Total babies named Cecil (all years): 114,554
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 122 / #1479 / 0.007% |
| 2023 | 115 / #1528 / 0.007% |
| 2022 | 114 / #1558 / 0.007% |
| 2021 | 114 / #1538 / 0.007% |
| 2020 | 97 / #1647 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 98 / #1653 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 113 / #1511 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 103 / #1576 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 103 / #1587 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 114 / #1468 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 99 / #1590 / 0.005% |
| 2013 | 114 / #1447 / 0.006% |
| 2012 | 97 / #1602 / 0.005% |
| 2011 | 91 / #1659 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 78 / #1853 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 88 / #1743 / 0.004% |
| 2008 | 122 / #1390 / 0.006% |
| 2007 | 111 / #1449 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 107 / #1447 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 108 / #1381 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 100 / #1415 / 0.005% |
| 2003 | 101 / #1350 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 106 / #1282 / 0.005% |
| 2001 | 121 / #1145 / 0.006% |
| 2000 | 130 / #1083 / 0.007% |
| 1999 | 133 / #1042 / 0.007% |
| 1998 | 132 / #1023 / 0.007% |
| 1997 | 135 / #972 / 0.007% |
| 1996 | 153 / #885 / 0.008% |
| 1995 | 147 / #913 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 162 / #840 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 196 / #747 / 0.010% |
| 1992 | 194 / #742 / 0.010% |
| 1991 | 217 / #686 / 0.011% |
| 1990 | 231 / #664 / 0.011% |
| 1989 | 237 / #650 / 0.012% |
| 1988 | 270 / #564 / 0.014% |
| 1987 | 250 / #575 / 0.013% |
| 1986 | 276 / #535 / 0.015% |
| 1985 | 266 / #532 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 299 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1983 | 309 / #480 / 0.017% |
| 1982 | 296 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1981 | 320 / #464 / 0.018% |
| 1980 | 407 / #401 / 0.023% |
| 1979 | 351 / #426 / 0.020% |
| 1978 | 352 / #417 / 0.021% |
| 1977 | 369 / #409 / 0.022% |
| 1976 | 351 / #412 / 0.022% |
| 1975 | 348 / #417 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 419 / #375 / 0.027% |
| 1973 | 414 / #377 / 0.027% |
| 1972 | 475 / #354 / 0.029% |
| 1971 | 536 / #344 / 0.030% |
| 1970 | 566 / #337 / 0.030% |
| 1969 | 552 / #330 / 0.031% |
| 1968 | 564 / #321 / 0.032% |
| 1967 | 543 / #320 / 0.031% |
| 1966 | 678 / #284 / 0.038% |
| 1965 | 726 / #277 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 731 / #289 / 0.037% |
| 1963 | 823 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1962 | 882 / #258 / 0.043% |
| 1961 | 971 / #251 / 0.046% |
| 1960 | 959 / #256 / 0.045% |
| 1959 | 1,009 / #251 / 0.047% |
| 1958 | 1,010 / #249 / 0.048% |
| 1957 | 1,073 / #230 / 0.050% |
| 1956 | 1,141 / #215 / 0.054% |
| 1955 | 1,228 / #205 / 0.060% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,298 / #194 / 0.064% |
| 1953 | 1,254 / #196 / 0.064% |
| 1952 | 1,327 / #185 / 0.068% |
| 1951 | 1,323 / #181 / 0.070% |
| 1950 | 1,341 / #171 / 0.075% |
| 1949 | 1,318 / #173 / 0.074% |
| 1948 | 1,400 / #166 / 0.080% |
| 1947 | 1,443 / #165 / 0.079% |
| 1946 | 1,404 / #159 / 0.086% |
| 1945 | 1,355 / #152 / 0.101% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,499 / #142 / 0.110% |
| 1943 | 1,697 / #132 / 0.119% |
| 1942 | 1,620 / #131 / 0.117% |
| 1941 | 1,512 / #132 / 0.123% |
| 1940 | 1,589 / #117 / 0.137% |
| 1939 | 1,578 / #114 / 0.143% |
| 1938 | 1,558 / #118 / 0.140% |
| 1937 | 1,635 / #114 / 0.153% |
| 1936 | 1,577 / #114 / 0.152% |
| 1935 | 1,726 / #109 / 0.166% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,596 / #111 / 0.155% |
| 1933 | 1,506 / #111 / 0.152% |
| 1932 | 1,655 / #108 / 0.159% |
| 1931 | 1,769 / #102 / 0.170% |
| 1930 | 1,882 / #99 / 0.172% |
| 1929 | 1,889 / #101 / 0.176% |
| 1928 | 2,005 / #97 / 0.181% |
| 1927 | 2,227 / #92 / 0.198% |
| 1926 | 2,305 / #86 / 0.208% |
| 1925 | 2,297 / #87 / 0.206% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 2,299 / #85 / 0.203% |
| 1923 | 2,255 / #87 / 0.206% |
| 1922 | 2,336 / #85 / 0.215% |
| 1921 | 2,456 / #79 / 0.223% |
| 1920 | 2,459 / #77 / 0.231% |
| 1919 | 2,300 / #78 / 0.235% |
| 1918 | 2,328 / #82 / 0.230% |
| 1917 | 2,101 / #83 / 0.227% |
| 1916 | 2,181 / #80 / 0.245% |
| 1915 | 2,181 / #76 / 0.257% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,530 / #79 / 0.234% |
| 1913 | 1,276 / #74 / 0.249% |
| 1912 | 1,058 / #76 / 0.246% |
| 1911 | 560 / #76 / 0.248% |
| 1910 | 472 / #77 / 0.243% |
| 1909 | 432 / #72 / 0.263% |
| 1908 | 397 / #72 / 0.257% |
| 1907 | 399 / #69 / 0.272% |
| 1906 | 368 / #68 / 0.276% |
| 1905 | 347 / #72 / 0.262% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 359 / #67 / 0.280% |
| 1903 | 332 / #66 / 0.278% |
| 1902 | 354 / #65 / 0.289% |
| 1901 | 278 / #70 / 0.261% |
| 1900 | 344 / #76 / 0.229% |
| 1899 | 256 / #77 / 0.241% |
| 1898 | 243 / #87 / 0.198% |
| 1897 | 216 / #84 / 0.192% |
| 1896 | 200 / #97 / 0.167% |
| 1895 | 192 / #100 / 0.164% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 175 / #102 / 0.151% |
| 1893 | 147 / #114 / 0.131% |
| 1892 | 151 / #115 / 0.124% |
| 1891 | 108 / #126 / 0.107% |
| 1890 | 120 / #121 / 0.108% |
| 1889 | 102 / #142 / 0.092% |
| 1888 | 96 / #158 / 0.079% |
| 1887 | 80 / #155 / 0.079% |
| 1886 | 83 / #168 / 0.075% |
| 1885 | 87 / #154 / 0.081% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 73 / #186 / 0.064% |
| 1883 | 51 / #212 / 0.049% |
| 1882 | 53 / #225 / 0.047% |
| 1881 | 35 / #268 / 0.035% |
| 1880 | 45 / #248 / 0.041% |