Total babies named Hilma (all years): 2,999
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1971 | 5 / #8778 / 0.000% |
| 1963 | 7 / #5525 / 0.000% |
| 1960 | 8 / #4926 / 0.000% |
| 1959 | 7 / #5234 / 0.000% |
| 1956 | 8 / #4600 / 0.000% |
| 1955 | 12 / #3452 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 6 / #5380 / 0.000% |
| 1953 | 12 / #3349 / 0.001% |
| 1952 | 13 / #3095 / 0.001% |
| 1951 | 11 / #3361 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1950 | 17 / #2480 / 0.001% |
| 1949 | 9 / #3726 / 0.001% |
| 1948 | 12 / #3045 / 0.001% |
| 1947 | 19 / #2306 / 0.001% |
| 1946 | 7 / #4162 / 0.000% |
| 1945 | 15 / #2275 / 0.001% |
| 1944 | 12 / #2685 / 0.001% |
| 1943 | 19 / #2029 / 0.001% |
| 1942 | 18 / #2074 / 0.001% |
| 1941 | 20 / #1839 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1940 | 21 / #1765 / 0.002% |
| 1939 | 17 / #1984 / 0.002% |
| 1938 | 25 / #1522 / 0.002% |
| 1937 | 23 / #1599 / 0.002% |
| 1936 | 17 / #1907 / 0.002% |
| 1935 | 28 / #1394 / 0.003% |
| 1934 | 22 / #1625 / 0.002% |
| 1933 | 42 / #1080 / 0.004% |
| 1932 | 40 / #1136 / 0.004% |
| 1931 | 32 / #1304 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1930 | 42 / #1147 / 0.004% |
| 1929 | 47 / #1069 / 0.004% |
| 1928 | 35 / #1298 / 0.003% |
| 1927 | 65 / #928 / 0.005% |
| 1926 | 46 / #1119 / 0.004% |
| 1925 | 63 / #942 / 0.005% |
| 1924 | 75 / #864 / 0.006% |
| 1923 | 59 / #970 / 0.005% |
| 1922 | 75 / #847 / 0.006% |
| 1921 | 72 / #869 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1920 | 101 / #722 / 0.008% |
| 1919 | 78 / #799 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 102 / #716 / 0.009% |
| 1917 | 93 / #725 / 0.009% |
| 1916 | 99 / #687 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 105 / #646 / 0.011% |
| 1914 | 87 / #615 / 0.011% |
| 1913 | 45 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1912 | 47 / #731 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 46 / #639 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1910 | 41 / #668 / 0.010% |
| 1909 | 35 / #676 / 0.010% |
| 1908 | 53 / #500 / 0.016% |
| 1907 | 48 / #519 / 0.015% |
| 1906 | 42 / #545 / 0.014% |
| 1905 | 32 / #627 / 0.011% |
| 1904 | 38 / #538 / 0.014% |
| 1903 | 34 / #561 / 0.013% |
| 1902 | 35 / #550 / 0.013% |
| 1901 | 51 / #423 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1900 | 38 / #562 / 0.013% |
| 1899 | 47 / #424 / 0.020% |
| 1898 | 44 / #468 / 0.017% |
| 1897 | 47 / #427 / 0.020% |
| 1896 | 38 / #472 / 0.016% |
| 1895 | 44 / #430 / 0.019% |
| 1894 | 38 / #453 / 0.017% |
| 1893 | 41 / #425 / 0.019% |
| 1892 | 40 / #424 / 0.019% |
| 1891 | 34 / #436 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1890 | 42 / #389 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 29 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1888 | 37 / #405 / 0.021% |
| 1887 | 26 / #437 / 0.018% |
| 1886 | 27 / #422 / 0.019% |
| 1885 | 34 / #344 / 0.026% |
| 1884 | 28 / #380 / 0.022% |
| 1883 | 27 / #348 / 0.024% |
| 1882 | 16 / #464 / 0.015% |
| 1881 | 17 / #410 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1880 | 10 / #561 / 0.011% |