Total babies named Cordelia (all years): 12,646
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 233 / #1065 / 0.014% |
| 2023 | 219 / #1117 / 0.014% |
| 2022 | 242 / #1051 / 0.015% |
| 2021 | 253 / #1009 / 0.015% |
| 2020 | 252 / #1006 / 0.016% |
| 2019 | 231 / #1083 / 0.014% |
| 2018 | 249 / #1035 / 0.015% |
| 2017 | 210 / #1173 / 0.012% |
| 2016 | 263 / #1005 / 0.015% |
| 2015 | 286 / #949 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 267 / #993 / 0.015% |
| 2013 | 201 / #1192 / 0.011% |
| 2012 | 208 / #1181 / 0.012% |
| 2011 | 181 / #1302 / 0.010% |
| 2010 | 180 / #1306 / 0.010% |
| 2009 | 175 / #1359 / 0.010% |
| 2008 | 132 / #1688 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 111 / #1878 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 129 / #1640 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 149 / #1433 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 128 / #1548 / 0.007% |
| 2003 | 150 / #1350 / 0.008% |
| 2002 | 115 / #1609 / 0.006% |
| 2001 | 65 / #2416 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 64 / #2409 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 46 / #2903 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 58 / #2406 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 32 / #3563 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 25 / #4208 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 44 / #2742 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 29 / #3720 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 34 / #3303 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 31 / #3516 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 30 / #3555 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 38 / #2971 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 42 / #2670 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 39 / #2707 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 39 / #2584 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 28 / #3215 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 30 / #3022 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 28 / #3092 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 29 / #2919 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 34 / #2711 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 29 / #3000 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 40 / #2396 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 30 / #2874 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 31 / #2694 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 31 / #2675 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 41 / #2103 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 39 / #2174 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 27 / #2693 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 40 / #2027 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 33 / #2283 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 41 / #2037 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 39 / #2086 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 40 / #1983 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 39 / #1916 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 41 / #1824 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 67 / #1323 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 48 / #1624 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 61 / #1447 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 54 / #1523 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 76 / #1267 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 61 / #1431 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 79 / #1227 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 67 / #1307 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 79 / #1198 / 0.004% |
| 1957 | 77 / #1204 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 93 / #1060 / 0.005% |
| 1955 | 74 / #1157 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 68 / #1214 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 78 / #1099 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 67 / #1158 / 0.004% |
| 1951 | 83 / #1022 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 86 / #980 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 77 / #1019 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 90 / #915 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 65 / #1107 / 0.004% |
| 1946 | 79 / #938 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 68 / #916 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 89 / #808 / 0.007% |
| 1943 | 75 / #898 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 70 / #937 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 81 / #802 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 86 / #742 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 87 / #728 / 0.008% |
| 1938 | 69 / #852 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 109 / #652 / 0.010% |
| 1936 | 92 / #696 / 0.009% |
| 1935 | 77 / #769 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 67 / #833 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 76 / #756 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 84 / #734 / 0.008% |
| 1931 | 89 / #711 / 0.008% |
| 1930 | 89 / #743 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 95 / #723 / 0.009% |
| 1928 | 79 / #806 / 0.007% |
| 1927 | 109 / #697 / 0.009% |
| 1926 | 113 / #688 / 0.010% |
| 1925 | 99 / #744 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 131 / #654 / 0.010% |
| 1923 | 129 / #650 / 0.011% |
| 1922 | 115 / #678 / 0.010% |
| 1921 | 141 / #616 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 120 / #661 / 0.010% |
| 1919 | 146 / #573 / 0.013% |
| 1918 | 125 / #632 / 0.011% |
| 1917 | 130 / #598 / 0.012% |
| 1916 | 147 / #547 / 0.014% |
| 1915 | 135 / #551 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 89 / #603 / 0.012% |
| 1913 | 94 / #526 / 0.015% |
| 1912 | 90 / #506 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 56 / #574 / 0.013% |
| 1910 | 75 / #461 / 0.019% |
| 1909 | 69 / #447 / 0.020% |
| 1908 | 56 / #479 / 0.017% |
| 1907 | 61 / #458 / 0.019% |
| 1906 | 57 / #455 / 0.019% |
| 1905 | 72 / #397 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 54 / #438 / 0.020% |
| 1903 | 52 / #443 / 0.020% |
| 1902 | 49 / #446 / 0.019% |
| 1901 | 51 / #421 / 0.021% |
| 1900 | 79 / #375 / 0.026% |
| 1899 | 62 / #368 / 0.027% |
| 1898 | 68 / #377 / 0.026% |
| 1897 | 71 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1896 | 51 / #397 / 0.021% |
| 1895 | 54 / #380 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 52 / #390 / 0.023% |
| 1893 | 62 / #341 / 0.029% |
| 1892 | 56 / #352 / 0.026% |
| 1891 | 51 / #349 / 0.028% |
| 1890 | 48 / #364 / 0.025% |
| 1889 | 57 / #325 / 0.032% |
| 1888 | 54 / #327 / 0.030% |
| 1887 | 58 / #279 / 0.040% |
| 1886 | 64 / #260 / 0.044% |
| 1885 | 58 / #262 / 0.044% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 58 / #257 / 0.045% |
| 1883 | 51 / #252 / 0.045% |
| 1882 | 39 / #285 / 0.036% |
| 1881 | 49 / #219 / 0.053% |
| 1880 | 58 / #204 / 0.064% |