Total babies named Elma (all years): 22,152
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 30 / #4575 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 23 / #5432 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 24 / #5361 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 32 / #4349 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 18 / #6415 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 27 / #4947 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 32 / #4384 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 32 / #4424 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 27 / #5037 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 31 / #4518 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 27 / #5065 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 23 / #5708 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 35 / #4238 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 33 / #4390 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 31 / #4644 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 37 / #4126 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 37 / #4205 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 38 / #4072 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 37 / #4020 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 47 / #3283 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 37 / #3845 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 51 / #2964 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 40 / #3413 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 48 / #2974 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 38 / #3470 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 36 / #3460 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 18 / #5645 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 13 / #6978 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 20 / #4925 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 19 / #5079 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 17 / #5523 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 17 / #5494 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 17 / #5551 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 12 / #7091 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 14 / #6230 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 21 / #4398 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 19 / #4530 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 10 / #6946 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 13 / #5531 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 22 / #3761 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 27 / #3167 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 19 / #3989 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 23 / #3560 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 20 / #3898 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 22 / #3642 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 26 / #3173 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 31 / #2699 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 23 / #3305 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 33 / #2449 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 29 / #2631 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 35 / #2264 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 33 / #2321 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 41 / #1980 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 44 / #1944 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 34 / #2280 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 47 / #1790 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 50 / #1632 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 49 / #1622 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 47 / #1635 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 66 / #1354 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 62 / #1435 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 76 / #1265 / 0.004% |
| 1962 | 74 / #1289 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 72 / #1306 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 111 / #1023 / 0.005% |
| 1959 | 89 / #1131 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 108 / #1000 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 94 / #1074 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 103 / #1007 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 104 / #978 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 114 / #898 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 129 / #812 / 0.007% |
| 1952 | 130 / #792 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 125 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 143 / #717 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 150 / #685 / 0.009% |
| 1948 | 159 / #662 / 0.009% |
| 1947 | 167 / #643 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 162 / #624 / 0.010% |
| 1945 | 179 / #547 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 162 / #577 / 0.012% |
| 1943 | 208 / #518 / 0.015% |
| 1942 | 226 / #495 / 0.017% |
| 1941 | 193 / #501 / 0.016% |
| 1940 | 204 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1939 | 204 / #469 / 0.019% |
| 1938 | 244 / #429 / 0.022% |
| 1937 | 225 / #437 / 0.021% |
| 1936 | 258 / #396 / 0.025% |
| 1935 | 267 / #393 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 285 / #375 / 0.027% |
| 1933 | 297 / #369 / 0.029% |
| 1932 | 299 / #373 / 0.028% |
| 1931 | 352 / #339 / 0.033% |
| 1930 | 362 / #346 / 0.032% |
| 1929 | 360 / #341 / 0.032% |
| 1928 | 424 / #321 / 0.037% |
| 1927 | 465 / #308 / 0.039% |
| 1926 | 449 / #313 / 0.038% |
| 1925 | 487 / #301 / 0.040% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 522 / #290 / 0.042% |
| 1923 | 494 / #289 / 0.041% |
| 1922 | 579 / #268 / 0.048% |
| 1921 | 610 / #271 / 0.049% |
| 1920 | 600 / #266 / 0.050% |
| 1919 | 594 / #262 / 0.053% |
| 1918 | 659 / #249 / 0.057% |
| 1917 | 580 / #256 / 0.054% |
| 1916 | 622 / #246 / 0.060% |
| 1915 | 575 / #245 / 0.058% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 484 / #242 / 0.064% |
| 1913 | 388 / #245 / 0.062% |
| 1912 | 375 / #234 / 0.067% |
| 1911 | 252 / #248 / 0.060% |
| 1910 | 273 / #235 / 0.069% |
| 1909 | 248 / #227 / 0.071% |
| 1908 | 208 / #234 / 0.062% |
| 1907 | 228 / #219 / 0.072% |
| 1906 | 193 / #227 / 0.065% |
| 1905 | 171 / #245 / 0.059% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 160 / #248 / 0.058% |
| 1903 | 162 / #235 / 0.062% |
| 1902 | 199 / #210 / 0.075% |
| 1901 | 189 / #209 / 0.079% |
| 1900 | 182 / #235 / 0.061% |
| 1899 | 136 / #238 / 0.058% |
| 1898 | 172 / #222 / 0.066% |
| 1897 | 156 / #218 / 0.067% |
| 1896 | 160 / #219 / 0.067% |
| 1895 | 137 / #234 / 0.059% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 127 / #237 / 0.057% |
| 1893 | 129 / #231 / 0.061% |
| 1892 | 112 / #249 / 0.053% |
| 1891 | 118 / #223 / 0.064% |
| 1890 | 108 / #234 / 0.057% |
| 1889 | 98 / #235 / 0.055% |
| 1888 | 97 / #235 / 0.054% |
| 1887 | 73 / #246 / 0.050% |
| 1886 | 82 / #223 / 0.057% |
| 1885 | 76 / #227 / 0.057% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 59 / #254 / 0.046% |
| 1883 | 42 / #274 / 0.037% |
| 1882 | 47 / #251 / 0.044% |
| 1881 | 41 / #247 / 0.045% |
| 1880 | 28 / #297 / 0.031% |