Total babies named Lila (all years): 74,864
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,475 / #207 / 0.091% |
| 2023 | 1,398 / #213 / 0.087% |
| 2022 | 1,354 / #221 / 0.083% |
| 2021 | 1,339 / #223 / 0.082% |
| 2020 | 1,298 / #228 / 0.080% |
| 2019 | 1,372 / #228 / 0.082% |
| 2018 | 1,405 / #225 / 0.083% |
| 2017 | 1,473 / #210 / 0.085% |
| 2016 | 1,561 / #210 / 0.088% |
| 2015 | 1,658 / #199 / 0.093% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,776 / #184 / 0.099% |
| 2013 | 1,703 / #190 / 0.097% |
| 2012 | 1,728 / #182 / 0.098% |
| 2011 | 1,921 / #163 / 0.109% |
| 2010 | 1,969 / #155 / 0.111% |
| 2009 | 1,935 / #168 / 0.105% |
| 2008 | 1,852 / #180 / 0.098% |
| 2007 | 1,357 / #259 / 0.071% |
| 2006 | 1,006 / #329 / 0.053% |
| 2005 | 680 / #448 / 0.037% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 599 / #491 / 0.033% |
| 2003 | 491 / #569 / 0.027% |
| 2002 | 414 / #618 / 0.023% |
| 2001 | 394 / #641 / 0.022% |
| 2000 | 307 / #751 / 0.017% |
| 1999 | 312 / #724 / 0.018% |
| 1998 | 224 / #930 / 0.013% |
| 1997 | 155 / #1183 / 0.009% |
| 1996 | 131 / #1313 / 0.007% |
| 1995 | 124 / #1333 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 139 / #1244 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 106 / #1500 / 0.006% |
| 1992 | 109 / #1457 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 134 / #1258 / 0.007% |
| 1990 | 125 / #1304 / 0.007% |
| 1989 | 126 / #1254 / 0.007% |
| 1988 | 103 / #1379 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 112 / #1262 / 0.006% |
| 1986 | 114 / #1217 / 0.007% |
| 1985 | 132 / #1101 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 98 / #1281 / 0.006% |
| 1983 | 123 / #1107 / 0.007% |
| 1982 | 148 / #1002 / 0.009% |
| 1981 | 149 / #985 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 150 / #988 / 0.009% |
| 1979 | 137 / #1026 / 0.009% |
| 1978 | 114 / #1135 / 0.007% |
| 1977 | 118 / #1099 / 0.008% |
| 1976 | 112 / #1089 / 0.008% |
| 1975 | 103 / #1134 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 148 / #879 / 0.010% |
| 1973 | 135 / #912 / 0.009% |
| 1972 | 132 / #933 / 0.009% |
| 1971 | 112 / #1081 / 0.007% |
| 1970 | 123 / #1014 / 0.007% |
| 1969 | 141 / #888 / 0.008% |
| 1968 | 115 / #970 / 0.007% |
| 1967 | 126 / #912 / 0.008% |
| 1966 | 146 / #825 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 167 / #767 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 227 / #678 / 0.012% |
| 1963 | 234 / #661 / 0.012% |
| 1962 | 195 / #738 / 0.010% |
| 1961 | 263 / #629 / 0.013% |
| 1960 | 291 / #580 / 0.014% |
| 1959 | 304 / #560 / 0.015% |
| 1958 | 293 / #579 / 0.015% |
| 1957 | 362 / #497 / 0.018% |
| 1956 | 428 / #443 / 0.021% |
| 1955 | 355 / #483 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 359 / #467 / 0.018% |
| 1953 | 340 / #458 / 0.018% |
| 1952 | 414 / #419 / 0.022% |
| 1951 | 363 / #439 / 0.020% |
| 1950 | 351 / #432 / 0.020% |
| 1949 | 388 / #405 / 0.023% |
| 1948 | 421 / #388 / 0.025% |
| 1947 | 411 / #397 / 0.023% |
| 1946 | 386 / #387 / 0.025% |
| 1945 | 368 / #362 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 414 / #338 / 0.031% |
| 1943 | 487 / #316 / 0.035% |
| 1942 | 482 / #316 / 0.036% |
| 1941 | 522 / #282 / 0.043% |
| 1940 | 529 / #270 / 0.046% |
| 1939 | 482 / #284 / 0.044% |
| 1938 | 531 / #275 / 0.048% |
| 1937 | 578 / #257 / 0.054% |
| 1936 | 646 / #244 / 0.062% |
| 1935 | 753 / #226 / 0.072% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 844 / #210 / 0.081% |
| 1933 | 859 / #204 / 0.085% |
| 1932 | 949 / #193 / 0.089% |
| 1931 | 995 / #184 / 0.093% |
| 1930 | 1,203 / #170 / 0.107% |
| 1929 | 1,108 / #180 / 0.099% |
| 1928 | 1,034 / #195 / 0.090% |
| 1927 | 1,059 / #193 / 0.089% |
| 1926 | 1,085 / #190 / 0.092% |
| 1925 | 1,248 / #175 / 0.103% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,053 / #199 / 0.084% |
| 1923 | 1,064 / #196 / 0.088% |
| 1922 | 919 / #212 / 0.077% |
| 1921 | 894 / #213 / 0.073% |
| 1920 | 840 / #227 / 0.070% |
| 1919 | 749 / #227 / 0.066% |
| 1918 | 748 / #231 / 0.065% |
| 1917 | 678 / #240 / 0.063% |
| 1916 | 708 / #230 / 0.068% |
| 1915 | 684 / #230 / 0.070% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 561 / #226 / 0.074% |
| 1913 | 430 / #231 / 0.069% |
| 1912 | 396 / #226 / 0.071% |
| 1911 | 302 / #227 / 0.072% |
| 1910 | 311 / #209 / 0.078% |
| 1909 | 259 / #219 / 0.075% |
| 1908 | 254 / #213 / 0.076% |
| 1907 | 218 / #224 / 0.068% |
| 1906 | 242 / #196 / 0.082% |
| 1905 | 211 / #212 / 0.072% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 259 / #186 / 0.094% |
| 1903 | 206 / #203 / 0.079% |
| 1902 | 239 / #189 / 0.091% |
| 1901 | 181 / #214 / 0.076% |
| 1900 | 268 / #191 / 0.089% |
| 1899 | 190 / #202 / 0.082% |
| 1898 | 208 / #204 / 0.080% |
| 1897 | 176 / #207 / 0.075% |
| 1896 | 201 / #195 / 0.084% |
| 1895 | 175 / #204 / 0.075% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 161 / #211 / 0.072% |
| 1893 | 167 / #200 / 0.078% |
| 1892 | 147 / #211 / 0.069% |
| 1891 | 128 / #208 / 0.069% |
| 1890 | 120 / #222 / 0.063% |
| 1889 | 113 / #217 / 0.063% |
| 1888 | 88 / #248 / 0.049% |
| 1887 | 74 / #244 / 0.051% |
| 1886 | 69 / #249 / 0.048% |
| 1885 | 62 / #254 / 0.047% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 73 / #224 / 0.057% |
| 1883 | 69 / #213 / 0.061% |
| 1882 | 65 / #206 / 0.060% |
| 1881 | 42 / #245 / 0.046% |
| 1880 | 36 / #257 / 0.040% |