Total babies named Beulah (all years): 73,445
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 26 / #5028 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 21 / #5781 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 9 / #10521 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 17 / #6734 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 11 / #9043 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 29 / #4670 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 17 / #6845 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 17 / #6855 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 16 / #7307 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 14 / #8075 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 11 / #9637 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 14 / #8205 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 12 / #9198 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 5 / #17439 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 6 / #15544 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 7 / #14075 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 7 / #14155 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 9 / #11589 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 9 / #11058 / 0.000% |
| 2004 | 12 / #8804 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2003 | 5 / #16131 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 10 / #9587 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 7 / #12258 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 7 / #11963 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 6 / #12906 / 0.000% |
| 1998 | 5 / #14438 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 9 / #9120 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 7 / #10715 / 0.000% |
| 1995 | 9 / #8860 / 0.001% |
| 1994 | 10 / #8202 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 5 / #13702 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 7 / #10612 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 12 / #7017 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 14 / #6160 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 16 / #5321 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 16 / #5085 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 11 / #6384 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 12 / #5790 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 17 / #4474 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 19 / #4012 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 17 / #4301 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 20 / #3909 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 20 / #3872 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 21 / #3733 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 19 / #3920 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 27 / #2945 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 20 / #3620 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 26 / #2871 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 23 / #3065 / 0.002% |
| 1974 | 33 / #2350 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 27 / #2634 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 26 / #2687 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 35 / #2255 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 50 / #1782 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 37 / #2060 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 28 / #2301 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 65 / #1363 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 46 / #1647 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 62 / #1394 / 0.004% |
| 1964 | 78 / #1246 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 92 / #1141 / 0.005% |
| 1962 | 88 / #1167 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 95 / #1126 / 0.005% |
| 1960 | 80 / #1221 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 117 / #978 / 0.006% |
| 1958 | 131 / #892 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 142 / #851 / 0.007% |
| 1956 | 138 / #845 / 0.007% |
| 1955 | 153 / #776 / 0.008% |
| 1954 | 195 / #657 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 182 / #665 / 0.010% |
| 1952 | 201 / #620 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 233 / #552 / 0.013% |
| 1950 | 288 / #478 / 0.017% |
| 1949 | 317 / #448 / 0.019% |
| 1948 | 327 / #439 / 0.019% |
| 1947 | 371 / #424 / 0.021% |
| 1946 | 353 / #408 / 0.022% |
| 1945 | 392 / #347 / 0.030% |
| 1944 | 462 / #315 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 503 / #310 / 0.036% |
| 1942 | 508 / #306 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 554 / #270 / 0.046% |
| 1940 | 621 / #253 / 0.054% |
| 1939 | 574 / #259 / 0.052% |
| 1938 | 689 / #237 / 0.062% |
| 1937 | 719 / #225 / 0.068% |
| 1936 | 743 / #221 / 0.071% |
| 1935 | 845 / #202 / 0.081% |
| 1934 | 931 / #191 / 0.089% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 896 / #189 / 0.089% |
| 1932 | 999 / #184 / 0.094% |
| 1931 | 1,063 / #173 / 0.100% |
| 1930 | 1,210 / #168 / 0.107% |
| 1929 | 1,279 / #161 / 0.115% |
| 1928 | 1,421 / #154 / 0.123% |
| 1927 | 1,657 / #145 / 0.139% |
| 1926 | 1,650 / #148 / 0.139% |
| 1925 | 1,777 / #143 / 0.146% |
| 1924 | 2,006 / #138 / 0.161% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 2,050 / #129 / 0.170% |
| 1922 | 2,097 / #124 / 0.175% |
| 1921 | 2,313 / #116 / 0.188% |
| 1920 | 2,376 / #109 / 0.198% |
| 1919 | 2,212 / #108 / 0.196% |
| 1918 | 2,363 / #104 / 0.204% |
| 1917 | 2,232 / #102 / 0.206% |
| 1916 | 2,401 / #97 / 0.230% |
| 1915 | 2,268 / #95 / 0.231% |
| 1914 | 1,775 / #96 / 0.233% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 1,641 / #85 / 0.263% |
| 1912 | 1,607 / #80 / 0.288% |
| 1911 | 1,244 / #79 / 0.297% |
| 1910 | 1,131 / #82 / 0.285% |
| 1909 | 1,052 / #80 / 0.303% |
| 1908 | 1,015 / #82 / 0.304% |
| 1907 | 1,092 / #73 / 0.343% |
| 1906 | 980 / #75 / 0.332% |
| 1905 | 968 / #77 / 0.332% |
| 1904 | 983 / #72 / 0.357% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 920 / #72 / 0.351% |
| 1902 | 873 / #77 / 0.331% |
| 1901 | 859 / #74 / 0.359% |
| 1900 | 974 / #78 / 0.325% |
| 1899 | 770 / #76 / 0.330% |
| 1898 | 783 / #82 / 0.303% |
| 1897 | 688 / #81 / 0.294% |
| 1896 | 750 / #77 / 0.315% |
| 1895 | 760 / #74 / 0.325% |
| 1894 | 675 / #79 / 0.303% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 622 / #80 / 0.292% |
| 1892 | 638 / #77 / 0.300% |
| 1891 | 526 / #81 / 0.284% |
| 1890 | 573 / #79 / 0.301% |
| 1889 | 498 / #81 / 0.279% |
| 1888 | 426 / #95 / 0.238% |
| 1887 | 355 / #90 / 0.243% |
| 1886 | 345 / #98 / 0.239% |
| 1885 | 309 / #96 / 0.232% |
| 1884 | 233 / #113 / 0.181% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 217 / #107 / 0.193% |
| 1882 | 190 / #112 / 0.176% |
| 1881 | 162 / #112 / 0.176% |
| 1880 | 131 / #123 / 0.144% |