Total babies named Laurence (all years): 40,117
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 66 / #2196 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 68 / #2137 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 54 / #2540 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 62 / #2265 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 72 / #1989 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 61 / #2277 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 61 / #2250 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 72 / #1991 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 56 / #2354 / 0.003% |
| 2015 | 60 / #2249 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 59 / #2264 / 0.003% |
| 2013 | 45 / #2648 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 51 / #2470 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 48 / #2572 / 0.003% |
| 2010 | 41 / #2901 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 56 / #2337 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 53 / #2419 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 55 / #2355 / 0.003% |
| 2006 | 71 / #1905 / 0.003% |
| 2005 | 61 / #2051 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 71 / #1773 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 81 / #1575 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 74 / #1627 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 68 / #1704 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 71 / #1649 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 86 / #1380 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 97 / #1257 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 91 / #1269 / 0.005% |
| 1996 | 109 / #1104 / 0.006% |
| 1995 | 124 / #998 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 103 / #1114 / 0.005% |
| 1993 | 101 / #1121 / 0.005% |
| 1992 | 124 / #971 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 116 / #996 / 0.006% |
| 1990 | 122 / #936 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 145 / #828 / 0.007% |
| 1988 | 106 / #932 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 115 / #873 / 0.006% |
| 1986 | 119 / #831 / 0.006% |
| 1985 | 138 / #759 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 153 / #707 / 0.008% |
| 1983 | 134 / #748 / 0.007% |
| 1982 | 165 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1981 | 167 / #668 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 161 / #683 / 0.009% |
| 1979 | 152 / #695 / 0.009% |
| 1978 | 139 / #714 / 0.008% |
| 1977 | 158 / #674 / 0.010% |
| 1976 | 174 / #622 / 0.011% |
| 1975 | 179 / #608 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 184 / #588 / 0.012% |
| 1973 | 204 / #555 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 214 / #544 / 0.013% |
| 1971 | 231 / #529 / 0.013% |
| 1970 | 303 / #466 / 0.016% |
| 1969 | 302 / #448 / 0.017% |
| 1968 | 321 / #429 / 0.018% |
| 1967 | 348 / #408 / 0.020% |
| 1966 | 350 / #405 / 0.020% |
| 1965 | 364 / #411 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 456 / #364 / 0.023% |
| 1963 | 503 / #345 / 0.025% |
| 1962 | 520 / #341 / 0.025% |
| 1961 | 539 / #339 / 0.025% |
| 1960 | 513 / #344 / 0.024% |
| 1959 | 518 / #341 / 0.024% |
| 1958 | 541 / #331 / 0.025% |
| 1957 | 607 / #308 / 0.028% |
| 1956 | 651 / #288 / 0.031% |
| 1955 | 641 / #284 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 709 / #264 / 0.035% |
| 1953 | 748 / #250 / 0.038% |
| 1952 | 845 / #231 / 0.043% |
| 1951 | 822 / #229 / 0.044% |
| 1950 | 807 / #227 / 0.045% |
| 1949 | 802 / #226 / 0.045% |
| 1948 | 768 / #233 / 0.044% |
| 1947 | 778 / #232 / 0.043% |
| 1946 | 708 / #224 / 0.044% |
| 1945 | 591 / #227 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 581 / #233 / 0.043% |
| 1943 | 648 / #225 / 0.045% |
| 1942 | 666 / #219 / 0.048% |
| 1941 | 524 / #244 / 0.043% |
| 1940 | 604 / #211 / 0.052% |
| 1939 | 549 / #220 / 0.050% |
| 1938 | 478 / #246 / 0.043% |
| 1937 | 448 / #254 / 0.042% |
| 1936 | 432 / #258 / 0.042% |
| 1935 | 427 / #261 / 0.041% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 489 / #236 / 0.047% |
| 1933 | 426 / #255 / 0.043% |
| 1932 | 479 / #244 / 0.046% |
| 1931 | 518 / #228 / 0.050% |
| 1930 | 562 / #226 / 0.051% |
| 1929 | 586 / #217 / 0.054% |
| 1928 | 573 / #229 / 0.052% |
| 1927 | 583 / #228 / 0.052% |
| 1926 | 610 / #221 / 0.055% |
| 1925 | 551 / #239 / 0.049% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 575 / #238 / 0.051% |
| 1923 | 543 / #241 / 0.050% |
| 1922 | 580 / #230 / 0.053% |
| 1921 | 599 / #223 / 0.054% |
| 1920 | 550 / #228 / 0.052% |
| 1919 | 531 / #227 / 0.054% |
| 1918 | 557 / #222 / 0.055% |
| 1917 | 495 / #222 / 0.053% |
| 1916 | 470 / #227 / 0.053% |
| 1915 | 462 / #222 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 379 / #214 / 0.058% |
| 1913 | 314 / #209 / 0.061% |
| 1912 | 271 / #204 / 0.063% |
| 1911 | 121 / #233 / 0.054% |
| 1910 | 114 / #219 / 0.059% |
| 1909 | 89 / #234 / 0.054% |
| 1908 | 91 / #217 / 0.059% |
| 1907 | 78 / #230 / 0.053% |
| 1906 | 81 / #218 / 0.061% |
| 1905 | 77 / #218 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 73 / #217 / 0.057% |
| 1903 | 77 / #202 / 0.065% |
| 1902 | 71 / #212 / 0.058% |
| 1901 | 60 / #224 / 0.056% |
| 1900 | 81 / #220 / 0.054% |
| 1899 | 63 / #209 / 0.059% |
| 1898 | 74 / #201 / 0.060% |
| 1897 | 69 / #206 / 0.061% |
| 1896 | 59 / #236 / 0.049% |
| 1895 | 58 / #232 / 0.049% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 46 / #258 / 0.040% |
| 1893 | 53 / #237 / 0.047% |
| 1892 | 45 / #268 / 0.037% |
| 1891 | 39 / #258 / 0.039% |
| 1890 | 42 / #268 / 0.038% |
| 1889 | 32 / #308 / 0.029% |
| 1888 | 38 / #287 / 0.031% |
| 1887 | 28 / #315 / 0.028% |
| 1886 | 43 / #261 / 0.039% |
| 1885 | 33 / #293 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 24 / #366 / 0.021% |
| 1883 | 28 / #315 / 0.027% |
| 1882 | 24 / #368 / 0.021% |
| 1881 | 28 / #310 / 0.028% |
| 1880 | 25 / #347 / 0.023% |