Total babies named Imogene (all years): 27,886
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 73 / #2464 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 58 / #2911 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 72 / #2497 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 63 / #2731 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 64 / #2640 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 61 / #2765 / 0.004% |
| 2018 | 44 / #3528 / 0.003% |
| 2017 | 49 / #3265 / 0.003% |
| 2016 | 46 / #3432 / 0.003% |
| 2015 | 33 / #4339 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 41 / #3741 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 25 / #5380 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 28 / #5019 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 13 / #8819 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 12 / #9442 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 14 / #8614 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 8 / #13051 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 9 / #12001 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 10 / #10891 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 10 / #10410 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 8 / #12041 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 6 / #14547 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 6 / #14263 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 11 / #8983 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 5 / #15964 / 0.000% |
| 1998 | 7 / #11597 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 6 / #12668 / 0.000% |
| 1996 | 5 / #14335 / 0.000% |
| 1995 | 7 / #10946 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 5 / #14322 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1991 | 9 / #8857 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 5 / #13791 / 0.000% |
| 1989 | 5 / #13116 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 5 / #12489 / 0.000% |
| 1987 | 7 / #9141 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 7 / #8874 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 12 / #5654 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 6 / #9635 / 0.000% |
| 1981 | 6 / #9514 / 0.000% |
| 1980 | 10 / #6463 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1979 | 6 / #9401 / 0.000% |
| 1978 | 11 / #5689 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 10 / #6037 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 11 / #5345 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 12 / #4962 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 15 / #4101 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 8 / #6289 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 7 / #6810 / 0.000% |
| 1971 | 21 / #3202 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 12 / #4594 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1969 | 22 / #2869 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 18 / #3089 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 36 / #1961 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 22 / #2613 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 22 / #2626 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 51 / #1600 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 30 / #2180 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 39 / #1837 / 0.002% |
| 1961 | 51 / #1585 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 62 / #1396 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1959 | 72 / #1268 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 70 / #1270 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 91 / #1098 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 87 / #1108 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 107 / #959 / 0.005% |
| 1954 | 119 / #879 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 113 / #890 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 148 / #729 / 0.008% |
| 1951 | 143 / #731 / 0.008% |
| 1950 | 151 / #700 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1949 | 150 / #686 / 0.009% |
| 1948 | 172 / #633 / 0.010% |
| 1947 | 206 / #593 / 0.012% |
| 1946 | 219 / #533 / 0.014% |
| 1945 | 224 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1944 | 234 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1943 | 273 / #451 / 0.020% |
| 1942 | 272 / #443 / 0.020% |
| 1941 | 340 / #362 / 0.028% |
| 1940 | 360 / #336 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1939 | 408 / #308 / 0.037% |
| 1938 | 447 / #297 / 0.041% |
| 1937 | 491 / #281 / 0.046% |
| 1936 | 543 / #261 / 0.052% |
| 1935 | 614 / #253 / 0.059% |
| 1934 | 768 / #226 / 0.074% |
| 1933 | 788 / #215 / 0.078% |
| 1932 | 941 / #196 / 0.088% |
| 1931 | 907 / #201 / 0.085% |
| 1930 | 1,024 / #188 / 0.091% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1929 | 1,179 / #174 / 0.106% |
| 1928 | 1,314 / #163 / 0.114% |
| 1927 | 1,494 / #157 / 0.125% |
| 1926 | 1,253 / #172 / 0.106% |
| 1925 | 1,248 / #174 / 0.103% |
| 1924 | 1,247 / #182 / 0.100% |
| 1923 | 1,001 / #200 / 0.083% |
| 1922 | 916 / #213 / 0.076% |
| 1921 | 839 / #223 / 0.068% |
| 1920 | 804 / #229 / 0.067% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1919 | 702 / #241 / 0.062% |
| 1918 | 590 / #258 / 0.051% |
| 1917 | 564 / #262 / 0.052% |
| 1916 | 423 / #290 / 0.041% |
| 1915 | 444 / #280 / 0.045% |
| 1914 | 333 / #289 / 0.044% |
| 1913 | 227 / #317 / 0.036% |
| 1912 | 172 / #349 / 0.031% |
| 1911 | 137 / #338 / 0.033% |
| 1910 | 98 / #398 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1909 | 107 / #350 / 0.031% |
| 1908 | 88 / #386 / 0.026% |
| 1907 | 64 / #449 / 0.020% |
| 1906 | 53 / #467 / 0.018% |
| 1905 | 53 / #466 / 0.018% |
| 1904 | 48 / #476 / 0.017% |
| 1903 | 54 / #432 / 0.021% |
| 1902 | 42 / #488 / 0.016% |
| 1901 | 29 / #581 / 0.012% |
| 1900 | 59 / #434 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1899 | 32 / #531 / 0.014% |
| 1898 | 27 / #627 / 0.010% |
| 1897 | 40 / #465 / 0.017% |
| 1896 | 34 / #509 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 34 / #505 / 0.015% |
| 1894 | 25 / #587 / 0.011% |
| 1893 | 26 / #555 / 0.012% |
| 1892 | 31 / #490 / 0.015% |
| 1891 | 23 / #550 / 0.012% |
| 1890 | 22 / #565 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1889 | 26 / #490 / 0.015% |
| 1888 | 22 / #537 / 0.012% |
| 1887 | 17 / #543 / 0.012% |
| 1886 | 12 / #677 / 0.008% |
| 1885 | 7 / #872 / 0.005% |
| 1883 | 14 / #530 / 0.012% |
| 1882 | 12 / #547 / 0.011% |
| 1881 | 14 / #457 / 0.015% |
| 1880 | 12 / #505 / 0.013% |