Total babies named Dean (all years): 192,948
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,545 / #142 / 0.148% |
| 2023 | 2,285 / #159 / 0.134% |
| 2022 | 2,263 / #164 / 0.130% |
| 2021 | 2,350 / #166 / 0.134% |
| 2020 | 2,164 / #176 / 0.125% |
| 2019 | 2,220 / #174 / 0.124% |
| 2018 | 2,256 / #172 / 0.124% |
| 2017 | 2,081 / #188 / 0.112% |
| 2016 | 1,966 / #205 / 0.104% |
| 2015 | 1,950 / #204 / 0.102% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,711 / #222 / 0.089% |
| 2013 | 1,511 / #240 / 0.080% |
| 2012 | 1,380 / #260 / 0.073% |
| 2011 | 1,235 / #284 / 0.065% |
| 2010 | 1,183 / #286 / 0.062% |
| 2009 | 1,060 / #305 / 0.053% |
| 2008 | 951 / #344 / 0.047% |
| 2007 | 906 / #351 / 0.044% |
| 2006 | 779 / #384 / 0.038% |
| 2005 | 756 / #383 / 0.038% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 746 / #372 / 0.038% |
| 2003 | 685 / #383 / 0.035% |
| 2002 | 711 / #371 / 0.037% |
| 2001 | 744 / #356 / 0.038% |
| 2000 | 696 / #376 / 0.035% |
| 1999 | 716 / #365 / 0.037% |
| 1998 | 770 / #346 / 0.040% |
| 1997 | 804 / #325 / 0.043% |
| 1996 | 843 / #312 / 0.045% |
| 1995 | 769 / #333 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 835 / #312 / 0.043% |
| 1993 | 835 / #317 / 0.043% |
| 1992 | 836 / #315 / 0.042% |
| 1991 | 820 / #315 / 0.041% |
| 1990 | 894 / #286 / 0.044% |
| 1989 | 892 / #278 / 0.045% |
| 1988 | 863 / #271 / 0.045% |
| 1987 | 821 / #265 / 0.044% |
| 1986 | 839 / #263 / 0.046% |
| 1985 | 802 / #267 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 762 / #275 / 0.042% |
| 1983 | 747 / #277 / 0.042% |
| 1982 | 768 / #272 / 0.042% |
| 1981 | 751 / #276 / 0.042% |
| 1980 | 818 / #267 / 0.046% |
| 1979 | 846 / #251 / 0.049% |
| 1978 | 772 / #263 / 0.047% |
| 1977 | 868 / #239 / 0.053% |
| 1976 | 889 / #229 / 0.057% |
| 1975 | 1,025 / #210 / 0.066% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,220 / #184 / 0.078% |
| 1973 | 1,410 / #168 / 0.090% |
| 1972 | 1,683 / #155 / 0.104% |
| 1971 | 2,245 / #137 / 0.127% |
| 1970 | 2,941 / #112 / 0.158% |
| 1969 | 3,444 / #89 / 0.193% |
| 1968 | 3,799 / #78 / 0.219% |
| 1967 | 3,915 / #78 / 0.225% |
| 1966 | 4,040 / #84 / 0.227% |
| 1965 | 4,098 / #88 / 0.220% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 4,510 / #85 / 0.226% |
| 1963 | 4,614 / #86 / 0.227% |
| 1962 | 4,656 / #86 / 0.225% |
| 1961 | 4,931 / #84 / 0.232% |
| 1960 | 4,516 / #94 / 0.212% |
| 1959 | 4,426 / #95 / 0.207% |
| 1958 | 4,304 / #97 / 0.203% |
| 1957 | 4,387 / #93 / 0.203% |
| 1956 | 3,712 / #99 / 0.175% |
| 1955 | 3,084 / #111 / 0.150% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 3,166 / #110 / 0.155% |
| 1953 | 3,124 / #105 / 0.158% |
| 1952 | 3,156 / #103 / 0.162% |
| 1951 | 2,891 / #105 / 0.154% |
| 1950 | 2,337 / #120 / 0.131% |
| 1949 | 2,102 / #129 / 0.119% |
| 1948 | 1,909 / #143 / 0.109% |
| 1947 | 2,002 / #140 / 0.109% |
| 1946 | 1,886 / #132 / 0.116% |
| 1945 | 1,585 / #136 / 0.118% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,574 / #134 / 0.115% |
| 1943 | 1,502 / #142 / 0.105% |
| 1942 | 1,285 / #151 / 0.093% |
| 1941 | 1,288 / #143 / 0.105% |
| 1940 | 1,223 / #143 / 0.106% |
| 1939 | 1,296 / #134 / 0.117% |
| 1938 | 1,339 / #129 / 0.121% |
| 1937 | 1,314 / #127 / 0.123% |
| 1936 | 1,332 / #125 / 0.128% |
| 1935 | 1,435 / #120 / 0.138% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,476 / #118 / 0.143% |
| 1933 | 1,310 / #128 / 0.132% |
| 1932 | 1,416 / #123 / 0.136% |
| 1931 | 1,346 / #127 / 0.129% |
| 1930 | 1,365 / #129 / 0.124% |
| 1929 | 1,287 / #133 / 0.120% |
| 1928 | 1,287 / #136 / 0.116% |
| 1927 | 1,332 / #133 / 0.118% |
| 1926 | 1,245 / #139 / 0.112% |
| 1925 | 1,195 / #140 / 0.107% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,151 / #144 / 0.102% |
| 1923 | 1,011 / #153 / 0.092% |
| 1922 | 983 / #158 / 0.090% |
| 1921 | 876 / #168 / 0.080% |
| 1920 | 788 / #180 / 0.074% |
| 1919 | 722 / #181 / 0.074% |
| 1918 | 668 / #189 / 0.066% |
| 1917 | 559 / #203 / 0.060% |
| 1916 | 504 / #215 / 0.057% |
| 1915 | 453 / #225 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 337 / #231 / 0.051% |
| 1913 | 224 / #253 / 0.044% |
| 1912 | 198 / #252 / 0.046% |
| 1911 | 94 / #268 / 0.042% |
| 1910 | 53 / #347 / 0.027% |
| 1909 | 44 / #355 / 0.027% |
| 1908 | 43 / #346 / 0.028% |
| 1907 | 41 / #333 / 0.028% |
| 1906 | 38 / #335 / 0.029% |
| 1905 | 42 / #311 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 28 / #391 / 0.022% |
| 1903 | 27 / #371 / 0.023% |
| 1902 | 40 / #302 / 0.033% |
| 1901 | 32 / #314 / 0.030% |
| 1900 | 46 / #308 / 0.031% |
| 1899 | 25 / #365 / 0.024% |
| 1898 | 28 / #365 / 0.023% |
| 1897 | 40 / #285 / 0.035% |
| 1896 | 17 / #507 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 20 / #441 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 28 / #340 / 0.024% |
| 1893 | 15 / #482 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 23 / #396 / 0.019% |
| 1891 | 26 / #334 / 0.026% |
| 1890 | 25 / #352 / 0.023% |
| 1889 | 21 / #390 / 0.019% |
| 1888 | 12 / #584 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 9 / #643 / 0.009% |
| 1886 | 15 / #478 / 0.014% |
| 1885 | 10 / #614 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 13 / #529 / 0.011% |
| 1883 | 12 / #535 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 9 / #663 / 0.008% |
| 1881 | 17 / #420 / 0.017% |
| 1880 | 14 / #488 / 0.013% |