Total babies named Garfield (all years): 5,561
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 / #12752 / 0.000% |
| 2019 | 8 / #9161 / 0.000% |
| 2015 | 8 / #9019 / 0.000% |
| 2013 | 8 / #9066 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 5 / #12900 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 11 / #7368 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 10 / #7879 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 7 / #10130 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 5 / #12669 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 11 / #6786 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 11 / #6689 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 13 / #5656 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 11 / #6227 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 11 / #6163 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 12 / #5687 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 14 / #4853 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 13 / #4968 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 14 / #4525 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 11 / #5306 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 12 / #4897 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 26 / #2798 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 10 / #5487 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 20 / #3259 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 17 / #3515 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 26 / #2574 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 18 / #3250 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 12 / #3995 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 20 / #2663 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 9 / #4598 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 9 / #4445 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 19 / #2560 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 18 / #2610 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 14 / #3173 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 23 / #2224 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 17 / #2761 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 15 / #2938 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 24 / #2030 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 20 / #2298 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 16 / #2641 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 23 / #2027 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 28 / #1718 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 17 / #2346 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 26 / #1740 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 21 / #2003 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 28 / #1634 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 35 / #1366 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 27 / #1523 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 33 / #1321 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 25 / #1552 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 29 / #1443 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 34 / #1357 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 47 / #1132 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 26 / #1562 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 46 / #1163 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 31 / #1446 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 31 / #1421 / 0.001% |
| 1958 | 39 / #1242 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 46 / #1140 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 49 / #1086 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 43 / #1141 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 50 / #1059 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 69 / #865 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 69 / #844 / 0.004% |
| 1951 | 43 / #1101 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 70 / #815 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 67 / #838 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 62 / #869 / 0.004% |
| 1947 | 48 / #1041 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 61 / #846 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 59 / #812 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 66 / #771 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 42 / #1041 / 0.003% |
| 1942 | 62 / #825 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 70 / #740 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 79 / #681 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 67 / #735 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 63 / #773 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 54 / #832 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 48 / #886 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 54 / #853 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 60 / #800 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 54 / #844 / 0.005% |
| 1932 | 69 / #758 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 70 / #735 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 72 / #751 / 0.007% |
| 1929 | 77 / #707 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 74 / #744 / 0.007% |
| 1927 | 97 / #644 / 0.009% |
| 1926 | 86 / #685 / 0.008% |
| 1925 | 95 / #656 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 94 / #667 / 0.008% |
| 1923 | 99 / #647 / 0.009% |
| 1922 | 104 / #635 / 0.010% |
| 1921 | 102 / #636 / 0.009% |
| 1920 | 104 / #620 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 111 / #568 / 0.011% |
| 1918 | 119 / #549 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 101 / #593 / 0.011% |
| 1916 | 98 / #588 / 0.011% |
| 1915 | 101 / #564 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 81 / #549 / 0.012% |
| 1913 | 70 / #513 / 0.014% |
| 1912 | 57 / #525 / 0.013% |
| 1911 | 38 / #473 / 0.017% |
| 1910 | 43 / #409 / 0.022% |
| 1909 | 35 / #423 / 0.021% |
| 1908 | 29 / #456 / 0.019% |
| 1907 | 37 / #368 / 0.025% |
| 1906 | 31 / #389 / 0.023% |
| 1905 | 23 / #470 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 31 / #362 / 0.024% |
| 1903 | 19 / #492 / 0.016% |
| 1902 | 26 / #396 / 0.021% |
| 1901 | 24 / #384 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 32 / #394 / 0.021% |
| 1899 | 19 / #429 / 0.018% |
| 1898 | 22 / #423 / 0.018% |
| 1897 | 18 / #462 / 0.016% |
| 1896 | 20 / #447 / 0.017% |
| 1895 | 15 / #537 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 20 / #426 / 0.017% |
| 1893 | 12 / #587 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 26 / #377 / 0.021% |
| 1891 | 23 / #360 / 0.023% |
| 1890 | 28 / #331 / 0.025% |
| 1889 | 29 / #328 / 0.026% |
| 1888 | 31 / #326 / 0.026% |
| 1887 | 26 / #328 / 0.026% |
| 1886 | 38 / #276 / 0.034% |
| 1885 | 34 / #286 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 30 / #320 / 0.026% |
| 1883 | 49 / #222 / 0.047% |
| 1882 | 69 / #190 / 0.061% |
| 1881 | 147 / #88 / 0.146% |
| 1880 | 122 / #111 / 0.110% |