Total babies named Leo (all years): 253,873
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 7,793 / #24 / 0.454% |
| 2023 | 8,152 / #18 / 0.477% |
| 2022 | 8,290 / #22 / 0.475% |
| 2021 | 7,802 / #31 / 0.446% |
| 2020 | 7,222 / #36 / 0.419% |
| 2019 | 7,501 / #40 / 0.418% |
| 2018 | 6,772 / #50 / 0.373% |
| 2017 | 5,965 / #62 / 0.322% |
| 2016 | 5,299 / #74 / 0.279% |
| 2015 | 4,602 / #91 / 0.240% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 3,976 / #97 / 0.207% |
| 2013 | 3,510 / #112 / 0.186% |
| 2012 | 2,879 / #134 / 0.152% |
| 2011 | 2,250 / #167 / 0.118% |
| 2010 | 1,946 / #191 / 0.101% |
| 2009 | 1,802 / #210 / 0.091% |
| 2008 | 1,628 / #228 / 0.080% |
| 2007 | 1,531 / #238 / 0.074% |
| 2006 | 1,501 / #235 / 0.073% |
| 2005 | 1,275 / #259 / 0.064% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,239 / #265 / 0.062% |
| 2003 | 1,095 / #285 / 0.055% |
| 2002 | 809 / #339 / 0.042% |
| 2001 | 736 / #360 / 0.038% |
| 2000 | 658 / #388 / 0.034% |
| 1999 | 524 / #441 / 0.027% |
| 1998 | 527 / #434 / 0.028% |
| 1997 | 458 / #471 / 0.024% |
| 1996 | 447 / #482 / 0.024% |
| 1995 | 446 / #486 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 474 / #462 / 0.025% |
| 1993 | 456 / #465 / 0.023% |
| 1992 | 469 / #463 / 0.023% |
| 1991 | 506 / #441 / 0.025% |
| 1990 | 431 / #477 / 0.021% |
| 1989 | 428 / #454 / 0.021% |
| 1988 | 451 / #426 / 0.024% |
| 1987 | 452 / #410 / 0.024% |
| 1986 | 415 / #422 / 0.023% |
| 1985 | 447 / #405 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 430 / #396 / 0.024% |
| 1983 | 429 / #388 / 0.024% |
| 1982 | 483 / #366 / 0.027% |
| 1981 | 534 / #341 / 0.030% |
| 1980 | 473 / #367 / 0.027% |
| 1979 | 483 / #362 / 0.028% |
| 1978 | 478 / #353 / 0.029% |
| 1977 | 484 / #359 / 0.029% |
| 1976 | 481 / #348 / 0.031% |
| 1975 | 516 / #336 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 511 / #340 / 0.033% |
| 1973 | 509 / #335 / 0.033% |
| 1972 | 550 / #327 / 0.034% |
| 1971 | 651 / #302 / 0.037% |
| 1970 | 702 / #294 / 0.038% |
| 1969 | 741 / #273 / 0.041% |
| 1968 | 695 / #279 / 0.040% |
| 1967 | 767 / #262 / 0.044% |
| 1966 | 856 / #244 / 0.048% |
| 1965 | 902 / #247 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,027 / #233 / 0.052% |
| 1963 | 1,015 / #237 / 0.050% |
| 1962 | 1,101 / #232 / 0.053% |
| 1961 | 1,178 / #230 / 0.055% |
| 1960 | 1,203 / #230 / 0.056% |
| 1959 | 1,432 / #202 / 0.067% |
| 1958 | 1,428 / #195 / 0.067% |
| 1957 | 1,511 / #190 / 0.070% |
| 1956 | 1,550 / #184 / 0.073% |
| 1955 | 1,576 / #175 / 0.077% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,613 / #172 / 0.079% |
| 1953 | 1,657 / #162 / 0.084% |
| 1952 | 1,558 / #171 / 0.080% |
| 1951 | 1,658 / #156 / 0.088% |
| 1950 | 1,554 / #160 / 0.087% |
| 1949 | 1,646 / #153 / 0.093% |
| 1948 | 1,718 / #151 / 0.098% |
| 1947 | 1,805 / #147 / 0.099% |
| 1946 | 1,647 / #147 / 0.101% |
| 1945 | 1,582 / #139 / 0.118% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,592 / #132 / 0.117% |
| 1943 | 1,694 / #133 / 0.119% |
| 1942 | 1,800 / #120 / 0.130% |
| 1941 | 1,725 / #116 / 0.140% |
| 1940 | 1,753 / #112 / 0.151% |
| 1939 | 1,842 / #108 / 0.166% |
| 1938 | 1,952 / #104 / 0.176% |
| 1937 | 2,015 / #97 / 0.189% |
| 1936 | 2,017 / #94 / 0.194% |
| 1935 | 2,142 / #92 / 0.206% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 2,309 / #86 / 0.224% |
| 1933 | 2,352 / #75 / 0.237% |
| 1932 | 2,500 / #74 / 0.239% |
| 1931 | 2,700 / #69 / 0.260% |
| 1930 | 3,035 / #63 / 0.277% |
| 1929 | 3,018 / #60 / 0.281% |
| 1928 | 3,095 / #61 / 0.279% |
| 1927 | 3,536 / #55 / 0.314% |
| 1926 | 3,552 / #54 / 0.320% |
| 1925 | 3,775 / #54 / 0.338% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 3,990 / #51 / 0.352% |
| 1923 | 3,973 / #49 / 0.362% |
| 1922 | 3,901 / #51 / 0.359% |
| 1921 | 4,066 / #50 / 0.369% |
| 1920 | 4,054 / #48 / 0.381% |
| 1919 | 3,802 / #49 / 0.388% |
| 1918 | 4,036 / #48 / 0.398% |
| 1917 | 3,779 / #47 / 0.408% |
| 1916 | 3,621 / #47 / 0.407% |
| 1915 | 3,527 / #47 / 0.416% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 2,655 / #47 / 0.405% |
| 1913 | 2,031 / #48 / 0.396% |
| 1912 | 1,654 / #49 / 0.385% |
| 1911 | 844 / #51 / 0.374% |
| 1910 | 707 / #51 / 0.364% |
| 1909 | 609 / #49 / 0.371% |
| 1908 | 584 / #49 / 0.378% |
| 1907 | 651 / #42 / 0.443% |
| 1906 | 508 / #47 / 0.382% |
| 1905 | 512 / #46 / 0.387% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 552 / #42 / 0.431% |
| 1903 | 636 / #38 / 0.533% |
| 1902 | 551 / #43 / 0.449% |
| 1901 | 456 / #42 / 0.428% |
| 1900 | 570 / #46 / 0.379% |
| 1899 | 482 / #43 / 0.454% |
| 1898 | 588 / #39 / 0.479% |
| 1897 | 462 / #46 / 0.410% |
| 1896 | 497 / #47 / 0.416% |
| 1895 | 509 / #42 / 0.434% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 515 / #42 / 0.445% |
| 1893 | 448 / #45 / 0.399% |
| 1892 | 444 / #49 / 0.364% |
| 1891 | 353 / #51 / 0.349% |
| 1890 | 393 / #49 / 0.354% |
| 1889 | 325 / #59 / 0.294% |
| 1888 | 353 / #59 / 0.292% |
| 1887 | 232 / #74 / 0.229% |
| 1886 | 240 / #73 / 0.217% |
| 1885 | 199 / #83 / 0.185% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 192 / #84 / 0.168% |
| 1883 | 142 / #95 / 0.136% |
| 1882 | 146 / #99 / 0.128% |
| 1881 | 122 / #103 / 0.121% |
| 1880 | 147 / #93 / 0.133% |