Total babies named Aurelia (all years): 17,373
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 933 / #334 / 0.058% |
| 2023 | 828 / #370 / 0.052% |
| 2022 | 644 / #489 / 0.039% |
| 2021 | 595 / #518 / 0.036% |
| 2020 | 568 / #531 / 0.035% |
| 2019 | 453 / #642 / 0.027% |
| 2018 | 456 / #652 / 0.027% |
| 2017 | 435 / #674 / 0.025% |
| 2016 | 433 / #675 / 0.024% |
| 2015 | 353 / #799 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 334 / #829 / 0.019% |
| 2013 | 320 / #832 / 0.018% |
| 2012 | 253 / #1000 / 0.014% |
| 2011 | 242 / #1031 / 0.014% |
| 2010 | 215 / #1137 / 0.012% |
| 2009 | 225 / #1121 / 0.012% |
| 2008 | 169 / #1407 / 0.009% |
| 2007 | 124 / #1745 / 0.006% |
| 2006 | 125 / #1683 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 112 / #1757 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 80 / #2205 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 83 / #2106 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 74 / #2231 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 55 / #2707 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 58 / #2570 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 52 / #2680 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 60 / #2339 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 62 / #2200 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 59 / #2254 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 55 / #2369 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 63 / #2143 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 68 / #2034 / 0.004% |
| 1992 | 65 / #2078 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 65 / #2075 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 75 / #1881 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 48 / #2415 / 0.003% |
| 1988 | 66 / #1867 / 0.004% |
| 1987 | 53 / #2067 / 0.003% |
| 1986 | 47 / #2197 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 60 / #1857 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 66 / #1658 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 51 / #1994 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 70 / #1642 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 53 / #1987 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 59 / #1834 / 0.004% |
| 1979 | 75 / #1544 / 0.005% |
| 1978 | 51 / #1915 / 0.003% |
| 1977 | 62 / #1683 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 64 / #1569 / 0.004% |
| 1975 | 50 / #1840 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 53 / #1710 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 58 / #1590 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 60 / #1544 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 70 / #1467 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 48 / #1830 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 51 / #1688 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 48 / #1678 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 51 / #1581 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 52 / #1550 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 45 / #1673 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 44 / #1749 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 48 / #1648 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 56 / #1497 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 63 / #1406 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 69 / #1329 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 57 / #1417 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 59 / #1379 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 73 / #1228 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 88 / #1102 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 87 / #1081 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 91 / #1028 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 69 / #1164 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 64 / #1185 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 83 / #1021 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 95 / #913 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 93 / #919 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 87 / #930 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 88 / #942 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 84 / #912 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 91 / #784 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 73 / #893 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 85 / #844 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 80 / #859 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 94 / #728 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 79 / #796 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 65 / #868 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 108 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1937 | 99 / #683 / 0.009% |
| 1936 | 101 / #658 / 0.010% |
| 1935 | 96 / #680 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 124 / #582 / 0.012% |
| 1933 | 94 / #672 / 0.009% |
| 1932 | 115 / #616 / 0.011% |
| 1931 | 118 / #609 / 0.011% |
| 1930 | 148 / #558 / 0.013% |
| 1929 | 123 / #619 / 0.011% |
| 1928 | 157 / #559 / 0.014% |
| 1927 | 169 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1926 | 177 / #525 / 0.015% |
| 1925 | 187 / #516 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 187 / #524 / 0.015% |
| 1923 | 179 / #529 / 0.015% |
| 1922 | 144 / #601 / 0.012% |
| 1921 | 166 / #551 / 0.013% |
| 1920 | 174 / #539 / 0.015% |
| 1919 | 158 / #548 / 0.014% |
| 1918 | 188 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1917 | 173 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1916 | 162 / #513 / 0.016% |
| 1915 | 164 / #481 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 111 / #526 / 0.015% |
| 1913 | 102 / #503 / 0.016% |
| 1912 | 90 / #504 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 81 / #456 / 0.019% |
| 1910 | 69 / #490 / 0.017% |
| 1909 | 71 / #440 / 0.020% |
| 1908 | 83 / #399 / 0.025% |
| 1907 | 72 / #420 / 0.023% |
| 1906 | 49 / #492 / 0.017% |
| 1905 | 47 / #490 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 40 / #521 / 0.015% |
| 1903 | 46 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1902 | 50 / #440 / 0.019% |
| 1901 | 53 / #411 / 0.022% |
| 1900 | 66 / #415 / 0.022% |
| 1899 | 54 / #390 / 0.023% |
| 1898 | 56 / #413 / 0.022% |
| 1897 | 44 / #441 / 0.019% |
| 1896 | 42 / #448 / 0.018% |
| 1895 | 45 / #421 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 46 / #409 / 0.021% |
| 1893 | 45 / #401 / 0.021% |
| 1892 | 36 / #453 / 0.017% |
| 1891 | 33 / #441 / 0.018% |
| 1890 | 33 / #446 / 0.017% |
| 1889 | 35 / #411 / 0.020% |
| 1888 | 36 / #414 / 0.020% |
| 1887 | 25 / #447 / 0.017% |
| 1886 | 29 / #401 / 0.020% |
| 1885 | 17 / #524 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 21 / #438 / 0.016% |
| 1883 | 14 / #523 / 0.012% |
| 1882 | 18 / #434 / 0.017% |
| 1881 | 15 / #436 / 0.016% |
| 1880 | 21 / #353 / 0.023% |