Total babies named Enoch (all years): 12,759
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 367 / #718 / 0.021% |
| 2023 | 375 / #708 / 0.022% |
| 2022 | 306 / #813 / 0.018% |
| 2021 | 304 / #805 / 0.017% |
| 2020 | 295 / #788 / 0.017% |
| 2019 | 300 / #777 / 0.017% |
| 2018 | 318 / #746 / 0.018% |
| 2017 | 313 / #751 / 0.017% |
| 2016 | 343 / #713 / 0.018% |
| 2015 | 297 / #785 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 337 / #715 / 0.018% |
| 2013 | 257 / #833 / 0.014% |
| 2012 | 196 / #1008 / 0.010% |
| 2011 | 214 / #932 / 0.011% |
| 2010 | 196 / #1000 / 0.010% |
| 2009 | 167 / #1107 / 0.008% |
| 2008 | 158 / #1147 / 0.008% |
| 2007 | 149 / #1183 / 0.007% |
| 2006 | 124 / #1324 / 0.006% |
| 2005 | 147 / #1120 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 134 / #1167 / 0.007% |
| 2003 | 146 / #1065 / 0.007% |
| 2002 | 139 / #1079 / 0.007% |
| 2001 | 106 / #1258 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 108 / #1238 / 0.006% |
| 1999 | 90 / #1333 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 75 / #1481 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 68 / #1524 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 73 / #1427 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 56 / #1631 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 76 / #1340 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 66 / #1433 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 58 / #1528 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 59 / #1486 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 68 / #1354 / 0.003% |
| 1989 | 56 / #1483 / 0.003% |
| 1988 | 48 / #1532 / 0.003% |
| 1987 | 51 / #1429 / 0.003% |
| 1986 | 50 / #1404 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 62 / #1194 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 51 / #1303 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 49 / #1335 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 70 / #1090 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 60 / #1189 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 59 / #1189 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 57 / #1209 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 73 / #1021 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 64 / #1085 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 72 / #982 / 0.005% |
| 1975 | 54 / #1151 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 76 / #936 / 0.005% |
| 1973 | 70 / #967 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 41 / #1311 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 43 / #1278 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 54 / #1121 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 60 / #994 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 36 / #1263 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 39 / #1205 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 41 / #1169 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 38 / #1244 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 39 / #1243 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 37 / #1286 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 60 / #990 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 61 / #993 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 44 / #1183 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 53 / #1064 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 54 / #1042 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 57 / #1004 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 67 / #911 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 55 / #1015 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 60 / #956 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 52 / #1006 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 60 / #917 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 63 / #885 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 67 / #831 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 51 / #975 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 64 / #856 / 0.004% |
| 1947 | 57 / #925 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 75 / #768 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 60 / #800 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 78 / #703 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 64 / #824 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 59 / #853 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 60 / #821 / 0.005% |
| 1940 | 62 / #789 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 49 / #895 / 0.004% |
| 1938 | 53 / #853 / 0.005% |
| 1937 | 58 / #809 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 72 / #701 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 64 / #773 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 73 / #717 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 69 / #736 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 70 / #751 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 68 / #752 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 93 / #638 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 75 / #724 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 83 / #699 / 0.007% |
| 1927 | 90 / #680 / 0.008% |
| 1926 | 89 / #673 / 0.008% |
| 1925 | 81 / #719 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 106 / #620 / 0.009% |
| 1923 | 105 / #621 / 0.010% |
| 1922 | 93 / #668 / 0.009% |
| 1921 | 111 / #601 / 0.010% |
| 1920 | 110 / #601 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 112 / #565 / 0.011% |
| 1918 | 122 / #544 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 126 / #513 / 0.014% |
| 1916 | 101 / #571 / 0.011% |
| 1915 | 89 / #612 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 76 / #578 / 0.012% |
| 1913 | 67 / #524 / 0.013% |
| 1912 | 59 / #511 / 0.014% |
| 1911 | 44 / #441 / 0.019% |
| 1910 | 36 / #457 / 0.019% |
| 1909 | 24 / #535 / 0.015% |
| 1908 | 25 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1907 | 21 / #520 / 0.014% |
| 1906 | 28 / #415 / 0.021% |
| 1905 | 24 / #453 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 22 / #457 / 0.017% |
| 1903 | 26 / #384 / 0.022% |
| 1902 | 22 / #444 / 0.018% |
| 1901 | 20 / #426 / 0.019% |
| 1900 | 36 / #367 / 0.024% |
| 1899 | 41 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1898 | 30 / #354 / 0.024% |
| 1897 | 24 / #388 / 0.021% |
| 1896 | 29 / #358 / 0.024% |
| 1895 | 39 / #283 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 35 / #296 / 0.030% |
| 1893 | 30 / #319 / 0.027% |
| 1892 | 27 / #372 / 0.022% |
| 1891 | 43 / #243 / 0.042% |
| 1890 | 47 / #247 / 0.042% |
| 1889 | 33 / #296 / 0.030% |
| 1888 | 30 / #336 / 0.025% |
| 1887 | 23 / #343 / 0.023% |
| 1886 | 50 / #238 / 0.045% |
| 1885 | 43 / #253 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 30 / #319 / 0.026% |
| 1883 | 44 / #241 / 0.042% |
| 1882 | 47 / #246 / 0.041% |
| 1881 | 44 / #229 / 0.044% |
| 1880 | 60 / #202 / 0.054% |