Total babies named Logan (all years): 413,411
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 6,267 / #46 / 0.365% |
| 2023 | 6,704 / #39 / 0.392% |
| 2022 | 7,608 / #33 / 0.436% |
| 2021 | 8,831 / #21 / 0.505% |
| 2020 | 9,161 / #16 / 0.531% |
| 2019 | 10,563 / #16 / 0.589% |
| 2018 | 12,443 / #10 / 0.685% |
| 2017 | 14,057 / #5 / 0.760% |
| 2016 | 11,278 / #18 / 0.594% |
| 2015 | 12,936 / #14 / 0.675% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 13,668 / #13 / 0.712% |
| 2013 | 12,365 / #18 / 0.654% |
| 2012 | 12,488 / #22 / 0.658% |
| 2011 | 12,997 / #21 / 0.684% |
| 2010 | 14,030 / #17 / 0.731% |
| 2009 | 14,466 / #17 / 0.729% |
| 2008 | 13,861 / #19 / 0.679% |
| 2007 | 15,330 / #17 / 0.739% |
| 2006 | 15,151 / #20 / 0.737% |
| 2005 | 13,475 / #26 / 0.675% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 13,140 / #27 / 0.662% |
| 2003 | 13,187 / #28 / 0.668% |
| 2002 | 12,974 / #29 / 0.668% |
| 2001 | 12,710 / #29 / 0.654% |
| 2000 | 9,737 / #40 / 0.496% |
| 1999 | 9,135 / #42 / 0.476% |
| 1998 | 8,639 / #44 / 0.452% |
| 1997 | 8,620 / #42 / 0.457% |
| 1996 | 8,374 / #42 / 0.442% |
| 1995 | 6,953 / #51 / 0.365% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 5,457 / #70 / 0.282% |
| 1993 | 4,842 / #76 / 0.247% |
| 1992 | 4,226 / #89 / 0.212% |
| 1991 | 3,893 / #94 / 0.193% |
| 1990 | 3,433 / #104 / 0.167% |
| 1989 | 3,281 / #104 / 0.164% |
| 1988 | 2,758 / #109 / 0.144% |
| 1987 | 1,951 / #144 / 0.105% |
| 1986 | 1,329 / #192 / 0.072% |
| 1985 | 998 / #232 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 988 / #227 / 0.055% |
| 1983 | 780 / #265 / 0.044% |
| 1982 | 688 / #294 / 0.038% |
| 1981 | 693 / #290 / 0.039% |
| 1980 | 519 / #348 / 0.029% |
| 1979 | 469 / #370 / 0.027% |
| 1978 | 307 / #455 / 0.019% |
| 1977 | 204 / #592 / 0.012% |
| 1976 | 113 / #782 / 0.007% |
| 1975 | 85 / #898 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 71 / #975 / 0.005% |
| 1973 | 69 / #978 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 61 / #1037 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 56 / #1096 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 55 / #1109 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 48 / #1132 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 59 / #951 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 52 / #1013 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 59 / #947 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 48 / #1075 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 66 / #940 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 46 / #1145 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 60 / #993 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 50 / #1112 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 58 / #1015 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 54 / #1055 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 47 / #1122 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 44 / #1177 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 44 / #1151 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 65 / #926 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 59 / #970 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 58 / #945 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 51 / #1010 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 62 / #895 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 48 / #1015 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 53 / #951 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 56 / #926 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 59 / #911 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 50 / #948 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 49 / #924 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 48 / #926 / 0.004% |
| 1943 | 54 / #914 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 37 / #1132 / 0.003% |
| 1941 | 45 / #958 / 0.004% |
| 1940 | 56 / #846 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 44 / #950 / 0.004% |
| 1938 | 38 / #1056 / 0.003% |
| 1937 | 38 / #1046 / 0.004% |
| 1936 | 43 / #943 / 0.004% |
| 1935 | 43 / #977 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 63 / #782 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 60 / #796 / 0.006% |
| 1932 | 65 / #790 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 44 / #1007 / 0.004% |
| 1930 | 44 / #1043 / 0.004% |
| 1929 | 69 / #777 / 0.006% |
| 1928 | 47 / #1015 / 0.004% |
| 1927 | 65 / #835 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 52 / #950 / 0.005% |
| 1925 | 80 / #726 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 86 / #712 / 0.008% |
| 1923 | 61 / #878 / 0.006% |
| 1922 | 73 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 86 / #702 / 0.008% |
| 1920 | 74 / #771 / 0.007% |
| 1919 | 81 / #694 / 0.008% |
| 1918 | 85 / #677 / 0.008% |
| 1917 | 94 / #613 / 0.010% |
| 1916 | 79 / #666 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 55 / #829 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 65 / #629 / 0.010% |
| 1913 | 38 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1912 | 35 / #731 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 17 / #809 / 0.008% |
| 1910 | 17 / #743 / 0.009% |
| 1909 | 18 / #646 / 0.011% |
| 1908 | 12 / #806 / 0.008% |
| 1907 | 8 / #1058 / 0.005% |
| 1906 | 11 / #788 / 0.008% |
| 1905 | 19 / #540 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 13 / #670 / 0.010% |
| 1903 | 12 / #683 / 0.010% |
| 1902 | 13 / #634 / 0.011% |
| 1901 | 8 / #819 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 22 / #501 / 0.015% |
| 1899 | 10 / #686 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 18 / #499 / 0.015% |
| 1897 | 16 / #507 / 0.014% |
| 1896 | 15 / #547 / 0.013% |
| 1895 | 15 / #543 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 16 / #511 / 0.014% |
| 1893 | 15 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 14 / #563 / 0.011% |
| 1891 | 15 / #464 / 0.015% |
| 1890 | 15 / #500 / 0.014% |
| 1889 | 32 / #309 / 0.029% |
| 1888 | 18 / #458 / 0.015% |
| 1887 | 29 / #308 / 0.029% |
| 1886 | 30 / #315 / 0.027% |
| 1885 | 32 / #304 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 63 / #208 / 0.055% |
| 1883 | 20 / #389 / 0.019% |
| 1882 | 17 / #444 / 0.015% |
| 1881 | 13 / #496 / 0.013% |
| 1880 | 13 / #514 / 0.012% |