Total babies named Ivy (all years): 81,003
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 5,323 / #36 / 0.330% |
| 2023 | 5,057 / #38 / 0.316% |
| 2022 | 4,809 / #41 / 0.293% |
| 2021 | 4,394 / #49 / 0.268% |
| 2020 | 3,840 / #57 / 0.238% |
| 2019 | 3,688 / #68 / 0.220% |
| 2018 | 3,285 / #86 / 0.193% |
| 2017 | 2,782 / #108 / 0.161% |
| 2016 | 2,824 / #112 / 0.159% |
| 2015 | 2,505 / #130 / 0.140% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,292 / #146 / 0.128% |
| 2013 | 2,099 / #149 / 0.120% |
| 2012 | 1,698 / #186 / 0.096% |
| 2011 | 1,215 / #264 / 0.069% |
| 2010 | 1,090 / #299 / 0.061% |
| 2009 | 1,021 / #320 / 0.056% |
| 2008 | 1,122 / #299 / 0.059% |
| 2007 | 1,127 / #301 / 0.059% |
| 2006 | 985 / #335 / 0.052% |
| 2005 | 1,045 / #306 / 0.057% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 803 / #386 / 0.044% |
| 2003 | 749 / #404 / 0.041% |
| 2002 | 721 / #404 / 0.040% |
| 2001 | 836 / #355 / 0.046% |
| 2000 | 880 / #352 / 0.048% |
| 1999 | 759 / #377 / 0.043% |
| 1998 | 728 / #383 / 0.041% |
| 1997 | 688 / #384 / 0.040% |
| 1996 | 646 / #406 / 0.037% |
| 1995 | 614 / #423 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 482 / #517 / 0.027% |
| 1993 | 422 / #564 / 0.023% |
| 1992 | 286 / #741 / 0.016% |
| 1991 | 228 / #873 / 0.012% |
| 1990 | 266 / #769 / 0.014% |
| 1989 | 278 / #714 / 0.015% |
| 1988 | 305 / #645 / 0.017% |
| 1987 | 370 / #543 / 0.021% |
| 1986 | 370 / #550 / 0.022% |
| 1985 | 378 / #528 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 259 / #667 / 0.015% |
| 1983 | 292 / #606 / 0.017% |
| 1982 | 293 / #614 / 0.017% |
| 1981 | 279 / #636 / 0.017% |
| 1980 | 282 / #646 / 0.017% |
| 1979 | 323 / #567 / 0.020% |
| 1978 | 266 / #629 / 0.017% |
| 1977 | 251 / #648 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 206 / #709 / 0.014% |
| 1975 | 288 / #576 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 264 / #599 / 0.018% |
| 1973 | 237 / #637 / 0.016% |
| 1972 | 270 / #593 / 0.018% |
| 1971 | 214 / #713 / 0.013% |
| 1970 | 254 / #648 / 0.015% |
| 1969 | 241 / #638 / 0.014% |
| 1968 | 193 / #701 / 0.012% |
| 1967 | 134 / #881 / 0.008% |
| 1966 | 154 / #795 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 198 / #701 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 179 / #772 / 0.009% |
| 1963 | 176 / #781 / 0.009% |
| 1962 | 205 / #720 / 0.010% |
| 1961 | 210 / #717 / 0.010% |
| 1960 | 273 / #604 / 0.014% |
| 1959 | 318 / #546 / 0.016% |
| 1958 | 332 / #530 / 0.017% |
| 1957 | 354 / #506 / 0.017% |
| 1956 | 319 / #524 / 0.016% |
| 1955 | 268 / #553 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 194 / #666 / 0.010% |
| 1953 | 204 / #621 / 0.011% |
| 1952 | 197 / #629 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 165 / #681 / 0.009% |
| 1950 | 159 / #670 / 0.009% |
| 1949 | 129 / #760 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 124 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 119 / #800 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 61 / #1092 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 61 / #986 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 61 / #996 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 71 / #925 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 71 / #933 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 69 / #879 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 66 / #882 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 72 / #815 / 0.007% |
| 1938 | 74 / #822 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 69 / #827 / 0.006% |
| 1936 | 70 / #807 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 71 / #808 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 76 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 87 / #699 / 0.009% |
| 1932 | 80 / #756 / 0.008% |
| 1931 | 98 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 94 / #720 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 79 / #792 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 89 / #756 / 0.008% |
| 1927 | 112 / #684 / 0.009% |
| 1926 | 121 / #656 / 0.010% |
| 1925 | 124 / #662 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 125 / #665 / 0.010% |
| 1923 | 102 / #721 / 0.008% |
| 1922 | 142 / #611 / 0.012% |
| 1921 | 143 / #610 / 0.012% |
| 1920 | 142 / #602 / 0.012% |
| 1919 | 147 / #571 / 0.013% |
| 1918 | 159 / #564 / 0.014% |
| 1917 | 154 / #541 / 0.014% |
| 1916 | 188 / #464 / 0.018% |
| 1915 | 162 / #484 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 128 / #491 / 0.017% |
| 1913 | 106 / #496 / 0.017% |
| 1912 | 111 / #449 / 0.020% |
| 1911 | 87 / #436 / 0.021% |
| 1910 | 72 / #475 / 0.018% |
| 1909 | 69 / #450 / 0.020% |
| 1908 | 67 / #442 / 0.020% |
| 1907 | 70 / #428 / 0.022% |
| 1906 | 64 / #431 / 0.022% |
| 1905 | 75 / #390 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 70 / #394 / 0.025% |
| 1903 | 66 / #390 / 0.025% |
| 1902 | 76 / #367 / 0.029% |
| 1901 | 68 / #366 / 0.028% |
| 1900 | 76 / #383 / 0.025% |
| 1899 | 67 / #358 / 0.029% |
| 1898 | 85 / #338 / 0.033% |
| 1897 | 89 / #309 / 0.038% |
| 1896 | 78 / #331 / 0.033% |
| 1895 | 75 / #332 / 0.032% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 83 / #304 / 0.037% |
| 1893 | 83 / #295 / 0.039% |
| 1892 | 76 / #312 / 0.036% |
| 1891 | 62 / #320 / 0.033% |
| 1890 | 66 / #311 / 0.035% |
| 1889 | 61 / #313 / 0.034% |
| 1888 | 72 / #273 / 0.040% |
| 1887 | 56 / #285 / 0.038% |
| 1886 | 61 / #267 / 0.042% |
| 1885 | 50 / #282 / 0.038% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 47 / #282 / 0.036% |
| 1883 | 44 / #271 / 0.039% |
| 1882 | 46 / #258 / 0.043% |
| 1881 | 38 / #264 / 0.041% |
| 1880 | 33 / #273 / 0.036% |