Total babies named Bridget (all years): 92,135
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 398 / #703 / 0.025% |
| 2023 | 376 / #747 / 0.023% |
| 2022 | 356 / #793 / 0.022% |
| 2021 | 396 / #721 / 0.024% |
| 2020 | 363 / #749 / 0.022% |
| 2019 | 385 / #733 / 0.023% |
| 2018 | 398 / #717 / 0.023% |
| 2017 | 434 / #676 / 0.025% |
| 2016 | 509 / #594 / 0.029% |
| 2015 | 583 / #534 / 0.033% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 579 / #538 / 0.032% |
| 2013 | 565 / #529 / 0.032% |
| 2012 | 684 / #453 / 0.039% |
| 2011 | 630 / #470 / 0.036% |
| 2010 | 687 / #447 / 0.039% |
| 2009 | 753 / #424 / 0.041% |
| 2008 | 820 / #394 / 0.043% |
| 2007 | 909 / #357 / 0.047% |
| 2006 | 945 / #350 / 0.050% |
| 2005 | 971 / #329 / 0.053% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,035 / #309 / 0.056% |
| 2003 | 1,029 / #301 / 0.056% |
| 2002 | 1,076 / #288 / 0.060% |
| 2001 | 1,156 / #274 / 0.064% |
| 2000 | 1,167 / #274 / 0.064% |
| 1999 | 1,292 / #246 / 0.073% |
| 1998 | 1,287 / #237 / 0.073% |
| 1997 | 1,281 / #235 / 0.074% |
| 1996 | 1,530 / #192 / 0.087% |
| 1995 | 1,469 / #201 / 0.084% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 1,698 / #174 / 0.095% |
| 1993 | 1,629 / #179 / 0.090% |
| 1992 | 1,414 / #201 / 0.077% |
| 1991 | 1,447 / #207 / 0.077% |
| 1990 | 1,548 / #191 / 0.082% |
| 1989 | 1,635 / #174 / 0.089% |
| 1988 | 1,566 / #178 / 0.088% |
| 1987 | 1,540 / #180 / 0.089% |
| 1986 | 1,577 / #172 / 0.092% |
| 1985 | 1,613 / #173 / 0.094% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,685 / #163 / 0.100% |
| 1983 | 1,748 / #162 / 0.105% |
| 1982 | 2,008 / #147 / 0.119% |
| 1981 | 1,899 / #150 / 0.114% |
| 1980 | 1,832 / #152 / 0.110% |
| 1979 | 1,736 / #161 / 0.108% |
| 1978 | 1,685 / #163 / 0.110% |
| 1977 | 1,642 / #165 / 0.107% |
| 1976 | 1,707 / #154 / 0.117% |
| 1975 | 1,862 / #143 / 0.128% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 2,082 / #134 / 0.142% |
| 1973 | 2,763 / #112 / 0.189% |
| 1972 | 1,867 / #156 / 0.123% |
| 1971 | 1,711 / #181 / 0.103% |
| 1970 | 1,815 / #179 / 0.104% |
| 1969 | 1,597 / #197 / 0.095% |
| 1968 | 1,454 / #208 / 0.089% |
| 1967 | 1,556 / #203 / 0.094% |
| 1966 | 1,629 / #198 / 0.096% |
| 1965 | 1,543 / #213 / 0.087% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,480 / #225 / 0.078% |
| 1963 | 1,448 / #228 / 0.075% |
| 1962 | 1,407 / #227 / 0.072% |
| 1961 | 1,211 / #254 / 0.060% |
| 1960 | 1,151 / #265 / 0.057% |
| 1959 | 1,052 / #272 / 0.052% |
| 1958 | 798 / #331 / 0.040% |
| 1957 | 627 / #362 / 0.031% |
| 1956 | 577 / #364 / 0.029% |
| 1955 | 583 / #362 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 459 / #404 / 0.024% |
| 1953 | 526 / #371 / 0.028% |
| 1952 | 442 / #391 / 0.024% |
| 1951 | 274 / #495 / 0.015% |
| 1950 | 226 / #551 / 0.013% |
| 1949 | 220 / #561 / 0.013% |
| 1948 | 172 / #629 / 0.010% |
| 1947 | 161 / #658 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 103 / #815 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 93 / #773 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 73 / #894 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 69 / #944 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 68 / #951 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 87 / #773 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 67 / #869 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 54 / #962 / 0.005% |
| 1938 | 77 / #803 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 50 / #994 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 72 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 65 / #856 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 71 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 60 / #866 / 0.006% |
| 1932 | 63 / #879 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 78 / #758 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 58 / #958 / 0.005% |
| 1929 | 81 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 66 / #904 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 67 / #913 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 65 / #926 / 0.005% |
| 1925 | 66 / #914 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 81 / #831 / 0.006% |
| 1923 | 60 / #955 / 0.005% |
| 1922 | 81 / #808 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 78 / #840 / 0.006% |
| 1920 | 70 / #865 / 0.006% |
| 1919 | 84 / #765 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 97 / #727 / 0.008% |
| 1917 | 72 / #813 / 0.007% |
| 1916 | 95 / #707 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 95 / #676 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 59 / #749 / 0.008% |
| 1913 | 48 / #759 / 0.008% |
| 1912 | 51 / #705 / 0.009% |
| 1911 | 31 / #778 / 0.007% |
| 1910 | 36 / #706 / 0.009% |
| 1909 | 46 / #567 / 0.013% |
| 1908 | 25 / #771 / 0.007% |
| 1907 | 33 / #653 / 0.010% |
| 1906 | 34 / #612 / 0.012% |
| 1905 | 32 / #622 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 29 / #643 / 0.011% |
| 1903 | 22 / #713 / 0.008% |
| 1902 | 31 / #593 / 0.012% |
| 1901 | 34 / #521 / 0.014% |
| 1900 | 40 / #531 / 0.013% |
| 1899 | 22 / #666 / 0.009% |
| 1898 | 32 / #572 / 0.012% |
| 1897 | 47 / #426 / 0.020% |
| 1896 | 36 / #489 / 0.015% |
| 1895 | 31 / #531 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 35 / #477 / 0.016% |
| 1893 | 41 / #424 / 0.019% |
| 1892 | 34 / #465 / 0.016% |
| 1891 | 34 / #431 / 0.018% |
| 1890 | 42 / #387 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 30 / #442 / 0.017% |
| 1888 | 39 / #387 / 0.022% |
| 1887 | 34 / #367 / 0.023% |
| 1886 | 43 / #318 / 0.030% |
| 1885 | 38 / #329 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 37 / #324 / 0.029% |
| 1883 | 28 / #337 / 0.025% |
| 1882 | 31 / #317 / 0.029% |
| 1881 | 34 / #275 / 0.037% |
| 1880 | 35 / #261 / 0.038% |