Total babies named Eula (all years): 47,486
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 / #9089 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 19 / #6239 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 14 / #7755 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 6 / #14021 / 0.000% |
| 2020 | 9 / #10528 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 11 / #9315 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 10 / #10044 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 14 / #7983 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 6 / #14907 / 0.000% |
| 2015 | 6 / #15090 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 6 / #15218 / 0.000% |
| 2012 | 6 / #15560 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 6 / #15438 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 6 / #15581 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 5 / #18186 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 7 / #14313 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 7 / #14044 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 6 / #14433 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 7 / #12475 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 6 / #13215 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1998 | 10 / #8798 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 7 / #10936 / 0.000% |
| 1994 | 5 / #14128 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 5 / #14193 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 11 / #7687 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 5 / #13846 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 11 / #7475 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 9 / #8251 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 10 / #7298 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 12 / #6042 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1986 | 8 / #7968 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 11 / #6164 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 14 / #5024 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 12 / #5556 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 19 / #4066 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 14 / #5049 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 30 / #2946 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 22 / #3574 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 25 / #3131 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 25 / #3105 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1976 | 26 / #2888 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 21 / #3313 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 22 / #3138 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 43 / #1921 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 28 / #2537 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 37 / #2189 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 52 / #1741 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 49 / #1738 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 42 / #1841 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 70 / #1303 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1966 | 71 / #1285 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 78 / #1219 / 0.004% |
| 1964 | 73 / #1314 / 0.004% |
| 1963 | 107 / #1038 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 110 / #1026 / 0.006% |
| 1961 | 113 / #1025 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 132 / #929 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 134 / #900 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 161 / #791 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 209 / #684 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1956 | 172 / #740 / 0.009% |
| 1955 | 213 / #637 / 0.011% |
| 1954 | 251 / #561 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 228 / #587 / 0.012% |
| 1952 | 257 / #532 / 0.014% |
| 1951 | 283 / #487 / 0.016% |
| 1950 | 286 / #480 / 0.017% |
| 1949 | 363 / #413 / 0.021% |
| 1948 | 350 / #425 / 0.021% |
| 1947 | 406 / #404 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1946 | 380 / #390 / 0.024% |
| 1945 | 376 / #358 / 0.029% |
| 1944 | 472 / #309 / 0.036% |
| 1943 | 476 / #320 / 0.034% |
| 1942 | 521 / #301 / 0.039% |
| 1941 | 496 / #291 / 0.041% |
| 1940 | 541 / #266 / 0.047% |
| 1939 | 599 / #255 / 0.055% |
| 1938 | 611 / #255 / 0.055% |
| 1937 | 659 / #243 / 0.062% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1936 | 630 / #249 / 0.061% |
| 1935 | 710 / #236 / 0.068% |
| 1934 | 769 / #225 / 0.074% |
| 1933 | 762 / #221 / 0.076% |
| 1932 | 858 / #210 / 0.080% |
| 1931 | 872 / #207 / 0.082% |
| 1930 | 1,053 / #182 / 0.094% |
| 1929 | 1,027 / #191 / 0.092% |
| 1928 | 1,089 / #189 / 0.094% |
| 1927 | 1,188 / #176 / 0.100% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1926 | 1,175 / #179 / 0.099% |
| 1925 | 1,203 / #182 / 0.099% |
| 1924 | 1,269 / #177 / 0.102% |
| 1923 | 1,307 / #171 / 0.108% |
| 1922 | 1,284 / #174 / 0.107% |
| 1921 | 1,313 / #170 / 0.106% |
| 1920 | 1,305 / #169 / 0.109% |
| 1919 | 1,390 / #159 / 0.123% |
| 1918 | 1,306 / #168 / 0.113% |
| 1917 | 1,170 / #172 / 0.108% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1916 | 1,210 / #164 / 0.116% |
| 1915 | 1,162 / #160 / 0.118% |
| 1914 | 923 / #157 / 0.121% |
| 1913 | 773 / #153 / 0.124% |
| 1912 | 742 / #147 / 0.133% |
| 1911 | 561 / #143 / 0.134% |
| 1910 | 615 / #135 / 0.155% |
| 1909 | 548 / #129 / 0.158% |
| 1908 | 558 / #122 / 0.167% |
| 1907 | 517 / #128 / 0.162% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1906 | 507 / #124 / 0.172% |
| 1905 | 502 / #126 / 0.172% |
| 1904 | 480 / #125 / 0.174% |
| 1903 | 449 / #125 / 0.171% |
| 1902 | 465 / #123 / 0.176% |
| 1901 | 408 / #124 / 0.170% |
| 1900 | 437 / #138 / 0.146% |
| 1899 | 354 / #133 / 0.152% |
| 1898 | 400 / #131 / 0.155% |
| 1897 | 359 / #134 / 0.153% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | 365 / #132 / 0.153% |
| 1895 | 342 / #134 / 0.146% |
| 1894 | 327 / #134 / 0.147% |
| 1893 | 332 / #127 / 0.156% |
| 1892 | 297 / #138 / 0.140% |
| 1891 | 246 / #144 / 0.133% |
| 1890 | 248 / #140 / 0.130% |
| 1889 | 193 / #158 / 0.108% |
| 1888 | 223 / #145 / 0.125% |
| 1887 | 188 / #138 / 0.129% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1886 | 181 / #141 / 0.125% |
| 1885 | 158 / #142 / 0.119% |
| 1884 | 111 / #168 / 0.086% |
| 1883 | 93 / #172 / 0.083% |
| 1882 | 95 / #163 / 0.088% |
| 1881 | 84 / #160 / 0.091% |
| 1880 | 70 / #179 / 0.077% |