Total babies named Guadalupe (all years): 91,789
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 244 / #1029 / 0.015% |
| 2023 | 251 / #1008 / 0.016% |
| 2022 | 242 / #1053 / 0.015% |
| 2021 | 244 / #1036 / 0.015% |
| 2020 | 268 / #954 / 0.017% |
| 2019 | 313 / #854 / 0.019% |
| 2018 | 297 / #906 / 0.017% |
| 2017 | 391 / #729 / 0.023% |
| 2016 | 460 / #641 / 0.026% |
| 2015 | 505 / #592 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 651 / #484 / 0.036% |
| 2013 | 666 / #456 / 0.038% |
| 2012 | 788 / #393 / 0.045% |
| 2011 | 909 / #354 / 0.052% |
| 2010 | 975 / #330 / 0.055% |
| 2009 | 1,112 / #300 / 0.061% |
| 2008 | 1,124 / #298 / 0.059% |
| 2007 | 1,221 / #282 / 0.064% |
| 2006 | 1,305 / #255 / 0.069% |
| 2005 | 1,272 / #256 / 0.069% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,213 / #267 / 0.066% |
| 2003 | 1,331 / #245 / 0.073% |
| 2002 | 1,296 / #245 / 0.072% |
| 2001 | 1,342 / #235 / 0.075% |
| 2000 | 1,308 / #246 / 0.072% |
| 1999 | 1,301 / #243 / 0.073% |
| 1998 | 1,383 / #223 / 0.078% |
| 1997 | 1,406 / #210 / 0.081% |
| 1996 | 1,328 / #218 / 0.076% |
| 1995 | 1,228 / #232 / 0.070% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 1,334 / #216 / 0.075% |
| 1993 | 1,256 / #220 / 0.069% |
| 1992 | 947 / #294 / 0.051% |
| 1991 | 850 / #318 / 0.045% |
| 1990 | 838 / #328 / 0.044% |
| 1989 | 739 / #345 / 0.040% |
| 1988 | 627 / #382 / 0.035% |
| 1987 | 630 / #370 / 0.036% |
| 1986 | 607 / #381 / 0.035% |
| 1985 | 609 / #373 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 528 / #401 / 0.031% |
| 1983 | 540 / #402 / 0.032% |
| 1982 | 579 / #402 / 0.034% |
| 1981 | 622 / #374 / 0.037% |
| 1980 | 590 / #390 / 0.036% |
| 1979 | 556 / #392 / 0.035% |
| 1978 | 535 / #390 / 0.035% |
| 1977 | 549 / #385 / 0.036% |
| 1976 | 561 / #370 / 0.038% |
| 1975 | 566 / #367 / 0.039% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 489 / #410 / 0.033% |
| 1973 | 513 / #394 / 0.035% |
| 1972 | 463 / #419 / 0.030% |
| 1971 | 480 / #435 / 0.029% |
| 1970 | 485 / #452 / 0.028% |
| 1969 | 484 / #437 / 0.029% |
| 1968 | 391 / #488 / 0.024% |
| 1967 | 401 / #473 / 0.024% |
| 1966 | 423 / #460 / 0.025% |
| 1965 | 415 / #469 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 396 / #486 / 0.021% |
| 1963 | 433 / #467 / 0.022% |
| 1962 | 421 / #470 / 0.021% |
| 1961 | 406 / #479 / 0.020% |
| 1960 | 440 / #466 / 0.022% |
| 1959 | 440 / #458 / 0.022% |
| 1958 | 475 / #435 / 0.024% |
| 1957 | 533 / #397 / 0.026% |
| 1956 | 544 / #382 / 0.027% |
| 1955 | 577 / #364 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 623 / #342 / 0.032% |
| 1953 | 662 / #316 / 0.035% |
| 1952 | 632 / #323 / 0.034% |
| 1951 | 637 / #312 / 0.035% |
| 1950 | 657 / #304 / 0.038% |
| 1949 | 629 / #309 / 0.037% |
| 1948 | 667 / #295 / 0.039% |
| 1947 | 581 / #325 / 0.033% |
| 1946 | 561 / #313 / 0.036% |
| 1945 | 535 / #296 / 0.041% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 499 / #301 / 0.038% |
| 1943 | 442 / #336 / 0.032% |
| 1942 | 293 / #421 / 0.022% |
| 1941 | 298 / #397 / 0.025% |
| 1940 | 293 / #397 / 0.026% |
| 1939 | 243 / #431 / 0.022% |
| 1938 | 269 / #407 / 0.024% |
| 1937 | 274 / #392 / 0.026% |
| 1936 | 258 / #397 / 0.025% |
| 1935 | 254 / #404 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 284 / #377 / 0.027% |
| 1933 | 311 / #355 / 0.031% |
| 1932 | 316 / #358 / 0.030% |
| 1931 | 349 / #340 / 0.033% |
| 1930 | 427 / #319 / 0.038% |
| 1929 | 393 / #327 / 0.035% |
| 1928 | 433 / #316 / 0.038% |
| 1927 | 419 / #328 / 0.035% |
| 1926 | 383 / #341 / 0.032% |
| 1925 | 385 / #343 / 0.032% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 388 / #340 / 0.031% |
| 1923 | 362 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1922 | 352 / #346 / 0.029% |
| 1921 | 365 / #342 / 0.030% |
| 1920 | 323 / #366 / 0.027% |
| 1919 | 276 / #389 / 0.024% |
| 1918 | 238 / #430 / 0.021% |
| 1917 | 193 / #466 / 0.018% |
| 1916 | 150 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1915 | 155 / #494 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 156 / #435 / 0.020% |
| 1913 | 115 / #468 / 0.018% |
| 1912 | 92 / #498 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 68 / #504 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 69 / #492 / 0.017% |
| 1909 | 67 / #460 / 0.019% |
| 1908 | 56 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1907 | 50 / #510 / 0.016% |
| 1906 | 54 / #464 / 0.018% |
| 1905 | 54 / #461 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 46 / #487 / 0.017% |
| 1903 | 31 / #592 / 0.012% |
| 1902 | 35 / #549 / 0.013% |
| 1901 | 38 / #491 / 0.016% |
| 1900 | 39 / #545 / 0.013% |
| 1899 | 27 / #598 / 0.012% |
| 1898 | 29 / #600 / 0.011% |
| 1897 | 26 / #602 / 0.011% |
| 1896 | 25 / #623 / 0.011% |
| 1895 | 20 / #709 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 22 / #634 / 0.010% |
| 1893 | 18 / #698 / 0.008% |
| 1892 | 15 / #778 / 0.007% |
| 1891 | 23 / #549 / 0.012% |
| 1890 | 17 / #649 / 0.009% |
| 1889 | 14 / #700 / 0.008% |
| 1888 | 18 / #599 / 0.010% |
| 1886 | 8 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1885 | 11 / #671 / 0.008% |
| 1884 | 13 / #600 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 5 / #971 / 0.004% |
| 1882 | 7 / #770 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 6 / #778 / 0.007% |
| 1880 | 5 / #870 / 0.005% |