / 0.001% |
| 2014 | 7 / #10308 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 12 / #6867 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 10 / #7911 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 9 / #8513 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 5 / #13494 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 10 / #8072 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 6 / #11993 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 7 / #10457 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 8 / #9253 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 10 / #7455 / 0.001% |
| 2004 | 9 / #7938 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 7 / #9027 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 5 / #11644 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 9 / #7185 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 7 / #8382 / 0.000% |
| 1998 | 7 / #8116 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 6 / #8840 / 0.000% |
| 1996 | 11 / #5400 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 6 / #8459 / 0.000% |
| 1994 | 9 / #6156 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 8 / #6601 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1992 | 9 / #5944 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 10 / #5342 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 6 / #7729 / 0.000% |
| 1989 | 8 / #5994 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 15 / #3458 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 6 / #6626 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 6 / #6413 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 5 / #7165 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 7 / #5334 / 0.000% |
| 1983 | 12 / #3545 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1982 | 11 / #3840 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 6 / #5957 / 0.000% |
| 1980 | 6 / #5961 / 0.000% |
| 1979 | 8 / #4674 / 0.000% |
| 1978 | 9 / #4041 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 9 / #4038 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 9 / #3887 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 6 / #5192 / 0.000% |
| 1974 | 9 / #3729 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 10 / #3268 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1971 | 7 / #4212 / 0.000% |
| 1970 | 8 / #3709 / 0.000% |
| 1969 | 8 / #3477 / 0.000% |
| 1968 | 16 / #2078 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 10 / #2709 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 11 / #2567 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 17 / #1968 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 13 / #2372 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 23 / #1681 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 13 / #2325 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1961 | 15 / #2196 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 8 / #3237 / 0.000% |
| 1959 | 15 / #2167 / 0.001% |
| 1958 | 17 / #1993 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 21 / #1775 / 0.001% |
| 1956 | 15 / #2140 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 19 / #1826 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 16 / #2016 / 0.001% |
| 1953 | 24 / #1570 / 0.001% |
| 1952 | 18 / #1837 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1951 | 17 / #1881 / 0.001% |
| 1950 | 13 / #2162 / 0.001% |
| 1949 | 19 / #1737 / 0.001% |
| 1948 | 11 / #2396 / 0.001% |
| 1947 | 27 / #1438 / 0.001% |
| 1946 | 21 / #1585 / 0.001% |
| 1945 | 20 / #1518 / 0.001% |
| 1944 | 18 / #1661 / 0.001% |
| 1943 | 18 / #1745 / 0.001% |
| 1942 | 20 / #1615 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1941 | 19 / #1621 / 0.002% |
| 1940 | 25 / #1352 / 0.002% |
| 1939 | 28 / #1259 / 0.003% |
| 1938 | 38 / #1057 / 0.003% |
| 1937 | 38 / #1047 / 0.004% |
| 1936 | 38 / #1040 / 0.004% |
| 1935 | 37 / #1071 / 0.004% |
| 1934 | 33 / #1163 / 0.003% |
| 1933 | 44 / #957 / 0.004% |
| 1932 | 39 / #1084 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1931 | 49 / #932 / 0.005% |
| 1930 | 37 / #1166 / 0.003% |
| 1929 | 46 / #1002 / 0.004% |
| 1928 | 41 / #1108 / 0.004% |
| 1927 | 60 / #878 / 0.005% |
| 1926 | 50 / #973 / 0.005% |
| 1925 | 39 / #1137 / 0.003% |
| 1924 | 54 / #958 / 0.005% |
| 1923 | 53 / #946 / 0.005% |
| 1922 | 66 / #848 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1921 | 54 / #957 / 0.005% |
| 1920 | 61 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1919 | 67 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 67 / #800 / 0.007% |
| 1917 | 78 / #685 / 0.008% |
| 1916 | 88 / #625 / 0.010% |
| 1915 | 75 / #674 / 0.009% |
| 1914 | 58 / #671 / 0.009% |
| 1913 | 49 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1912 | 34 / #745 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1911 | 23 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 16 / #771 / 0.008% |
| 1909 | 9 / #1056 / 0.005% |
| 1908 | 20 / #572 / 0.013% |
| 1907 | 6 / #1283 / 0.004% |
| 1906 | 9 / #892 / 0.007% |
| 1905 | 15 / #627 / 0.011% |
| 1904 | 5 / #1326 / 0.004% |
| 1903 | 13 / #641 / 0.011% |
| 1902 | 13 / #638 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1901 | 5 / #1152 / 0.005% |
| 1900 | 10 / #882 / 0.007% |
| 1899 | 10 / #689 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 5 / #1238 / 0.004% |
| 1897 | 16 / #508 / 0.014% |
| 1896 | 12 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1895 | 15 / #545 / 0.013% |
| 1894 | 6 / #1031 / 0.005% |
| 1893 | 15 / #493 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 12 / #624 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1891 | 7 / #813 / 0.007% |
| 1890 | 10 / #651 / 0.009% |
| 1889 | 7 / #854 / 0.006% |
| 1888 | 6 / #1003 / 0.005% |
| 1887 | 5 / #1005 / 0.005% |
| 1886 | 11 / #590 / 0.010% |
| 1885 | 8 / #740 / 0.007% |
| 1884 | 9 / #684 / 0.008% |
| 1883 | 6 / #851 / 0.006% |
| 1882 | 6 / #908 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1880 | 9 / #666 / 0.008% |