Total babies named Julian (all years): 260,614
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 7,368 / #30 / 0.430% |
| 2023 | 7,091 / #33 / 0.415% |
| 2022 | 7,301 / #35 / 0.419% |
| 2021 | 7,685 / #33 / 0.440% |
| 2020 | 7,551 / #34 / 0.438% |
| 2019 | 8,441 / #31 / 0.471% |
| 2018 | 8,367 / #36 / 0.461% |
| 2017 | 8,451 / #37 / 0.457% |
| 2016 | 8,388 / #39 / 0.442% |
| 2015 | 8,061 / #45 / 0.421% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 7,686 / #47 / 0.400% |
| 2013 | 7,519 / #47 / 0.398% |
| 2012 | 7,388 / #53 / 0.390% |
| 2011 | 7,627 / #50 / 0.402% |
| 2010 | 7,588 / #53 / 0.396% |
| 2009 | 7,387 / #62 / 0.372% |
| 2008 | 7,468 / #61 / 0.366% |
| 2007 | 6,781 / #66 / 0.327% |
| 2006 | 6,797 / #65 / 0.331% |
| 2005 | 6,116 / #74 / 0.306% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 5,673 / #74 / 0.286% |
| 2003 | 5,410 / #77 / 0.274% |
| 2002 | 5,223 / #78 / 0.269% |
| 2001 | 4,944 / #82 / 0.254% |
| 2000 | 4,590 / #87 / 0.234% |
| 1999 | 3,218 / #111 / 0.168% |
| 1998 | 3,053 / #124 / 0.160% |
| 1997 | 2,911 / #131 / 0.154% |
| 1996 | 2,858 / #129 / 0.151% |
| 1995 | 2,703 / #132 / 0.142% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,505 / #140 / 0.130% |
| 1993 | 2,490 / #135 / 0.127% |
| 1992 | 2,548 / #134 / 0.128% |
| 1991 | 2,690 / #122 / 0.133% |
| 1990 | 2,700 / #123 / 0.131% |
| 1989 | 2,210 / #138 / 0.110% |
| 1988 | 1,672 / #167 / 0.087% |
| 1987 | 1,492 / #183 / 0.080% |
| 1986 | 1,545 / #172 / 0.084% |
| 1985 | 1,529 / #174 / 0.083% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 938 / #237 / 0.052% |
| 1983 | 933 / #241 / 0.052% |
| 1982 | 993 / #235 / 0.055% |
| 1981 | 869 / #252 / 0.049% |
| 1980 | 753 / #280 / 0.042% |
| 1979 | 663 / #301 / 0.039% |
| 1978 | 644 / #293 / 0.039% |
| 1977 | 745 / #266 / 0.045% |
| 1976 | 735 / #264 / 0.047% |
| 1975 | 744 / #262 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 650 / #288 / 0.041% |
| 1973 | 716 / #264 / 0.046% |
| 1972 | 624 / #296 / 0.038% |
| 1971 | 645 / #303 / 0.036% |
| 1970 | 635 / #309 / 0.034% |
| 1969 | 525 / #344 / 0.029% |
| 1968 | 472 / #355 / 0.027% |
| 1967 | 452 / #351 / 0.026% |
| 1966 | 453 / #353 / 0.025% |
| 1965 | 461 / #353 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 507 / #349 / 0.025% |
| 1963 | 471 / #360 / 0.023% |
| 1962 | 478 / #365 / 0.023% |
| 1961 | 525 / #344 / 0.025% |
| 1960 | 491 / #353 / 0.023% |
| 1959 | 463 / #365 / 0.022% |
| 1958 | 460 / #358 / 0.022% |
| 1957 | 454 / #357 / 0.021% |
| 1956 | 450 / #348 / 0.021% |
| 1955 | 470 / #339 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 494 / #329 / 0.024% |
| 1953 | 520 / #315 / 0.026% |
| 1952 | 521 / #312 / 0.027% |
| 1951 | 492 / #315 / 0.026% |
| 1950 | 505 / #302 / 0.028% |
| 1949 | 535 / #292 / 0.030% |
| 1948 | 533 / #299 / 0.030% |
| 1947 | 552 / #295 / 0.030% |
| 1946 | 523 / #280 / 0.032% |
| 1945 | 462 / #280 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 457 / #278 / 0.034% |
| 1943 | 554 / #253 / 0.039% |
| 1942 | 530 / #249 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 501 / #248 / 0.041% |
| 1940 | 510 / #238 / 0.044% |
| 1939 | 458 / #252 / 0.041% |
| 1938 | 425 / #266 / 0.038% |
| 1937 | 449 / #253 / 0.042% |
| 1936 | 449 / #248 / 0.043% |
| 1935 | 497 / #235 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 474 / #241 / 0.046% |
| 1933 | 455 / #244 / 0.046% |
| 1932 | 559 / #217 / 0.054% |
| 1931 | 502 / #235 / 0.048% |
| 1930 | 592 / #219 / 0.054% |
| 1929 | 592 / #214 / 0.055% |
| 1928 | 633 / #212 / 0.057% |
| 1927 | 621 / #214 / 0.055% |
| 1926 | 703 / #199 / 0.063% |
| 1925 | 716 / #195 / 0.064% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 728 / #193 / 0.064% |
| 1923 | 673 / #201 / 0.061% |
| 1922 | 773 / #181 / 0.071% |
| 1921 | 765 / #182 / 0.069% |
| 1920 | 693 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1919 | 686 / #186 / 0.070% |
| 1918 | 724 / #182 / 0.071% |
| 1917 | 652 / #186 / 0.070% |
| 1916 | 625 / #187 / 0.070% |
| 1915 | 579 / #191 / 0.068% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 449 / #189 / 0.069% |
| 1913 | 360 / #187 / 0.070% |
| 1912 | 294 / #197 / 0.068% |
| 1911 | 152 / #199 / 0.067% |
| 1910 | 129 / #201 / 0.066% |
| 1909 | 102 / #210 / 0.062% |
| 1908 | 88 / #221 / 0.057% |
| 1907 | 92 / #209 / 0.063% |
| 1906 | 102 / #176 / 0.077% |
| 1905 | 78 / #216 / 0.059% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 65 / #236 / 0.051% |
| 1903 | 59 / #237 / 0.049% |
| 1902 | 62 / #229 / 0.051% |
| 1901 | 66 / #210 / 0.062% |
| 1900 | 79 / #226 / 0.053% |
| 1899 | 45 / #250 / 0.042% |
| 1898 | 69 / #209 / 0.056% |
| 1897 | 53 / #240 / 0.047% |
| 1896 | 57 / #241 / 0.048% |
| 1895 | 55 / #240 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 53 / #238 / 0.046% |
| 1893 | 68 / #206 / 0.061% |
| 1892 | 52 / #248 / 0.043% |
| 1891 | 43 / #244 / 0.042% |
| 1890 | 63 / #209 / 0.057% |
| 1889 | 49 / #231 / 0.044% |
| 1888 | 47 / #257 / 0.039% |
| 1887 | 40 / #251 / 0.039% |
| 1886 | 50 / #240 / 0.045% |
| 1885 | 49 / #236 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 48 / #249 / 0.042% |
| 1883 | 48 / #227 / 0.046% |
| 1882 | 41 / #269 / 0.036% |
| 1881 | 36 / #264 / 0.036% |
| 1880 | 32 / #296 / 0.029% |