Total babies named Edd (all years): 5,450
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 5 / #12565 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 6 / #10470 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 7 / #8713 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 5 / #8500 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 5 / #7615 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 5 / #7037 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 5 / #6839 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 11 / #3774 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 5 / #6531 / 0.000% |
| 1982 | 12 / #3539 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1981 | 9 / #4259 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 9 / #4241 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 13 / #3219 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 6 / #5264 / 0.000% |
| 1977 | 6 / #5333 / 0.000% |
| 1976 | 8 / #4118 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 8 / #4057 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 11 / #3192 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 12 / #2899 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 9 / #3416 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1971 | 11 / #3018 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 14 / #2544 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 18 / #2004 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 14 / #2232 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 15 / #2057 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 23 / #1625 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 13 / #2298 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 17 / #1998 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 15 / #2138 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 23 / #1680 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1961 | 23 / #1698 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 29 / #1493 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 43 / #1184 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 42 / #1192 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 24 / #1643 / 0.001% |
| 1956 | 31 / #1396 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 29 / #1431 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 35 / #1278 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 23 / #1603 / 0.001% |
| 1952 | 28 / #1439 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1951 | 32 / #1312 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 42 / #1091 / 0.002% |
| 1949 | 49 / #999 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 55 / #934 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 58 / #919 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 73 / #778 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 69 / #737 / 0.005% |
| 1944 | 62 / #798 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 49 / #962 / 0.003% |
| 1942 | 49 / #949 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1941 | 49 / #909 / 0.004% |
| 1940 | 66 / #760 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 65 / #748 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 59 / #808 / 0.005% |
| 1937 | 59 / #804 / 0.006% |
| 1936 | 51 / #853 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 84 / #649 / 0.008% |
| 1934 | 87 / #643 / 0.008% |
| 1933 | 72 / #713 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 76 / #711 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1931 | 80 / #667 / 0.008% |
| 1930 | 105 / #586 / 0.010% |
| 1929 | 78 / #702 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 79 / #717 / 0.007% |
| 1927 | 95 / #649 / 0.008% |
| 1926 | 100 / #628 / 0.009% |
| 1925 | 116 / #579 / 0.010% |
| 1924 | 92 / #680 / 0.008% |
| 1923 | 111 / #601 / 0.010% |
| 1922 | 126 / #567 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1921 | 117 / #586 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 120 / #568 / 0.011% |
| 1919 | 163 / #465 / 0.017% |
| 1918 | 115 / #565 / 0.011% |
| 1917 | 108 / #566 / 0.012% |
| 1916 | 106 / #556 / 0.012% |
| 1915 | 101 / #563 / 0.012% |
| 1914 | 92 / #510 / 0.014% |
| 1913 | 64 / #540 / 0.012% |
| 1912 | 63 / #500 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1911 | 43 / #447 / 0.019% |
| 1910 | 33 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1909 | 39 / #389 / 0.024% |
| 1908 | 47 / #327 / 0.030% |
| 1907 | 41 / #334 / 0.028% |
| 1906 | 49 / #289 / 0.037% |
| 1905 | 43 / #307 / 0.033% |
| 1904 | 37 / #330 / 0.029% |
| 1903 | 44 / #282 / 0.037% |
| 1902 | 48 / #272 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1901 | 37 / #285 / 0.035% |
| 1900 | 61 / #263 / 0.041% |
| 1899 | 41 / #270 / 0.039% |
| 1898 | 46 / #263 / 0.037% |
| 1897 | 47 / #255 / 0.042% |
| 1896 | 39 / #297 / 0.033% |
| 1895 | 41 / #277 / 0.035% |
| 1894 | 60 / #219 / 0.052% |
| 1893 | 56 / #228 / 0.050% |
| 1892 | 65 / #218 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1891 | 53 / #220 / 0.052% |
| 1890 | 62 / #210 / 0.056% |
| 1889 | 52 / #223 / 0.047% |
| 1888 | 68 / #215 / 0.056% |
| 1887 | 60 / #199 / 0.059% |
| 1886 | 62 / #215 / 0.056% |
| 1885 | 51 / #231 / 0.047% |
| 1884 | 50 / #242 / 0.044% |
| 1883 | 43 / #249 / 0.041% |
| 1882 | 63 / #203 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1881 | 40 / #248 / 0.040% |
| 1880 | 52 / #226 / 0.047% |