Total babies named Irma (all years): 73,969
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 67 / #2609 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 68 / #2597 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 70 / #2538 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 60 / #2835 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 69 / #2509 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 44 / #3524 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 52 / #3130 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 71 / #2521 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 71 / #2526 / 0.004% |
| 2015 | 67 / #2662 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 67 / #2626 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 48 / #3339 / 0.003% |
| 2012 | 63 / #2784 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 72 / #2517 / 0.004% |
| 2010 | 81 / #2350 / 0.005% |
| 2009 | 97 / #2093 / 0.005% |
| 2008 | 111 / #1905 / 0.006% |
| 2007 | 106 / #1946 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 129 / #1645 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 119 / #1676 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 151 / #1383 / 0.008% |
| 2003 | 156 / #1322 / 0.009% |
| 2002 | 162 / #1239 / 0.009% |
| 2001 | 152 / #1286 / 0.008% |
| 2000 | 165 / #1206 / 0.009% |
| 1999 | 190 / #1061 / 0.011% |
| 1998 | 170 / #1125 / 0.010% |
| 1997 | 172 / #1094 / 0.010% |
| 1996 | 188 / #1000 / 0.011% |
| 1995 | 197 / #953 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 232 / #854 / 0.013% |
| 1993 | 228 / #849 / 0.013% |
| 1992 | 239 / #837 / 0.013% |
| 1991 | 285 / #729 / 0.015% |
| 1990 | 312 / #683 / 0.016% |
| 1989 | 264 / #746 / 0.014% |
| 1988 | 256 / #732 / 0.014% |
| 1987 | 223 / #790 / 0.013% |
| 1986 | 222 / #772 / 0.013% |
| 1985 | 211 / #793 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 273 / #642 / 0.016% |
| 1983 | 219 / #747 / 0.013% |
| 1982 | 319 / #575 / 0.019% |
| 1981 | 318 / #581 / 0.019% |
| 1980 | 333 / #560 / 0.020% |
| 1979 | 352 / #534 / 0.022% |
| 1978 | 319 / #551 / 0.021% |
| 1977 | 313 / #561 / 0.020% |
| 1976 | 371 / #489 / 0.025% |
| 1975 | 429 / #451 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 385 / #469 / 0.026% |
| 1973 | 470 / #416 / 0.032% |
| 1972 | 420 / #447 / 0.028% |
| 1971 | 480 / #436 / 0.029% |
| 1970 | 490 / #448 / 0.028% |
| 1969 | 574 / #394 / 0.034% |
| 1968 | 532 / #405 / 0.032% |
| 1967 | 576 / #382 / 0.035% |
| 1966 | 641 / #360 / 0.038% |
| 1965 | 728 / #334 / 0.041% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 686 / #363 / 0.036% |
| 1963 | 764 / #343 / 0.040% |
| 1962 | 773 / #339 / 0.039% |
| 1961 | 841 / #326 / 0.042% |
| 1960 | 958 / #300 / 0.047% |
| 1959 | 973 / #290 / 0.048% |
| 1958 | 955 / #291 / 0.047% |
| 1957 | 1,095 / #262 / 0.054% |
| 1956 | 910 / #296 / 0.045% |
| 1955 | 949 / #279 / 0.049% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 952 / #272 / 0.049% |
| 1953 | 931 / #268 / 0.049% |
| 1952 | 859 / #276 / 0.046% |
| 1951 | 916 / #255 / 0.051% |
| 1950 | 890 / #255 / 0.052% |
| 1949 | 824 / #268 / 0.048% |
| 1948 | 849 / #259 / 0.050% |
| 1947 | 853 / #257 / 0.048% |
| 1946 | 774 / #258 / 0.049% |
| 1945 | 682 / #258 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 704 / #259 / 0.053% |
| 1943 | 773 / #249 / 0.055% |
| 1942 | 770 / #246 / 0.057% |
| 1941 | 774 / #225 / 0.064% |
| 1940 | 749 / #223 / 0.066% |
| 1939 | 746 / #224 / 0.068% |
| 1938 | 766 / #221 / 0.069% |
| 1937 | 800 / #206 / 0.075% |
| 1936 | 748 / #219 / 0.072% |
| 1935 | 837 / #204 / 0.080% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 835 / #212 / 0.080% |
| 1933 | 817 / #211 / 0.081% |
| 1932 | 946 / #194 / 0.089% |
| 1931 | 938 / #195 / 0.088% |
| 1930 | 1,084 / #180 / 0.096% |
| 1929 | 1,074 / #184 / 0.096% |
| 1928 | 1,102 / #184 / 0.096% |
| 1927 | 1,169 / #178 / 0.098% |
| 1926 | 1,298 / #170 / 0.110% |
| 1925 | 1,230 / #177 / 0.101% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,268 / #179 / 0.102% |
| 1923 | 1,160 / #188 / 0.096% |
| 1922 | 1,167 / #184 / 0.097% |
| 1921 | 1,376 / #165 / 0.112% |
| 1920 | 1,393 / #164 / 0.116% |
| 1919 | 1,375 / #160 / 0.122% |
| 1918 | 1,333 / #166 / 0.115% |
| 1917 | 1,340 / #156 / 0.124% |
| 1916 | 1,353 / #149 / 0.130% |
| 1915 | 1,310 / #142 / 0.133% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,015 / #146 / 0.133% |
| 1913 | 830 / #144 / 0.133% |
| 1912 | 743 / #146 / 0.133% |
| 1911 | 615 / #137 / 0.147% |
| 1910 | 547 / #149 / 0.138% |
| 1909 | 499 / #143 / 0.144% |
| 1908 | 478 / #143 / 0.143% |
| 1907 | 409 / #156 / 0.128% |
| 1906 | 391 / #152 / 0.132% |
| 1905 | 428 / #141 / 0.147% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 360 / #148 / 0.131% |
| 1903 | 346 / #152 / 0.132% |
| 1902 | 368 / #146 / 0.139% |
| 1901 | 304 / #157 / 0.127% |
| 1900 | 326 / #168 / 0.109% |
| 1899 | 276 / #164 / 0.118% |
| 1898 | 319 / #160 / 0.123% |
| 1897 | 308 / #150 / 0.132% |
| 1896 | 261 / #166 / 0.110% |
| 1895 | 247 / #170 / 0.106% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 240 / #170 / 0.108% |
| 1893 | 215 / #170 / 0.101% |
| 1892 | 194 / #181 / 0.091% |
| 1891 | 193 / #172 / 0.104% |
| 1890 | 154 / #191 / 0.081% |
| 1889 | 134 / #197 / 0.075% |
| 1888 | 120 / #205 / 0.067% |
| 1887 | 90 / #219 / 0.062% |
| 1886 | 81 / #227 / 0.056% |
| 1885 | 69 / #241 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 62 / #246 / 0.048% |
| 1883 | 53 / #247 / 0.047% |
| 1882 | 58 / #227 / 0.054% |
| 1881 | 36 / #269 / 0.039% |
| 1880 | 30 / #285 / 0.033% |