Total babies named Jimmie (all years): 135,228
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 34 / #3411 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 47 / #2752 / 0.003% |
| 2022 | 39 / #3128 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 54 / #2472 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 66 / #2121 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 51 / #2564 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 53 / #2456 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 72 / #1986 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 69 / #2057 / 0.004% |
| 2015 | 72 / #2005 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 80 / #1850 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 94 / #1628 / 0.005% |
| 2012 | 91 / #1683 / 0.005% |
| 2011 | 90 / #1672 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 111 / #1476 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 104 / #1567 / 0.005% |
| 2008 | 112 / #1473 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 111 / #1453 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 127 / #1304 / 0.006% |
| 2005 | 100 / #1465 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 128 / #1200 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 143 / #1085 / 0.007% |
| 2002 | 111 / #1232 / 0.006% |
| 2001 | 154 / #992 / 0.008% |
| 2000 | 160 / #954 / 0.008% |
| 1999 | 176 / #860 / 0.009% |
| 1998 | 165 / #882 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 193 / #775 / 0.010% |
| 1996 | 206 / #742 / 0.011% |
| 1995 | 194 / #770 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 235 / #675 / 0.012% |
| 1993 | 228 / #682 / 0.012% |
| 1992 | 261 / #637 / 0.013% |
| 1991 | 310 / #574 / 0.015% |
| 1990 | 332 / #555 / 0.016% |
| 1989 | 311 / #551 / 0.016% |
| 1988 | 327 / #509 / 0.017% |
| 1987 | 318 / #500 / 0.017% |
| 1986 | 320 / #489 / 0.017% |
| 1985 | 341 / #470 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 330 / #466 / 0.018% |
| 1983 | 384 / #417 / 0.021% |
| 1982 | 390 / #423 / 0.021% |
| 1981 | 400 / #415 / 0.022% |
| 1980 | 484 / #363 / 0.027% |
| 1979 | 431 / #388 / 0.025% |
| 1978 | 484 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1977 | 488 / #356 / 0.030% |
| 1976 | 507 / #340 / 0.032% |
| 1975 | 577 / #312 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 581 / #315 / 0.037% |
| 1973 | 625 / #292 / 0.040% |
| 1972 | 668 / #284 / 0.041% |
| 1971 | 773 / #274 / 0.044% |
| 1970 | 817 / #266 / 0.044% |
| 1969 | 826 / #254 / 0.046% |
| 1968 | 840 / #247 / 0.048% |
| 1967 | 864 / #238 / 0.050% |
| 1966 | 924 / #233 / 0.052% |
| 1965 | 948 / #239 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,053 / #231 / 0.053% |
| 1963 | 1,121 / #225 / 0.055% |
| 1962 | 1,070 / #237 / 0.052% |
| 1961 | 1,222 / #226 / 0.058% |
| 1960 | 1,305 / #216 / 0.061% |
| 1959 | 1,286 / #215 / 0.060% |
| 1958 | 1,316 / #206 / 0.062% |
| 1957 | 1,469 / #191 / 0.068% |
| 1956 | 1,475 / #189 / 0.070% |
| 1955 | 1,386 / #192 / 0.067% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,621 / #171 / 0.080% |
| 1953 | 1,628 / #167 / 0.083% |
| 1952 | 1,642 / #163 / 0.084% |
| 1951 | 1,811 / #146 / 0.096% |
| 1950 | 1,901 / #141 / 0.106% |
| 1949 | 2,091 / #130 / 0.118% |
| 1948 | 2,362 / #120 / 0.135% |
| 1947 | 2,600 / #113 / 0.142% |
| 1946 | 2,565 / #104 / 0.158% |
| 1945 | 2,294 / #102 / 0.170% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 2,398 / #98 / 0.176% |
| 1943 | 2,628 / #95 / 0.184% |
| 1942 | 2,541 / #94 / 0.184% |
| 1941 | 2,473 / #89 / 0.201% |
| 1940 | 2,408 / #86 / 0.208% |
| 1939 | 2,524 / #80 / 0.228% |
| 1938 | 2,693 / #76 / 0.243% |
| 1937 | 2,679 / #72 / 0.251% |
| 1936 | 2,742 / #71 / 0.264% |
| 1935 | 2,829 / #69 / 0.272% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 2,837 / #68 / 0.275% |
| 1933 | 2,491 / #72 / 0.251% |
| 1932 | 2,475 / #75 / 0.237% |
| 1931 | 2,288 / #81 / 0.220% |
| 1930 | 2,255 / #86 / 0.205% |
| 1929 | 1,952 / #98 / 0.181% |
| 1928 | 1,924 / #100 / 0.174% |
| 1927 | 1,719 / #108 / 0.153% |
| 1926 | 1,609 / #115 / 0.145% |
| 1925 | 1,485 / #121 / 0.133% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,315 / #132 / 0.116% |
| 1923 | 1,162 / #141 / 0.106% |
| 1922 | 1,117 / #140 / 0.103% |
| 1921 | 1,051 / #147 / 0.095% |
| 1920 | 1,024 / #147 / 0.096% |
| 1919 | 1,020 / #143 / 0.104% |
| 1918 | 874 / #159 / 0.086% |
| 1917 | 712 / #176 / 0.077% |
| 1916 | 667 / #179 / 0.075% |
| 1915 | 611 / #183 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 530 / #170 / 0.081% |
| 1913 | 452 / #158 / 0.088% |
| 1912 | 366 / #160 / 0.085% |
| 1911 | 243 / #137 / 0.108% |
| 1910 | 259 / #125 / 0.133% |
| 1909 | 185 / #142 / 0.113% |
| 1908 | 160 / #147 / 0.104% |
| 1907 | 160 / #145 / 0.109% |
| 1906 | 139 / #149 / 0.104% |
| 1905 | 136 / #152 / 0.103% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 124 / #154 / 0.097% |
| 1903 | 128 / #146 / 0.107% |
| 1902 | 123 / #150 / 0.100% |
| 1901 | 99 / #156 / 0.093% |
| 1900 | 118 / #178 / 0.078% |
| 1899 | 61 / #215 / 0.057% |
| 1898 | 64 / #220 / 0.052% |
| 1897 | 49 / #251 / 0.043% |
| 1896 | 46 / #269 / 0.038% |
| 1895 | 65 / #216 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 44 / #265 / 0.038% |
| 1893 | 46 / #260 / 0.041% |
| 1892 | 38 / #301 / 0.031% |
| 1891 | 40 / #254 / 0.040% |
| 1890 | 34 / #297 / 0.031% |
| 1889 | 30 / #320 / 0.027% |
| 1888 | 32 / #319 / 0.026% |
| 1887 | 33 / #292 / 0.033% |
| 1886 | 37 / #281 / 0.033% |
| 1885 | 25 / #349 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 26 / #349 / 0.023% |
| 1883 | 26 / #327 / 0.025% |
| 1882 | 20 / #407 / 0.018% |
| 1881 | 20 / #380 / 0.020% |
| 1880 | 24 / #352 / 0.022% |